Delhi Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anil Kumar Gujral and anr Vs. Rajesh Singh and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h December, 2012 + MAC.APP. 805/2012 ANIL KUMAR GUJRAL & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr.Anil Kumar Gujral, A-1 in person. versus RAJESH SINGH & ORS. Through: .... Respondents Mr.Pradeep Gaur, Advocate for R-3 Insurance Company CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. The present Appeal is allowed in terms of the judgment passed today in MAC APP. 789/2012 titled ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. v. ANIL KUMAR GUJRAL & ORS.2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE DECEMBER 12 2012 v...
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Suresh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2012
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h December, 2012 + MAC. APP. 676/2011 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate Versus SURESH & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Navneet Goyal with Ms. Suman N. Rawat, Advocates for the Respondents No.1 & 2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The present Appeal is dismissed in terms of the judgment passed today in MAC.APP.672/2011 titled RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. JYOTI & ORS.2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE DECEMBER 12 2012 pst...
M/S Supreme Infrastructure India Limited Vs. Rail Vikas Nigam Limited ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:01. 11.2012 % Judgment delivered on:12. 12.2012 + W.P.(C.) No. 3817/2012 M/S SUPREME INFRASTRUCTURE INDIA LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Kanika Sinha, Mr. Tanmaya Sinha & Mr. Ankit Bhatnagar, Advocates versus RAIL VIKAS NIGAM LIMITED AND ANOTHER Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Anil Seth & Mr. M.K.Pathak, Advocates for Respondent No. 1 Mr. Sameer Parekh, Mr. D.P.Mohanty & Ms. Shweta Sharma, Advocates for Respondent No.3. None for Respondent No.2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to seek a writ of mandamus directing respondent No. 1 Rail Vikas Nigam Limited (RVNL) to award the contract to the petitioner arising out of the tender floated by respondent No. 1 bearing No. IFB No. RVNL/BANGALORE/HOSPET-TINAI GHAT/2011/02 dated 03.06.2011 for execution of...
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Raj Paul @ Rajju and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2012
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h December, 2012 + MAC. APP. 3/2012 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate. Versus RAJ PAUL @ RAJJU & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The present Appeal is disposed of in terms of the judgment passed today in MAC.APP.1081/2011 titled RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. ANKIT MAHESHWARI & ORS.2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE DECEMBER 12 2012 pst...
Raman Juneja Vs. Sudershan Juneja
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2012
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) 1346/2012 Date of Decision:12. 12.2012 RAMAN JUNEJA Through: Petitioner Mr.S.C.Singhal, Advocate. Versus Respondent SUDERSHAN JUNEJA Through: Nemo. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeks assailing the order 30.07.2012 of learned ADJ, whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner against the order dated 5.11.2011 of Civil Judge, was dismissed. The present petition seems to have been wrongly filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, and the same is being treated as one under Article 227 of the Constitution.2. The respondent, who is the mother of the petitioner had filed a suit against him for possession and recovery of mesne profits. Her case was that the petitioner was in permissive possession of the suit premises, being her son. Since he had acted against her as also her husbands wishes and interests, he was debarred from their life and properties by way of a p...
Babita Rani and ors. Vs. Harinder Pal Singh Chawla and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h December, 2012 + MAC. APP. 748-752/2005 BABITA RANI & ORS. Through: ..... Appellants Mr.R.D.Shahlia, Advocate versus HARINDER PAL SINGH CHAWLA & ORS. Through: + .... Respondents Mr.S.L.Gupta, Advocate MAC. APP. 1253/2012 HARINDER PAL SINGH CHAWLA & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr.S.L.Gupta, Advocate versus BABITA RANI & ORS. & ORS. Through: + .... Respondents Mr.R.D.Shahlia, Advocate MAC. APP. 1254/2012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD. ..... Appellants Through: Mr.S.L.Gupta, Advocate versus BABITA RANI & ORS. & ORS. Through: .... Respondents Mr.R.D.Shahlia, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. These three Appeals (MAC. APP. 748-52/2005, MAC. APP. 1253/2012 & MAC. APP. 1254/2012) arise out of a judgment dated 25th May, 2005 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby while computing the compensation of ` 3,80,000/- for the death of Suraj Prakash Gupta...
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Hitesh Negi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2012
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h December, 2012 + MAC. APP. 1084/2011 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate. Versus HITESH NEGI & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The present Appeal is disposed of in terms of the judgment passed today in MAC.APP.1081/2011 titled RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. ANKIT MAHESHWARI & ORS.2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE DECEMBER 12 2012 pst...
Convergys Customer Management Vs. Assistant Director of Income Tax and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:8. h October, 2012. Date of Decision:12. h December, 2012. % + WP(C) No.6468/2010 CONVERGYS CUSTOMER MANAGEMENT .... Appellant Through Ms. S. Ganesh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Anand Sukumar and Mr. Bhupesh Kumar Pathak, Advs. VERSUS ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX & ANR. ..Respondents Through Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, sr. standing counsel with Mr. Puneet Gupta and Ms. Gayatri Verma, Advs. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR R.V. EASWAR, J.: This petition under Article 226/227 has been filed in the following circumstances. The petitioner is a company incorporated in USA. It is engaged in the business of providing business process outsourcing services to its clients located worldwide. It has a subsidiary in India which is known as Convergys India Services Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as CISPL). CISPL renders back office services exclusively to the petitioner-company.2. In respect of the assessment years 2002-03 and...
Rajkumar Devraj and anr Vs. Jai Mahal Hotels Pvt Ltd and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2012
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:05.12.2012. Judgment delivered on12.12.2012. CO.A(SB) 25/2011 RAJKUMAR DEVRAJ & ANR ..... Appellant Through Mr. Vibhu Bhakru Sr. Adv. with Mr.Abhishek K. Rao, Ms. Anjali Varma and Ms. Meera Mathur, Adv. versus JAI MAHAL HOTELS PVT LTD & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. U.K. Chaudhary, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Sanjay Sen and Ms. Srishti Jain Singh, Adv. Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Adv and Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr.D. D. Singh, Ms. Nand Devi Deka and Mr. Sanket, Adv. for R-2. Mr.Shyam Munjrani, Advocate for R-4. + CO.A(SB) 27/2011 SMT. URVASHI DEVI & ORS ..... Appellant Through Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Adv and Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr.D. D. Singh, Ms. Nand Devi Deka and Mr. Sanket, Adv. for appellant No.2. versus M/S JAI MAHAL HOTELS PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Vibhu Bhakru Sr. Adv. with Mr.Abhishek K. Rao, Ms. Anjali Varma and Ms. Meera Mathur, Adv. + CO.A(SB) 49/2011 RAJKUMAR DEVRAJ & ANR ........
Bharat Lal Vs. Mcd and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-12-2012
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + EX.F.A. NO.27/2012 BHARAT LAL ..... Appellant versus MCD & ORS. ..... Respondents Date of Decision:12. h December, 2012 Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr. Sanjay Bansal, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Himanshu Upadhyay, Advocate with Mr. K. Kanan, Executive Engineer, MCD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(Oral) Ex.FA No.27/2012 1. This appeal has been moved by the decree holder, Sh. Bharat Lal, under Order XXI Rule 58 of the CPC impugning the order passed by the court below on 7th April, 2012 while disposing off his Execution Petition by holding that the Judgment Debtor; who is arrayed as the respondent before this Court; had already paid the decretal amount to the Decree Holder/appellant as per the Award dated 26th November, 2009, which had been further modified in favour of the Decree Holder by this Court in OMP No.153/2010.2. The appellant had been awarded a contract...
- ‹ Prev
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›
- Last »