Delhi Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Wireless Broadband Bisness Services (Delhi) Pvt. L Vs. ............... ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-14-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:14. h December, 2012 % + CO.APPL.(M) 135/2012 WIRELESS BRAODBAND BUSINESS SERVICES (DELHI ) PVT LTD ..... Transferor Company No. 1 Applicant AND WIRELESS BRAODBAND BUSINESS SERVICES (KERALA ) PVT LTD ..... Transferor Company No. 2 AND WIRELESS BRAODBAND BUSINESS SERVICES (HARYANA ) PVT LTD ..... Transferor Company No. 3 WITH WIRELESS BRAODBAND BUSINESS SERVICES LTD Through ..... Transferee Company Mr. N. Ganpathy, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1. This is a first motion application under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 filed by Wireless Broadband Business Services (Delhi) Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferor Company No. 1 or Applicant Company) in respect of a Scheme of Amalgamation between the Applicant Company; Wireless Broadband Business Services (Kerala) Private Limited (Transferor Company No. 2); and Wireless Broadband Business Services (Haryana) Priv...
Pintu Singh Yadav Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-13-2012
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: December 13, 2012 + WP(C) 7748/2012 PINTU SINGH YADAV ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.U.Srivastava, Advocate. versus UOI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Amrit Pal Singh, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner was born in the year 1991 in a village named Jayantidas Pur in District Ghazipur, U.P. He was born in a landless family having a caste which is notified as an OBC.2. With respect to an FIR lodged on September 30, 2007 by one Baily Devi, along with his brothers and father, the petitioner was named as an accused for having committed offences punishable under Section 323/325/504/506(2)/34 IPC. After investigation was over a challan was presented before the learned Judicial Magistrate resulting in Crl.Case No.5648/2008 being taken cognizance of by the learned Judicial Magistrate.3. Applying for the post of a ...
M/S Osho Ceramics Ltd. Vs. -------------------
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-13-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:13.12.2012 + Co.Pet. No.11/2004 IN THE MATTER OF M/S OSHO CERAMICS LTD. Through: Mr.Manish Bishnoi, Advocate for the Official Liquidator. Mr.Vishal Kumar Pandey, Advocate for IDBI. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) C.A. No.2420/2012 1. This is an application filed by the Official Liquidator seeking dissolution of the company M/s Osho Ceramics Ltd. (in liquidation) under Section 481 of the Companies Act. The company was wound up on 06.10.2004.2. Statement of ex-director Mr.P.R.Goel and Rakesh Chawla under Rule 130 of the Companies (Courts) Rules was recorded on 06.10.2004; statement of affairs of the company was also filed on 09.12.2004. The factory premises of the company situated at 12 K.M.Stone, Balsmand Road, Village Rawalwas, Distt. Hissar, Haryana was sold for Rs.2.51 crores. No criminal complaint under Section 454 (5) of the Companies Act is pending against the ex-director of the company...
Ashwani Kohli Vs. the State of Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-13-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Crl. M.C. No. 2307/2012 + Date of Decision:13. h December, 2012 # ! ASHWANI KOHLI ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Bharat Sharma, Advocate Versus $ * THE STATE OF DELHI & ANR. Respondents Through: Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP for the State Mr. R.S. Juneja, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER P.K.BHASIN, J: By way of this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 the petitioner has sought quashing of FIR No. 574/1999 under Sections 420/404/467/468/471/120-B IPC registered against him at police station Connaught Place at the instance of his own brother, respondent no.2 herein as also the ongoing trial in respect of the said FIR.2. The registration of the criminal case against the petitioner at the instance of his brother was because of the petitioner selling certain shares, which though were registered in the name of their father but according to the respondent no.2-compla...
Mrs. Lata Seth and ors. Vs. Narinder Nath Seth and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-13-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : November 22, 2012 Judgment Pronounced on : December 13, 2012 + RFA(OS) 41/2012 MRS. LATA SETH & ORS. .....Appellants Represented by: Mr.Jatinder Kumar Sethi, Advocate. versus NARINDER NATH SETH & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Gaurav Puri, Ms.Geeta Anand and Mr.Harsh Gupta, Advocates for R-1 to R-4. Mr.K.B.Thakur, Proxy Counsel for R-5(a) to (d). None for R-6(a) to (f) (service dispensed with vide order dated April 20, 2012) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The ancestry of the litigating parties may be noted. The pedigree table is as under:Lakshmi Narain Seth I ------------------------------------------------------------------------I I I I Kedar Nath Seth Manmohan Seth Krishan Lal Seth Kamla Chopra Son Son Son Daughter Defendant No.6 Defendant No.7 Kedar Nath Seth I --------------------------------------------------------------------------...
Shayam Lal Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-13-2012
19 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 326/2010 & Crl.M.(Bail) 845/2010 SHAYAM LAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. O.P. Saxena, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP for State with SI Kamlesh, PS Moti Nagar Date of Decision :13. h December, 2012 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J : (Oral) 1. Present criminal revision petition has been filed challenging the order dated 02nd June, 2010 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) confirming the order of conviction and sentence passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate (MM) convicting the petitioner under Section 16(1)(c) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act read with Sections 353/186 IPC.2. It is pertinent to mention that the MM had sentenced the petitioner to six months rigorous imprisonment.3. The relevant facts of the present case are that in the complaint filed by the Food Inspectors, it was stated that when they visited the petitioners shop for the purpose...
Steel Authority of India Ltd. Vs. Punjab and Sind Bank and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-13-2012
% *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. h December, 2012 + LPA No.1115/2004 STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. H.S. Phoolka, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Gursimranjit Singh & Mohd. Aaquil, Advs. Versus PUNJAB & SIND BANK & ORS. Through: None. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ..... Respondents RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.This intra-court appeal impugns the judgment dated 20.09.2004 of a learned Single Judge of this Court of dismissal of W.P.(C) No.5678/1998 preferred by the appellant for the reason of entailing disputed questions of fact incapable of adjudication in writ jurisdiction and relegating the appellant to the remedy of a suit and further holding the appellant entitled to avail of the time spent in prosecuting the writ petition, if the suit were to be filed within 30 days of the dismissal of the writ petition.2. Notice of the appeal was issued. Vide order dated 24.04.2006, the respondents No.3 &4 were proceed...
Manmeet Kaur Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-13-2012
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. h December, 2012 % + W.P.(C) No.6609/2012 MANMEET KAUR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Agarwal & Mr. Pradeep Chhindra, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, CGSC with Mr. Gaurav Sharma & Mr. Aditya Malhotra, Advs. for UOI. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.This writ petition, filed in public interest, by an Advocate practicing in this Court, draws the attention of this Court to the state of affairs prevailing in the Securities Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, established under The Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (SEBI). It is stated, that the said Tribunal was constituted to hear appeals against the orders of the Adjudicating Officers and comprises of a Presiding Officer and two technical members; that only a sitting or a retired Judge of the Supreme Court or a sitting or a retir...
Dr.Yashwant Singh Vs. Ashutosh Verma and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-13-2012
$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 29/2012 % Judgment delivered on:13. h January, 2012 DR.YASHWANT SINGH ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr Advocate with Mr.Mohit Chaudhary, Mr.Dheeraj Gupta and Ms.Anita Das, Advs. versus ASHUTOSH VERMA & ANR. ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Rajdipa Behrua, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) CRL. M.A.519/2012 Exemption is allowed subject to just exceptions. Criminal M.A. stands disposed of. CRL.Rev.P.29/2012 1. Vide instant petition, the petitioner has challenged the notice issued to petitioner under signature of Reader to SDM.2. Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted at bar that except this notice there is no order on record passed by the ld. SDM, which is mandatory under Section 145 of CrPC. For the convenience the Section 145(1) is reproduced as under:Whenever an Executive Magistrate is satisfied from a report of a police officer ...
Rajender Singh and ors. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-13-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: December 04, 2012 Pronounced on: December 13, 2012 + W.P.(C) 7124/2009 RAJENDER SINGH & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta, Senior Advocate, with Mr.V.P.Rana & Mr. Ravinder Marwal, Advocates. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. V.K. Tandon, Advocate for respondents No. 1 & 3. Mr. Hemant Malhtora, Advocate for respondents No. 4 to 7. Mr. Virender Singh, Advocate for respondents No. 8 to 12 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % 1. JUDGMENT The grievance of petitioners in this writ petition is that application under Section 43A of East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation & Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948 (henceforth referred to as Consolidation Act) preferred by respondents No. 4 to 7, i.e., the contesting respondents herein, has been allowed by Consolidation Officer vide order of 24 th December, 2004 without putting petitioners to notice, although they are in possession of Khasra No.703 ...
- ‹ Prev
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- Next ›
- Last »