Delhi Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds — plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed — log in to pick up where you left off.
Harpal Singh and anr. Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Reserved on: December 20, 2012 Pronounced on: December 21, 2012 RFA 516/2000 & CM No.14218/2012 HARPAL SINGH & ANR. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. B.S.Mathur, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak and Mr. K.Kiran Pathak, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT 1 Impugned judgment of 14th August, 2000 determines the compensation payable @ `1,39,500/- per bigha in respect of land situated in the Revenue Estate of Village Bijwasan, New Delhi acquired vide Notification of 31st December, 1993 under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.2. In the amended appeal, enhanced compensation @ ` 6 lakhs per bigha is sought by ascertaining that rapid development in the entire area of this village is taking place and apart from the acquired land being fertile and ideally situated, it is in the vicinity of developed residential colonies like Dwarkapuri, Palam Vihar, DLF Colony and very ...
itsuko Fujimoto Nandi Vs. Uoi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:21. 12.2012 + FAO 271/2009 ITSUKO FUJIMOTO NANDI ..... Appellant Through : Ms. Anu Mehta, Advocate. versus UOI & ANR Through : ..... Respondents Ms. Poonam Lau with Mr Ajay Sharma, Advocates for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL VEENA BIRBAL, J.1. Present is an appeal under Section 299 of the Indian Succession Act wherein challenge has been made to impugned judgment dated 29.05.2009 passed by the learned Addl. District Judge, Delhi whereby the petition filed by the appellant for grant of succession certificate in respect of estate left by deceased Dr. Parkash Kumar Nandi has been dismissed.2. The appellant had filed a petition under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act wherein she had stated that she was the widow of deceased Dr. Parkash Kumar Nandi who died on 19.06.1998 at New Delhi. The deceased was working as Joint Director with respondent no.1. According to her, she got married with Dr. Parkash Kumar Nandi i...
Sunny Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :5. h November, 2012 DECIDED ON :21. t December, 2012 CRL.A.601/2011 SUNNY Through : Versus THE STATE Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Swastik Singh, Advocate. ..... Respondent Mr.Sanjay Lao, APP. CRL.A.713/2011 VIKKI Through : Versus STATE & ORS. Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Swastik Singh, Advocate. ..... Respondents Mr.Sanjay Lao, APP. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The present appeals are partly allowed in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file of Crl.A.No.732/2011 titled Vicky Kumar vs. State. (S.P.GARG) JUDGE (SANJIV KHANNA) JUDGE DECEMBER 21 2012/tr...
M/S Sanjay Kumar and Co. Exim Limited and anr. Vs. ...................
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:21.12.2012 (ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) CO. APPL. (M) No. 195 OF 201.IN THE MATTER OF COMPANIES ACT, 1956 (1 OF 1956.SECTIONS 39 & 394. AND IN THE MATTER OF SCHEME OF AMALGAMATION/ MERGER AND IN THE MATTER OF: M/s SANJAY KUMAR & CO. EXIM LIMITED -------Applicant/ Transferor Company WITH M/s RAJKRIPAL TIMBER INDUSTRIES PVT. LIMITED ----- Transferee Company Through: CO(A) M No. 195/2012 Mr. Abhay K. Das, Advocate with Shabnam INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1. This is first motion Application under Section 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, (for short, the Act) in connection with the Scheme of Amalgamation/ Merger (for short Scheme) of M/s Sanjay Kumar & Co. Exim Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Transferor Company) with M/s Rajkripal Timber Industries Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Transferee Company) and the Scheme of Amalgamation provides for the amalgamation/merger of M/s Sanjay Kumar & Co. Exim Ltd. with the Transfe...
M/S Rajkripal Timber Industries Pvt. Limited and anr Vs. ............. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:21.12.2012 (ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) CO. APPL. (M) No. 196 OF 201.IN THE MATTER OF COMPANIES ACT, 1956 (1 OF 1956.SECTIONS 39 & 394. AND IN THE MATTER OF SCHEME OF AMALGAMATION/ MERGER AND IN THE MATTER OF: M/s RAJKRIPAL TIMBER INDUSTRIES PVT. LIMITED -------Applicant/ Transferee Company AND M/s SANJAY KUMAR & CO. EXIM LIMITED ----- Transferor Company Through: Mr. Abhay K. Das, Advocate with Shabnam Shalini Advocate. INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1. This is first motion Application under Section 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, (for short, the Act) in connection with the Scheme of Amalgamation/ Merger (for short Scheme) between M/s Rajkripal Timber Industries Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Transferee Company) and M/s Sanjay Kumar & Co. Exim Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Transferor Company) and the Scheme of Amalgamation/Merger provides for the merger of M/s Sanjay Kumar & Co. Exim Ltd. with the Transferee Co...
Bheem Singh Meena Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:21. t December, 2012 + W.P.(C) No.7325/2010 BHEEM SINGH MEENA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.R.K. Saini, Adv. with Mr. Vikas Saini, Adv. Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. Through: .... Respondents Mr.Ruchi Sindhwani, Adv. with Ms. Bandana Shukla, Adv. & Ms. Megha, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA GITA MITTAL, J 1.By way of this petition, the writ petitioner prays for quashing of the orders dated 19th November, 2009 and 10th March, 2010 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi dismissing OA No.3196/2009 and RA No.7/2010 filed by the petitioner.2. The petitioner hails from village Matasula, Tehsil Todabhim, District Kanauli in the State of Rajasthan and belongs to the reserved category. He undertook the test conducted by the Delhi Subordinate Service Selection Board (hereinafter referred to as `DSSSB). Vide a memorandum dated 17th November, 1999 the petiti...
Manisha Sharma Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Reserve:29. h November, 2012 Date of Pronouncement:21st December, 2012 % + LPA No.489/2004 MANISHA SHARMA Through: ..... Appellant Appellant in person. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: ..... Respondents None. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW : D.MURUGESAN, CHIEF JUSTICE 1 This intra court appeal arises out of the order dated 08.01.2004 dismissing the writ petition filed by the appellant herein. The appellant was constrained to approach this Court by filing the writ petition seeking for a direction to the respondents therein to call for records and proceedings of the Fact Finding Inquiry Committee and the Standing Complaints Committee, quash the same and consequentially to direct the appropriate disciplinary authority to take appropriate disciplinary action against respondent No.5, Mr.Raj Kumar, the then Executive Director (Industrial Relations), Railway Board, New Delhi for his act of mor...
Vicky Kumar Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :5. h November, 2012 DECIDED ON :21. t December, 2012 + CRL.A.732/2011 VICKY KUMAR Through : ..... Appellant Mr.R.P.Luthra, Advocate with Mr.Saurabh Luthra, Advocate. versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Sanjay Lao, APP. Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Swastik Singh, Advocate. CRL.A.601/2011 SUNNY Versus THE STATE Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Sanjay Lao, APP. Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Swastik Singh, Advocate. CRL.A.713/2011 VIKKI Versus STATE & ORS. Through : Crl.A.Nos. 732/11, 601/11 & 713/11 ..... Respondents CORAM: MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Vikki Kumar S/o Ashok Kumar (A-1), Sunny (A-2) and Vikki S/o Prem Pal (A-3) have directed the appeals against the judgment dated 08.03.2011 and order on sentence dated 07.04.2011 in Sessions Case No.110/06/10 of learned Additional Sessions Judge by which they were held responsible for committing Pradeeps murder and sentenced to undergo imprisonment fo...
M/S Gopal Dass and Sons Vs. Dineshwar Nath Kedar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + R.C. Rev 240/2011 Date of Decision:21. 12.2012 M/s GOPAL DASS & SONS Through: ....Petitioner Mr.P.C.Dhingra, Adv. with Mr.P.Choudhury, Adv. Versus DINESHWAR NATH KEDAR Through: ...Respondent Ms.Kamlakshi Singh, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J.1. This revision petition under Section 25B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (for short the Act) is directed against the order of Addl. Rent Controller (ARC) dated 28.02.2011, whereby the leave to defend application filed by the petitioner, was dismissed and an eviction order was passed against it.2. The petitioner is the tenant in respect of one godown on the ground floor in property bearing no.1160, Chhatta Madan Gopal, Maliwara, Chandini Chowk, Delhi-110006 (hereinafter referred to as the tenanted premises), which was let out for commercial purpose. The respondent filed an eviction petition under Section 14 (1) (e) of the Act on the ground that the tenanted premises was required ...
Metro Institutes of Medical Sciences P Ltd Vs. Dr Fahad Islahi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:21. 12.2012 CS(OS) 3289/2012 METRO INSTITUTES OF MEDICAL SCIENCES P LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr Hemant Singh, Ms Mamta Jha, Mr Sachin Gupta, Mr Shashi Ojha and Mr Siddhant Asthana, Advs. versus DR FAHAD ISLAHI & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Ms Prathiba M. Singh with Mr Varun Kumar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) IAs No.20886/2012 (O.39. R. 1&2 CPC) and 22389/2012 (O 3.R. 4 CPC) 1. The plaintiff is the registered proprietor of the trademark METRO in class 42 in respect of Medical Services: Hospital, Heart Institute, Pharmacy, Health Care, Specialty Hospital, Research Institute and Medical Sciences since 20.04.2007. While seeking registration of the aforesaid mark, the plaintiff claimed user since April, 1997. The second registration held by the plaintiff is also in class 42 and the trademark is Metro Heart Institute registered on 20.04.2007, again claiming user since 02.04.1997. Th...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »