Delhi Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ashok Agarwal and ors. Vs. Amar Ujala Publications Ltd. and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2012
$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:17.12.2012 + CO.A(SB) 103/2012 ASHOK AGARWAL & ORS ..... Appellants Through: Mr.Yatish Mohan, Advocate. versus AMAR UJALA PUBLICATIONS LTD & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vibhu Bakhru, Sr. Advocate with Mr.ArunKathpalia, and Mr.P.R.Rajhans, Advocates for R-1 to R-7. Mr.Shank Sengupta and Ms.Priyani Deep Shah, Advocates for R-8,9 and 10. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1. This appeal has impugned the order of the Company Law Board (CLB) dated 05.10.2012 whereby the application filed by Mr.Ashok Aggarwal and others (hereinafter referred to as the appellants) seeking an amendment under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code) of the petition filed by them under Section 397 read with Section 398 of the Companies Act had been dismissed.2. This is the grievance of the appellants. Record shows that a petitioner under Section 397 read with Secti...
Tony Electronics Ltd. Vs. .......................
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2012
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:17. 12.2012 CO.PET. 167/1999 and Co. Appl. 730/2002, 167/2003, 1861/2012 IN THE MATTER OF TONY ELECTRONICS LTD. .... Petitioner Through Mr. Neeraj Yadav, Mr.Rishabh Maheshwari and Mr.Saurabh Seth, Adv. for the applicant with the applicant-Mr.Gopal Krishan. Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Adv. for the Respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1 By way of this application the applicant Gopal Kishan seeks a recall of the order dated 20.09.1999; i.e. setting aside of the scheme which had been sanctioned by this Court on 20.09.1999. This application has been filed on 22.07.2002. 2 Submission in the application being to the effect that this merger had been effected malafide behind the back of the applicant; he was a shareholder of M/s Tony Electronics Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the company) which pursuant to the order dated 20.09.1999 has merged with Super Cassettes Industries Ltd.; no information...
Bhoopendra Singh Vs. Uoi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2012
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: December 10, 2012 Judgment Pronounced on: December 17, 2012 + W.P.(C) 4874/2012 BHOOPENDRA SINGH ..... Petitioner Represented by : Mr.P.D.P.Deo, Advocate versus UOI AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by : Ms.Barkha Babbar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. The petitioner was recruited in the Indian Army and was allocated to the Rajputana Rifles and as of February 26, 2010 was working with the 14th Bn. Rajputana Rifles. He was assigned duties as the Mess Havildar of the Mini Officers Mess at Upper Sonagachi.2. The Mess Chef was one Rfn. Rajendra Singh.3. Three officers, Capt.D.C.Shekhar, Capt.Kapil Kansal and Lt.Harsh Vardhan had to depart at 05:15 hours on February 26, 2010 and thus Lt.Harsh Vardhan had instructed petitioner on February 25, 2010 that the breakfast and lunch of the three officers should be packed and delivered in the mess...
Naresh Kumar Arora Vs. State and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Crl. Rev. P.No. 652/2009 Date of Decision:17. h December, 2012 + # ! NARESH KUMAR ARORA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Dinesh Agnani, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rahul Sharma & Mr. Ritesh Sharma, Advocates. Versus $ * STATE & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP for the State Mr. S. S. Gandhi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. R.S.Malik, Mr. Shitiz Sharma & Mr. Puneet Mahendru, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER P.K.BHASIN, J: This revision petition is directed against the order dated 16 th July, 2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge whereby the order dated 11th September, 2008 of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate declining to take cognizance of any of the offences for which the petitioner-accused was charge-sheeted by the police was set aside and the matter was remitted back to the Magistrate with a direction to proceed with the charge sheet in accordance with law.2. Factual background of the case is tha...
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Rukma Devi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2012
$ 31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h December, 2012 + CM(M).1301/2012 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate. Versus RUKMA DEVI & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. A DAR (Detailed Accident Report) was filed by the Investigating Officer. As per the Agreed Claims Tribunal Procedure, an offer of `8,93,184/- was made by the Petitioner Insurance Company. A Claim Petition was preferred by the Respondents (the Claimants). The Petitioner Insurance Company was required to file its written statement on 09.12.2011. A perusal of the Trial Court record shows that on 09.12.2011, the Petitioner also required the Investigating Officer to file a complete DAR in accordance with Section 6 of the Claims Tribunal Agreed Procedure. A perusal of the Trial Court record further reveals that the issues were framed by an order dated 14.02.2012, which are extracted...
National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Smt. Krishna and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h December, 2012 + MAC.APP. 272/2012 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. versus SMT. KRISHNA & ORS. Through: + ..... Respondents Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. for the Claimant. Mr. J.P. Tiwari, Adv. for R-2 to R-4 MAC.APP. 273/2012 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. versus SMT. KRISHNA & ORS. Through: + ..... Respondents Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. for the Claimant. Mr. J.P. Tiwari, Adv. for R-2 to R-4 MAC.APP. 274/2012 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. versus MS. PAYAL & ORS. Through: + ..... Respondents Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. for the Claimant. Mr. J.P. Tiwari, Adv. for R-2 to R-4 MAC.APP. 275/2012 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. versus SMT. GOMA & ORS. Through: + ..... Respondents Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. for the Claimants/R-1 to R-5. Mr. J.P. Tiwari, Adv. for...
Ragni Chopra Vs. Rajesh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + Judgment reserved on:12. 12.2012 Judgment pronounced on:17. 12.2012 CS(OS) 1371/2002 RAGNI CHOPRA Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr Adv with Mr Jasmeet Singh, Adv. Through: ..... Defendants Ms Roma Bhagat, Adv for Ds 1,3 and 5. versus RAJESH & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.1. The plaintiff before this Court is the sister of defendant No. 1 Rajesh Malhotra and defendant No. 2 Rakesh Malhotra. Defendant No. 3 is the wife and defendants 4 and 5 are the children of defendant No.1. Property No. E-59, Vasant Marg, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi, was owned by late Shri R.M. Malhotra and late Smt. Veera Malhotra, parents of plaintiff and defendants 1 and 2. Both of them held half undivided share each in the said property. Vide Will dated 29.06.1988, Smt. Veera Malhotra bequeathed her half share in the suit property to her husband Late Shri R.M. Malhotra. Vide Will dated 03.10.1993, she bequeathed her share in the s...
National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Shri Ram Pal Giri and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h December, 2012 + MAC.APP. 276/2012 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. versus SHRI RAM PAL GIRI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. for the Claimant/R-1 & R-2. Mr. J.P. Tiwari, Adv. for R-3 to R-5 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The present Appeal is allowed in terms of the judgment passed today in MAC.APP.272/2012 titled NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. SMT. KRISHNA & ORS.2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE DECEMBER 17 2012 vk...
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Smt. Reshnu Nisha and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h December, 2012 + MAC.APP. 503/2012 BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ...... Appellant Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. versus SMT. RESHNU NISHA & ORS. Through: Nemo. ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appellant Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited impugns a judgment dated 01.02.2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby a compensation of `12,39,800/- was awarded in favour of the Respondents No.1 to 7 for the death of Mohd. Sattar who died in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 07.09.2010.2. In fact, in this case the DAR was filed which was converted into a Claim Petition under Section 166 (4) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (the Act). A legal offer was given by the Appellant Insurance Company as recorded in the order dated 16.05.2011 which was not accepted by Respondents No.1 to 7.3. The Claims T...
Canara Bank Vs. Naresh Kumar Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2012
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 439/2005 and CM APPL Nos. 335/2005 and 21644/2010. Reserved on:31. t August, 2012 Decided on:17. h December, 2012 % CANARA BANK Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Naveen R. Nath and Mr. Darpan K.M., Advocates. versus NARESH KUMAR GUPTA Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Amandeep Joshi and Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocates Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA 1 By the present petition the Petitioner impugnes the award dated 4 th October, 2004 whereby the learned Tribunal after holding that the enquiry was fair and legal re-appreciated the evidence placed before the enquiry officer and came to the conclusion that the charges against the Respondent were not proved and hence the action of the Petitioner in dismissing the Respondent from services with effect from 13th June, 1998 was neither just nor proper and valid. It was directed that the Respondent be reinstated with effect from 13th June, 1998 with full back wage...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »