Delhi Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R.K. Rohilla (Deceased) Through Lrs ` Vs. Syndicate Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2012
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h December, 2012 + LPA 622/2012 & CM No.15799/2012 (for stay) R.K. ROHILLA (DECEASED) THROUGH LRS ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Ajit Nair, Advocate. Versus SYNDICATE BANK Through: .... Respondent Mr. S.K. Taneja, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Puneet Taneja and Mr. Anand Kumar Singh, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.This intra court appeal impugns the judgment dated 13th August, 2012 of the learned Single Judge allowing W.P.(C) No.1888/2006 preferred by the respondent Bank. The said writ petition was preferred impugning the Award dated 3rd October, 2005 of the Industrial Adjudicator on the following reference: Whether the action of the Assistant General Manager, Syndicate Bank, Zonal Office, 6 Bhagwan Dass Road, New Delhi in dismissing from services to Shri R.K. Rohilla, Clerk of Syndicate Bank, G.B. Road Branch, Emp. No.315331, New Delhi with effect from 2...
Green Industries Private Limited and anr. Vs. ........................ ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2012
39 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:17.12.2012 (ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) COMPANY APPLICATION (M) No. 188 OF 201.IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 (1 OF 1956.SECTIONS 39 & 394 AND IN THE MATTER OF SCHEME OF ARRANGEMENT FOR DEMERGER OF REAL ESTATE DIVISION OF GREEN INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED IN THE MATTER OF GREEN INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED APPLICANT/DEMERG ED COMPANY NO. 1 AND BERRY PROJECTS LIMITED Through: PRIVATE APPLICANT/RESULTA NT COMPANY Mr. Mukesh Sukhija Advocate for the Applicants CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1. This is a first motion joint Application under sections 391 & 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, in connection with the Scheme of Arrangement for de-merger of Real Estate Division of GREEN INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED (Demerged Company) into BERRY PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED (Resultant Company). A copy of the proposed Scheme of Arrangement is filed along with the Application.2. The registered offices of bot...
National Insurance Company Ltd Vs. Shri Krishan and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h December, 2012 + MAC.APP. 279/2012 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. versus SHRI KRISHAN & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Anshuman Bal, Adv. for the Claimant/R-1. Mr. J.P. Tiwari, Adv. for R-2 to R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The present Appeal is dismissed in terms of the judgment passed today in MAC.APP.272/2012 titled NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. SMT. KRISHNA & ORS.2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE DECEMBER 17 2012 vk...
Smt. Shaheen Parveen and anr. Vs. Sh. Kamlesh Kumar and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h December, 2012 + MAC.APP. 769-770/2005 SMT. SHAHEEN PARVEEN & ANR. Through: Mr. Adv. ..... Appellants versus SH. KAMLESH KUMAR & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Shivali Bansal, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) CM APPL._____/2012 (to be numbered) 1. This Application is for deletion of name of Appellant No.2. The Appellant No.2 Firazuddin has expired on 18.06.2012. A Death Certificate issued by Sub Registrar, East Delhi Municipal Corporation of Delhi has been placed on record.2. In this view of, name of Appellant No.2 is deleted from the array of parties. Amended memo of parties may be filed within seven days.3. The Application stands disposed of. MAC.APP. 769-770/2005 4. The Appeal is for enhancement of compensation of `2,16,344/- awarded for the death of Mohd. Alam in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 20.02.2002.5. In the absence of any Appeal by the driver, owner or ...
Smt.Nattho Vs. Smt.Veena Rani Aggarwal and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2012
$~ R-99 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h December, 2012 + MAC. APP. 711/2005 SMT.NATTHO Through: ..... Appellant Mr.J.S.Kanwar, Advocate. Versus SMT.VEENA RANI AGGARWAL & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appeal is for enhancement of compensation of ` 1,66,500/- awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) in favour of Appellant Smt. Nattho for having suffered injuries in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 09.11.1999 resulting in permanent disability of above 40% in respect of the left lower limb on account of the malunited fracture of ankle/feet.2. In the absence of any Appeal by the driver; the owner or the insurer of the offending vehicle; the finding on negligence has attained finality.3. The Appellant suffered crush injuries on her left foot and knee. Immediately after the accident, the Appellant was removed to Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, S...
Aditya Goyal Vs. D.D.a
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) No. 2222/2001 17th December, 2012 % ADITYA GOYAL Through: ...... Plaintiff Mr. Atul Nigam, Advocate. VERSUS D.D.A Through: ......Defendant Mr. Rajiv Bansal and Mr. Rahul Bhandari, Adv. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This suit is listed for final arguments. Counsel for both the parties have been heard with respect to overall perspectives qua the different issues which arise in this case. I am stating the different issues as also certain legal aspects in the present order inasmuch as, I am of the firm belief that in the present case, instead of litigation, the defendant/DDA must take a holistic view.2. The disputes in the present case pertain to the property bearing no. 4, Lajpat Nagar-IV, New Delhi. With respect to subject property, a perpetual lease deed was executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff on 1.3.1996. I may note that what was sold as pe...
Gajinder Singh Bhatia Vs. the Lt. Governor and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: December 05, 2012 Pronounced on: December 17, 2012 + W.P.(C) No. 2918/1998 GAJINDER SINGH BHATIA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Amardeep Singh & Mr. Baljinder Singh, Advocates versus THE LT. GOVERNOR & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Anusuya Salwan, Mr.Vikas Sood and Mr. Kunal Kohli, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % 1. JUDGMENT Petitioner in this writ petition had initially challenged notice of 20th March, 1998 determining the Perpetual Lease Deed of 10th July, 1975 of Plot No.22, Block B, Riwari Line Industrial Area Phase I, New Delhi, (henceforth referred to as subject plot) and Communication of respondent - DDA of 14th May, 1998 (Annexure P-16) refusing to restore the aforesaid Lease Deed in question.2. While entertaining this writ petition, vide order of 10 th June, DDA towards compounding fee, etc. without prejudice to rights of both the sides. During pendency of the writ petition, respondent DDA had restor...
M/S. Rani Pushpa Kumari Devi Thru Lr???s Vs. the Embassy of Syrian Ara ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) No.2409/1991 % December 17, 2012 M/S. RANI PUSHPA KUMARI DEVI THRU LRS ...... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Kamal Mehta, Adv. VERSUS THE EMBASSY OF SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC ...... Defendant Through: Mr. Arindam Mukherjee with Ms. Gargi Tuli, Advs. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This is a suit which was filed by the plaintiff/landlady for possession and mesne profits with respect to the premises 15, Palam Marg, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi.2. It is agreed before me by counsel for the parties that the defendant has already vacated the suit premises on 4.4.2005. The tenancy was terminated with effect from 1.1.1991 and therefore I have to calculate the mesne profits payable by the defendant to the plaintiff from 1.1.1991 to 4.4.2005.3. Issues in this case were framed on 29.1.1996. The only issue therefore which I am called upon to decide is issue No.5 which reads as under:5.4. ...
Vijay Kumar Shukla Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :20. h September, 2012 DECIDED ON :17. h December, 2012 + CRL.A.No.912/2009 VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Vishal Gosain, Advocate. Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Richa Kapoor, APP for the State. + CRL.A.No.839/2009 RAJESH RAJA ..... Appellant Through : Mr.D.C.Mathur, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Satish Tamta and Ms.Nisha Narayanan, Advocates. Versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Richa Kapoor, APP for the State. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Vijay Kumar Shukla (A-1) and Rajesh Raja (A-2) impugn judgment in Sessions Crl.A.Nos.912/2009 & 839/2009 Case No.09/2008 arising out of No.48/2001, Police Station Rajender Nagar by which they were convicted for committing offences punishable under Sections 302/186/34 IPC; under Section 68 Excise Act and under Section 25/27 Arms Act and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life with fine.2. On 04.02.2001, Const.Krishan Kumar an...
icici Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd Vs. Vijender and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:17. h December, 2012 + MAC. APP. 1199/2012 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD..... Appellant Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeav, Advocate. Versus VIJENDER & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appellant Insurance Company impugns a judgment dated 17.05.2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby a compensation of ` 1,20,603/- was awarded in favour of the First Respondent for having suffered injuries in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 21.09.2006.2. The only ground urged by the learned counsel for the Appellant Insurance Company is that a notice under Order XII Rule 8 CPC was issued to the Respondent No.3, the owner of the vehicle, to produce the valid permit in respect of the vehicle not HR-39A-5147 to ply the same in the State of Haryana at the time of the accident. Despite the service of notice, the owner...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »