Delhi Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Brahamwati and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2012
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h December, 2012 + MAC. APP. 553/2012 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate. Versus BRAHAMWATI & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Pooja Goel, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The present Appeal is disposed of in terms of the judgment passed today in MAC.APP.541/2012 titled ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. PARVIN DEVI & ORS.2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE DECEMBER 18 2012 pst...
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Parvesh JaIn and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2012
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h December, 2012 + MAC. APP. 545/2012 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate. Versus PARVESH JAIN & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Pooja Goel, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The present Appeal is dismissed in terms of the judgment passed today in MAC.APP.541/2012 titled ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. PARVIN DEVI & ORS.2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE DECEMBER 18 2012 pst...
Bharti Axa General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Kailash Chand Sharma and ors ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2012
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h December, 2012 + MAC. APP. 929/2012 BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate. Versus KAILASH CHAND SHARMA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. R.K. Bachchan, Advocate for the Respondent No.1. Mr. Sushendra K. Chauhan, Advocate for the Respondents No.2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The present Appeal is disposed of in terms of the judgment passed today in MAC.APP.913/2012 titled BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. TANNU & ORS.2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE DECEMBER 18 2012 pst...
Ruqaiya Begum and anr Vs. Bashir Ahmed Khan and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:18. 12.2012 CS(OS) 1838/2011 RUQAIYA BEGUM & ANR Through: Mr Vishal Bhatnagar, Adv. ..... Plaintiffs versus BASHIR AHMED KHAN & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr N.K. Singh, Adv for D-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a suit for partition, possession, injunction and recovery of mesne profit/use and occupation charges. The plaintiffs are the sisters of the defendants. Their case is that their father late Abdul Hafeez Khan was the owner of Shop No. 5158, Ward No. XIII, Rui Mandi, Sadar Bazar, Delhi and in his lifetime, he had sold the said property to the parties to the suit vide sale deed dated 24.09.1985. It is alleged that in the year 2006, defendant No. 2 Razia Begum had instituted a suit for partition of the said property. That suit was decreed as compromised between defendant 1 Bashir Ahmed Khan and defendant 2 Razia Begum. Under the compromise, defendant No.1 paid a sum of Rs 3...
Sumit Mehta Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % BAIL APPLN. NO. 1479/2012 Date of Decision:18. h December, 2012 + # ! Sumit Mehta ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aman Lekhi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ankur Garg & Mr. Nitin Bhatia, Advocates. Versus $ ! * State of NCT of Delhi .Respondent Through: Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP for the State. Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Pranyab Pathak, Advocates for the complainant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER The petitioner accused is claiming anticipatory bail in a case registered against him vide FIR no. 104/2012 on 22.08.2012 for the offences punishable under Sections 420/467/468/471 IPC on the basis of the complaint made against him by the complainant.2. The case has been registered against four persons including the petitioner herein at the behest of the complainant Harman Jaspal on the allegations that in the year 2003 the complainant and the accused petitioner had agreed to invest money together for running a petrol pump in partnership with ...
Niranjan Lal and ors. Vs. Uoi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2012
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h December, 2012 % + LPA No.798/2012 NIRANJAN LAL & ORS. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. V. Shekhar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abhigya & Mr. Piyush Jain, Advs. Versus UOI & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Joydeep Mazumdar, Mr. Goumya Dutta & Mr. Rohit Dutta, Advs. AND LPA No.800/2012 + DHARMENDER KUMAR JAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. V. Shekhar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abhigya & Mr. Piyush Jain, Advs. Versus UOI & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Joydeep Mazumdar, Mr. Goumya Dutta & Mr. Rohit Dutta, Advs. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.These intra-court appeals impugn the judgment dated 5th November, 2012 and order dated 6th November, 2012 of the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.1398/2010 and W.P.(C) No.5153/2012 respectively preferred by the appellants. The detailed reasoning is in the judgment dated 5 th November, 2012 and which is merely followed while disposing of...
Anurag Thakur Vs. State Bank of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2012
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6234/2011 & CM No. 12556/2011 ANURAG THAKUR Through: ..... Petitioner Ms.Tara V. Ganju and Ms. Etti Sharma, Advocates. Versus STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Rajiv Kapur and Ms. Vatsala Rai, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT ORDER % 18.12.2012 W.P.(C) 6234/2011 In view of the common judgment rendered in W.P.(C) No.5267/2011, the instant petition is accordingly disposed of. CM No. 12556/2011 (for stay) With the disposal of the petition itself, the instant application has become infructuous. The same is disposed of accordingly. SURESH KAIT, J.DECEMBER 18 2012 sb...
Gnct of Delhi and ors Vs. Asi Rambir Singh and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2012
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:18. 12.2012 W.P.(C) 7680/2010 GNCT OF DELHI AND ORS ... Petitioners versus ASI RAMBIR SINGH AND ANR ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners For the Respondents : Ms Ferida Satarawala with Ms Suman Kukrety : Mr Anil Singal CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 07.05.2010 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in OA 3261/2009. The said OA had been filed by the respondents challenging the order dated 03.10.2008 passed by the Disciplinary Authority forfeiting one years approved service of the respondents and the Appellate Authoritys order dated 06.08.2009, whereby the appeal of the respondents was rejected.2. In brief, the allegation against the respondents was that they were checking vehicles / trucks coming from Ghaziabad ent...
Brig K.S. Chauhan Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2012
1. The petitioner by this petition has prayed that the record of the Selection Board may be called and respondents may be directed to place the merit of the empanelled officers vis-a-vis the petitioner to ascertain whether any mistake still exists in the MDS of the petitioner affecting his promotional prospect adversely. It is also prayed that the respondents may be directed to give fresh consideration after expunging the reports of SRO from the CRs for the period from 23.01.2009 to 30.06.2009 and 01.07.2009 to 09.01.2010. It is also prayed that respondents may be directed to calculate the vacancies as per the policy instructions existing on calculation of vacancies on PRV basis and pass further directions to consider the petitioner as promoted in case five vacancies were required to be made available at the time the petitioner was considered as fresh case in April 2012 and if he is found suitable, he may be given consequential benefits. It is also prayed that petitioner may be promote...
Mahajan Industries Private Limited Vs. ...............
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2012
40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:17.12.2012 (ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) COMPANY APPLICATION (M) No. 189 OF 201.IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 (1 OF 1956.SECTIONS 39 & 394 AND IN THE MATTER OF SCHEME OF ARRANGEMENT FOR DEMERGER OF STRATEGIC BUSINESS DIVISION OF MAHAJAN INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED IN THE MATTER OF APPLICANT/DEMERGED COMPANY NO. 1 MAHAJAN INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED AND ZEEL FINCAP SERVICES APPLICANT/RESULTANT COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED Through: Mr. Mukesh Sukhija Advocate for the Applicants CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1. This is a first motion joint Application under sections 391 & 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, in connection with the Scheme of Arrangement for de-merger of Strategic Business Division of Mahajan Industries Private Limited (Demerged Company) into Zeel Fincap Services Private Limited (Resultant Company). A copy of the proposed Scheme of Arrangement is filed along with the Application.2....
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »