Delhi Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Roopwati and ors. Vs. Nichhattar Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h December, 2012 + MAC. APP. 772/2005 SMT. ROOPWATI & ORS. Through: .... Appellants Mr.Ashok Mahajan, Advocate. Versus NICHHATTAR SINGH & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appeal is for enhancement of compensation of ` 3,10,000/- awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) in favour of the Appellants for the death of Tilak(the deceased), who died in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 06.02.2002.2. In the absence of any Appeal by the driver, owner or insurer of the vehicle not CH-01G-8830 involved in the accident, the finding on negligence has attained finality.3. During inquiry before the Claims Tribunal, it was claimed that deceased Tilak was working with Sanjay Kumar Mohindra, Shop No.3246/2, Ram Bazaar, Mori Gate, Delhi who was trading in Spare Motor Parts and he (the deceased) was getting a salary of ` 4,500/...
Raman Kumar Morwal Vs. State Bank of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2012
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8154/2011 & CM No.18354/2011 RAMAN KUMAR MORWAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sidharth Joshi, Advocate. Versus STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Rajiv Kapur and Ms. Vatsala Rai, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT ORDER % 18.12.2012 W.P.(C) 8154/2011 In view of the common judgment rendered in W.P.(C) No.5267/2011, the instant petition is accordingly disposed of. CM No.18354/2011 (for stay) With the disposal of the petition itself, the instant application has become infructuous. The same is disposed of accordingly. SURESH KAIT, J.DECEMBER 18 2012 sb...
D.T.C. Vs. Raj Kumar and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3750/2004 and CM APPL Nos. 3066/2004 and 9633/2012 Reserved on:5. h September, 2012 Decided on:18. h December, 2012 % D.T.C. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sarfaraz Khan and Mr. Mirza Amir Baig, Advocates. versus RAJ KUMAR & ORS. Through: + ..... Respondents Ms. Kittu Bajaj, Advocate. W.P.(C) 16896/2006 and CM APPL NO. 9631/2012 D.T.C. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sarfaraz Khan and Mr. Mirza Amir Baig, Advocates. versus RAJ KUMAR GUPTA & ANR. Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Kittu Bajaj, Advocate. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA 1 These writ petitions are being disposed of by this common judgment as the facts in both the petitions are common and the second one is a sequel to the first one. Respondent No.1 Raj Kumar was working as a conductor with the Petitioner during the period from January 1992 to May 1992. He unauthorizedly absented from duty for a total period of 66 days. Consequently a charge-sheet dated 21st July, 1992 was i...
Bharti Axa General Insurance Co. Ltd Vs. Bala and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2012
$ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h December, 2012 + MAC. APP. 915/2012 BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate. Versus BALA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. R.K. Bachchan, Advocate for the Respondent No.1. Mr. Sushendra K. Chauhan, Advocate for the Respondents No.2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The present Appeal is disposed of in terms of the judgment passed today in MAC.APP.913/2012 titled BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. TANNU & ORS.2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE DECEMBER 18 2012 pst...
D.T.C. Vs. Raj Kumar Gupta and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3750/2004 and CM APPL Nos. 3066/2004 and 9633/2012 Reserved on:5. h September, 2012 Decided on:18. h December, 2012 % D.T.C. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sarfaraz Khan and Mr. Mirza Amir Baig, Advocates. versus RAJ KUMAR & ORS. Through: + ..... Respondents Ms. Kittu Bajaj, Advocate. W.P.(C) 16896/2006 and CM APPL NO. 9631/2012 D.T.C. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Sarfaraz Khan and Mr. Mirza Amir Baig, Advocates. versus RAJ KUMAR GUPTA & ANR. Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Kittu Bajaj, Advocate. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA 1 These writ petitions are being disposed of by this common judgment as the facts in both the petitions are common and the second one is a sequel to the first one. Respondent No.1 Raj Kumar was working as a conductor with the Petitioner during the period from January 1992 to May 1992. He unauthorizedly absented from duty for a total period of 66 days. Consequently a charge-sheet dated 21st July, 1992 was i...
Growth Avenue Securities Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Kailashiddhi Promoters Pvt. Ltd ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2012
18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:18.12.2012 COMPANY PETITION NO.451 OF 201.In the matter of The Companies Act, 1956 Petition under Sections 391 & 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 Scheme of Amalgamation of Growth Avenue Securities Pvt. Ltd Petitioner/Transferor Company And Kailashsiddhi Promoters Pvt. Ltd Petitioner/Transferee Company Through: Mr Rajeev K Goel, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr.K.S.Pradhan, Registrar of Companies for the Regional Director (North Region). Mr.S.B.GAutam, Official Liquidator. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1. This joint Petition has been filed under sections 391 & 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 by the Petitioner Companies seeking sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation of Growth Avenue Securities Pvt. Ltd. with Kailashsiddhi Promoters Pvt. Ltd.2. The registered offices of the Petitioner Companies are situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdiction of this Court.3. Details with regard to the date...
Shiv Ram Sharma Vs. Registrar of Companies
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:18.12.2012 COMPANY PETITION NO.427 OF 201.SHIV RAM SHARMA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Suresh Kumar, Advocate. versus REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES ..... Respondent Through: Mr.K.S.Pradhan, Deputy ROC. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1 This is a petition under Section 560(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 filed by the petitioner Shiv Ram Sharma, one of the promoter director of M/s Shiv Ram Builder Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the company) seeking restoration of the company which has been struck off by the Registrar of Companies (ROC). 2 The company was incorporated on 02.3.1990; registered office of the company is situated at 13, Amar Colony, New Delhi. In the year 2006 management of the company appointed a new Chartered Accountant to look after the companys affair i.e. compliance of income tax, compliances of ROC and other relevant work; the Chartered Accountant has not fulfilled compliance o...
Sapna K.C. and ors. Vs. Azad Khan and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2012
$ 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h December, 2012 + MAC. APP. 1164/2012 SAPNA K.C. & ORS. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. O.P. Mannie, Advocate. Versus AZAD KHAN & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appeal is for enhancement of compensation of `6,85,900/- awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(the Claims Tribunal) awarded in favour of the Appellants for the death of K.C. Gokran who died in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 06.10.2010.2. In the absence of any Appeal by the driver, owner or the insurer of the offending vehicle, the finding on negligence has attained finality.3. During the inquiry before the Claims Tribunal, it was claimed that the deceased was a self employed person earning `10,000/- per month. In cross-examination of PW2, it came on record that the deceased was working as a halwai. In the absence of any evidence with regard to the deceaseds inc...
Prem and ors. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2012
* HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 1142/2011 Decided on :18. 12.2012 PREM & ORS. Appellants Through: Mr.Anurag Jain, Advocate. Versus STATE Respondent Through : Mr.Sunil Sharma, APP CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.B. no.645/2012 1. This is an application filed by the appellant no.1 for suspension of sentence and grant of bail.2. Briefly stated the facts of the prosecutions case against the appellants are that an FIR no.369/2003, dated 06.10.2003, under Section 498A/406/304B/34 IPC was registered on the direction of SDM, Narela. The SDM had recorded the statement of Rai Singh, father of the deceased who had stated that his daughter Anita (since deceased) got married to Rajkumar, resident of Village & PO Khera Khurd, Delhi about 4 years ago. He alleged in his statement that the deceased was being harassed and beaten by her mother in law and brother in law for demand of dowry right from the beginning. Amount of `10,000/- and `33,000/- was given to ...
Dharmender Kumar JaIn Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2012
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. h December, 2012 % + LPA No.798/2012 NIRANJAN LAL & ORS. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. V. Shekhar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abhigya & Mr. Piyush Jain, Advs. Versus UOI & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Joydeep Mazumdar, Mr. Goumya Dutta & Mr. Rohit Dutta, Advs. AND LPA No.800/2012 + DHARMENDER KUMAR JAIN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. V. Shekhar, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abhigya & Mr. Piyush Jain, Advs. Versus UOI & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Joydeep Mazumdar, Mr. Goumya Dutta & Mr. Rohit Dutta, Advs. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.These intra-court appeals impugn the judgment dated 5th November, 2012 and order dated 6th November, 2012 of the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.1398/2010 and W.P.(C) No.5153/2012 respectively preferred by the appellants. The detailed reasoning is in the judgment dated 5 th November, 2012 and which is merely followed while disposing of...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »