Delhi Court November 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Cit Vs. Delhi Industries and Enterprises
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on 29.11.2012 + ITA 392/2012, C.M. APPL. 11592/2012 & 11593/2012 + ITA 393/2012, C.M. APPL. 11594/2012 & 11595/2012 + ITA 403/2012, C.M. APPL. 11602/2012 & 11603/2012 + ITA 420/2012, C.M. APPL. 11630/2012 + ITA 428/2012, C.M. APPL. 12332/2012 & 12333/2012 CIT ..... Appellant Through : Sh. N.P. Sahni, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus DELHI INDUSTRIES & ENTERPRISES ..... Respondent Through : Sh. Salil Aggarwal, Sh. Anil Sharma, Advocates and Sh. Ravi Pratap Mall, Advocates CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) 1. The Revenue claims to be aggrieved by the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 31.10.2011 for the Assessment Years 2002-03 and ITA No. 2303/Del/2010 of the Revenue for the ITA392/12, ITA 393/12, ITA 403/12, ITA 420/12 & ITA 428/12 Page 1 Assessment Year 2005-06. The question of law sought to be urged is as to the: (a) correctness of the Tribunals...
Cit Vs. Delhi Industries and Enterprises
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on 29.11.2012 + ITA 392/2012, C.M. APPL. 11592/2012 & 11593/2012 + ITA 393/2012, C.M. APPL. 11594/2012 & 11595/2012 + ITA 403/2012, C.M. APPL. 11602/2012 & 11603/2012 + ITA 420/2012, C.M. APPL. 11630/2012 + ITA 428/2012, C.M. APPL. 12332/2012 & 12333/2012 CIT ..... Appellant Through : Sh. N.P. Sahni, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus DELHI INDUSTRIES & ENTERPRISES ..... Respondent Through : Sh. Salil Aggarwal, Sh. Anil Sharma, Advocates and Sh. Ravi Pratap Mall, Advocates CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) 1. The Revenue claims to be aggrieved by the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 31.10.2011 for the Assessment Years 2002-03 and ITA No. 2303/Del/2010 of the Revenue for the ITA392/12, ITA 393/12, ITA 403/12, ITA 420/12 & ITA 428/12 Page 1 Assessment Year 2005-06. The question of law sought to be urged is as to the: (a) correctness of the Tribunals...
Jitender Vs. State and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Crl. M.C. No. 2287/2012 Date of Decision:29. h November, 2012 + # ! JITENDER Through: ....Petitioner Mr. O.P. Wadhwa& Ms. Ritu Gupta, Advocates Versus $ * STATE & ANR. Through: Respondents Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP for State with W/ASI Ms.Darshna, PS Mianwali Nagar Mr.RajatGulati, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER P.K.BHASIN, J: This petition has been filed by the petitioner-accused under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of the FIR no. 94/2012 dated 26th April, 2012 registered against him at Mianwali Nagar Police Stationat the instance of respondent no. 2 under Sections 376/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.2. During investigation the respondent no. 2/ complainant, however, had made a statement on 30/04/2012under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Magistrate exonerating the petitioner against whom she had in her FIR alleged that he had raped her. However, the police cha...
Cit Vs. Delhi Industries and Enterprises
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on 29.11.2012 + ITA 392/2012, C.M. APPL. 11592/2012 & 11593/2012 + ITA 393/2012, C.M. APPL. 11594/2012 & 11595/2012 + ITA 403/2012, C.M. APPL. 11602/2012 & 11603/2012 + ITA 420/2012, C.M. APPL. 11630/2012 + ITA 428/2012, C.M. APPL. 12332/2012 & 12333/2012 CIT ..... Appellant Through : Sh. N.P. Sahni, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus DELHI INDUSTRIES & ENTERPRISES ..... Respondent Through : Sh. Salil Aggarwal, Sh. Anil Sharma, Advocates and Sh. Ravi Pratap Mall, Advocates CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) 1. The Revenue claims to be aggrieved by the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 31.10.2011 for the Assessment Years 2002-03 and ITA No. 2303/Del/2010 of the Revenue for the ITA392/12, ITA 393/12, ITA 403/12, ITA 420/12 & ITA 428/12 Page 1 Assessment Year 2005-06. The question of law sought to be urged is as to the: (a) correctness of the Tribunals...
National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Anil Kumar and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h November, 2012 + MAC.APP. 244/2010 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ...... Appellant Through: Mr. Vivek Singh, Adv. for Ms. Neelam Singh, Adv. versus ANIL KUMAR & ORS. Through: + ..... Respondents Mr. Dharmesh Kumar Proxy Counsel for Mr. Sushil Kumar, Adv. for R-1/ Claimant. MAC.APP. 258/2010 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ...... Appellant Through: Mr. Vivek Singh, Adv. for Ms. Neelam Singh, Adv. versus SUNIL KUMAR & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Dharmesh Kumar Proxy Counsel for Mr. Sushil Kumar, Adv. for R-1/ Claimant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) CM APPL.7010/2010 (delay of 24 days) in MAC APP.244/2010 CM APPL.7467/2010 (delay of 90 days) in MAC APP.258/2010 1. Delay of 24 days and 90 days in filing the respective Appeals is condoned. The Applications are allowed.2. The Appellant National Insurance Company Limited impugns a judgment dated 08.10.2009 passed by the Motor Acci...
Jasbir Kaur and ors. Vs. State and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2012
2 $~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1096/2011 & Crl.M.A. Nos. 2903-2904/2012, 29062907/2012 JASBIR KAUR & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Rohit Sharma with Mr. Amarjeet Singh, Advocates versus STATE & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Jasbir Kaur, APP for State with SI Madhurendra Kumar, DIU/SD Mr. N. Hariharan with Mr. Vaibhav Sharma and Mr. Saurabh Soni, Advocates for respondent No. 2 Date of Decision:29. h November, 2012 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (ORAL):1. Present petition has been filed seeking quashing of FIR No. 184/2010 registered with Police Station Mehrauli, Delhi by respondent No.2 under Sections 406/498A/376/420/506/120B IPC and Sections 3 & 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.2. A perusal of the cause list reveals that upon a petition being filed by three other co-accused for quashing of the same FIR being Crl.M.C. No. 864/201, another learned Single Judge of this Court dismissed the said petition vide order dated 08th ...
icici Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Smt. Sheela Devi and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h November, 2012 + MAC.APP. 974/2011 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Suman Bagga, Adv. versus SMT. SHEELA DEVI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Adv. for R-1 to R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appeal is for reduction of compensation of `20,84,681/- awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) in favour of the Respondents No.1 to 5 for the death of Amar Singh who died in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 18.08.2008.2. The finding on negligence is not challenged by the Appellant Insurance Company; thus the same has attained finality.3. The only ground of challenge raised is that the deceased was on leave from April, 2008 to July, 2008. He did not receive any salary during this period. In the month of August, he received salary for just one day. He expired on 18.08.2008 and therefore, th...
Bhasker Mahalik Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :27. h SEPTEMBER, 2012 DECIDED ON :29. h November, 2012 + CRL.A. 327/2011 BHASKER MAHALIK Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Joginder Tuli, Advocate with Mr.Aekansh Shukla, Advocate. versus STATE Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Richa Kapoor, APP. CRL.A. 328/2011 NIRANJAN MAHALIK Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Joginder Tuli, Advocate with Mr.Aekansh Shukla, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Richa Kapoor, APP. CRL.A. 329/2011 JAGBANDHU DASS Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Joginder Tuli, Advocate with Mr.Aekansh Shukla, Advocate. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Richa Kapoor, APP. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.The present appeals are dismissed in terms of a detailed common judgment delivered today which is placed in the file of Crl.A.No.326/2011 titled Bhawgan Mahalik versus State (NCT of Delhi). (S.P.GARG) JUDGE (SANJIV KHANNA) JUDGE November 29, 2012 sa...
Tejinder Singh Dagar Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: November 29, 2012 + W.P.(C) 6302/2012 TEJINDER SINGH DAGAR ..... Petitioner Represented by: Ms.Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate instructed by Mr.Sanjeev Chaswal, Mr.Amandeep Joshi, Mr.Tinu Bajwa and Mr.Dinesh Yadav, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Represented by: [ ..... Respondents Mr.Rajan Sabharwal, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HONBLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(ORAL) CM No.18750/2012 1. Hearing of the application is preponed. The date February 08, 2013 is cancelled.2. The application is formal. The original writ petition challenged the order levying penalty and the prayer made is to permit the petitioner to challenge the appellate order dated November 17, 2011 and the revisional order dated February 29, 2012, both of which uphold the penalty levied.3. We find that the two orders have been annexed with the writ petition as Annexure-P5 (collectively) but without a formal pray...
Prem Lata Vs. Raghubir Rai and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:29. 11.2012 CS(OS) 1863/2010 RAGHBIR RAI & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr Mayank Mikhail Mukherjee, Adv versus PREM LATA & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr Ashok Gurmani, Adv. AND + CS(OS) 1698/2011 PREM LATA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr Ashok Gurmani, Adv. versus RAGHUBIR RAI & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr Mayank Mikhail Mukherjee, Adv CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) IAs No. 12120/2010 (O. 39 R. 1&2 CPC) and 3478/2011 (O. 39 R. 4 CPC) in CS(OS) 1863/2010 and IA No.11080/2011 (O. 39 R. 1 and 2 CPC) in CS(OS) 1698/2011 1. CS(OS) No. 1863/2010 is a suit for permanent injunction. The case of the plaintiffs in this suit is that they are the tenants of defendant No. 1 in respect of ground and first floor of Property not D-2/12, Model Town-III, Delhi-110 009, where they are running a restaurant by the name Dragon Hucks Restaurant. Defendant No. 2 was the husband of defendant No. 1, whereas def...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »