Delhi Court November 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sri Ram Sayal and Sons Engineers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/S. Indian Railway Con ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (Not reportable) O.M.P. No. 491 of 2009 Reserved on:17. h September, 2012 Decision on:1. t November, 2012 SRI RAM SAYAL & SONS ENGINEERS PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Jauhar, Advocate. Versus M/S. INDIAN RAILWAY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (IRCON) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. K.R. Gupta & Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT 01 11.2012 IA No. 4392 o1. These are objections filed by M/s. Indian Railway Construction Company (IRCON) under Sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (Act) to an Award dated 14th July 2009 passed by the sole Arbitrator in the disputes between IRCON and the Petitioner, Sri Ram Sayal & Sons Engineers Pvt. Ltd. (SRS) arising out of a contract executed between the parties, in terms of which the work of widening and strengthening of four lanes between a portion of National Highway (NH) No. 1 was awarded by IRCON to SRS. The main work in relation to the project of construction of fo...
Shyam Sunder Vs. Smt. Manju Devi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t November, 2012 + MAC.APP. 651/2012 SHYAM SUNDER Through: ..... Appellant Nemo. versus SMT. MANJU DEVI & ORS. .... Respondents Through: Mr.S.N.Parashar, Advocate for R-1 to R5 Mr.Naresh C.Sharma, Advocate for R-7 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The present Appeal is disposed of in terms of the judgment passed today in MAC APP. 647/2012 titled SMT. SUMAN. v. SMT. MANJU DEVI & ORS.2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE NOVEMBER 01 2012 v...
Smt. Suman Vs. Smt. Manju Devi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t November, 2012 + MAC. APP. 647/2012 SMT. SUMAN Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Naresh C.Sharma, Advocate versus + SMT. MANJU DEVI & ORS. .... Respondents Through: Mr.S.N.Parashar, Advocate for R-1 to R5 MAC. APP. 651/2012 SHYAM SUNDER Through: ..... Appellant Nemo. versus SMT. MANJU DEVI & ORS. .... Respondents Through: Mr.S.N.Parashar, Advocate for R-1 to R5 Mr.Naresh C.Sharma, Advocate for R-7 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. These two Appeals (MAC. APP. 647/2012 & MAC. APP. 651/2012) arise out of a judgment dated 30th January, 2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby a Claim Petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (the Act) filed by Respondents No.1 to 5 was allowed and a compensation of ` 8,70,924/- along with interest @ 7.5% per annum from 15.04.2006 till the date of payment was granted.2. During the course of arguments, it w...
Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. Smt. Shakeela Parveen and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t November, 2012 + MAC. APP. 658/2007 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ... Appellant Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate versus SMT. SHAKEELA PARVEEN & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The sole question raised for determination in the instant Appeal is whether deceased Zamil suffered death in an accident arising out of use of motor vehicle, that is, DTC bus not DL-1P-9753 2. The facts of the case are not very much in dispute. Joginder Singh, the driver of the DTC bus was driving the bus from ISBT to Anand Vihar. Some passengers boarded the bus from Shastri Park, Seelampur and Bihari Colony. At about 7:00 A.M., the bus reached near Jagat Puri when the driver heard an alarm that money has been removed from the pocket. The driver also noticed that somebody had placed a knife at his neck. Thereafter, the person (who had held the kn...
icici Lombard General Insurance Co.Ltd. Vs. Rani Verma and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t November, 2012 + MAC. APP. 900/2012 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Suman Bagga, Advocate versus RANI VERMA & ORS. Through: .... Respondents Mr.Amit Kumar Pandey, Advocate for R1 to R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appeal is for reduction of compensation of ` 9,35,580/- awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) in favour of Respondents No.1 and 2 for the death of their son Ankit Chauhan, a bachelor, who died in a motor vehicle accident, which occurred on 28.11.2010.2. The only ground of challenge raised by the learned counsel for the Appellant Insurance Company is that the multiplier ought to have been applied as per the age of the deceaseds mother. The Claims Tribunal erred in applying the multiplier as per the age of the deceased.3. It is well settled that in a Claim Petition filed by the legal representatives fo...
M/S D??cor India (P) Ltd. Vs. Delhi Stock Exchange Association Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2012
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :November 01, 2012 + RFA(OS) 77/2012 M/S DCOR INDIA (P) LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by : Mr.Akhil Sibal, Advocate with Ms. Vidhi Goel and Mr.Amit Aggarwal, Advocates. versus DELHI STOCK EXCHANGE ASSOCIATION LTD. ..... Respondent Represented by : None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. In spite of being served none appears for the respondent at the hearing today. Record shows that no vakalatnama has been filed by any counsel on behalf of the respondent after it was served with a notice of the appeal being admitted.2. The respondent invited offers as per tender documents for renovation and re-doing interior works for its building at plot No.3/1, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi as also for another building at plot No.3,4/4B, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi.3. Architect Ashok B.Lall and Shekhar Bhargava were appointed as Lead Consultant and Executive Architect re...
Dda and anr. Vs. Pt.Munshi Ram and Associates (P) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. 10.2012 Date of Decision:01. 11.2012 + FAO (OS) 734/2006 M/S PT. MUNSHI RAM & ASSOCATES ... Appellant Through : Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate. versus DDA Through : ... Respondent Mr. Arun Birbal, Advocate. AND + FAO (OS) 59/2007 DDA & ANR. ... Appellants Through : Mr. Arun Birbal, Adv. versus PT.MUNSHI RAM & ASSOCIATES (P) LTD. ... Respondent Through : Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.1. M/s. Pt. Munshi Ram & Associates (P) Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as, the Contractor) was awarded the work of construction of dwelling units in Vasant Kunj, New Delhi by Delhi Development _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Authority (hereinafter referred to as, DDA) vide Agreement No. 18/EE/HD-II/84-85. One of the sites where flats were to be constructed was in SectorC, Pocket9, Vasa...
Nirmala and anr Vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:1. t November, 2012 + MAC.APP. 1151/2012 NIRMALA & ANR Through: ..... Appellants Mr.S.K.Pandey, Adv versus ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Pradeep Gaur, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The present Appeal is disposed in terms of the judgment passed today in MAC APP. 869/2010 titled ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. NIRMALA & ORS.2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE NOVEMBER 01 2012 vk...
Jagdambay Auto Station and anr Vs. Uoi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:09. 10.2012 % Judgment delivered on:01. 11.2012 + W.P.(C) 6398/2010 & C.M. No. 12662/2010 JAGDAMBAY AUTO STATION AND ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Aman Lekhi, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Pramod Jalan, Ms. Srishti Saxsena & Mr. Manoj Gupta, Advocates. versus UOI AND ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Neeraj Chaudhari, CGSC, for the respondent No. 1/UOI. Mr. M.M. Kalra & Mr. Kunal Kalra, Advocates for the respondent No. 2/IOCL. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The petitioners have preferred the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to seek a declaration that the termination letter dated 22.02.2010, terminating the petitioners dealership as a dealer of respondent No. 2 Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) in respect of petrol, high-speed diesel, motor oil, grease, etc. is arbitrary; is issued in colourable exercise of power, and; is disproportionate to the al...
M/S B. Kumaragowda and Sons Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:06. 09.2012 Date of Decision:01. 11.2012 + W.P.(C) 9000/2011 M/S B. KUMARAGOWDA & SONS ... Petitioner Through : Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Yashraj Deora, Mr. Sriram Krishna, Ms. Anupama Dhruva and Mr. Sameer Abhyankar, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through : ... Respondents Mr. Neeraj Chaudhari,CGSC with Mr. Saquib and Mr. Ravjyot Singh, Advs. for R1 / UOI. R 2 ex-parte vide Order dated 17.07.2012. Mr. S.K. Bagaria, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Kirti Mishra, Adv. for R 3.CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.1. The petitioner firm seeks to impugn the notification dated 21.10.2011 issued by the Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 17A(1A) of The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 (hereinafter _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ referred to as, the sai...
- ‹ Prev
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 53
- 54
- Next ›
- Last »