Delhi Court November 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
B.K.Rohtagi Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-05-2012
$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:5. h November, 2012 % + W.P.(C) 6938/2012 B.K.ROHTAGI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Mohit K. Shah, Advocate. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS Through: ..... Respondents None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) CM No.18041/2012 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. + W.P.(C) 6938/2012 1. Vide the instant petition, the petitioner seeks issuance of directions to the respondents to condone the period of interruption between two spells of service rendered by him in Rohtagi A.B. Senior Secondary School, Delhi i.e. the period from 07.07.1969 to 02.11.1970 and count the pre-interruption service as qualifying service for the purposes of calculation of the retirement benefits.2. He also seeks directions to treat the period starting from 04.09.1956 to 30.09.1998 as the period of qualifying service for the purposes of calculation of reti...
Bannari Amman Exports Ltd. Vs. Jagson Airlines Ltd. and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-05-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. 238 of 2012 Reserved on:17. h October, 2012 Decision on:5. h November, 2012 BANNARI AMMAN EXPORTS LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Indu Malhotra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vansdeep Dalmia and Ms. Nishtha Kumar, Advocates for R-1. Versus JAGSON AIRLINES LTD. & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sakal Bhushan, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Mr. Jayant Nath, Senior Advocate with Mr. Udit Gupta, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR % JUDGMENT 05 11.2012 1. This Court has today by a separate order disposed of OMP Nos. 478 and 482 of 2006, substantially upholding the Award dated 10th July 2006. Subject to the Petitioner filing an execution petition within the prescribed time, in accordance with law, the Respondents are restrained from disposing of any of their immovable assets, till such time orders are passed by the concerned Court in the execution petition.2. The petition is disposed of in the above terms. S. MURALIDHAR, J NOVEMBER 05 20...
The Gondals Press Vs. Punjab National Bank and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-05-2012
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:5. h November, 2012 % + LPA No.731/2012 THE GONDALS PRESS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ajay Kapur, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Amitabh Narayan, Advs. Versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Rajat Sharma, Adv. for R-4. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.This intra-court appeal impugns the order dated 31.10.2012 of the learned Single Judge of dismissal of W.P.(C) No.3721/2012 preferred by the appellant. The said writ petition was filed impugning the order dated 31.05.2012 of the District Judge exercising powers as an Appellate Authority under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 (PP Act) dismissing the appeal preferred by the appellant against the order dated 27.03.2012 of the Estate Officer of the respondent Bank of eviction of the appellant from an area comprising of 2223 sq. ft. on the Ground and Mezzanine Floor of property...
Bhole Baba Dairy Industries Limited Vs. Bhle Baba Mil Food Industries ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-05-2012
$~A33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:05.11.2012 CO. APPL. (M) NO.174 OF 201.IN THE MATTER OF SCHEME OF MERGER OF BHOLE BABA DAIRY INDUSTRIES LIMITED Transferor Company With BHLE BABA MIL FOOD INDUSTRIES LIMITED Transferee Company Through: Mr. Saurabh Kalia and Mr.Sameer Chaudhary, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1. This is a first motion joint Application under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, (for short Act) in connection with the Scheme of Amalgamation (for short Scheme) between Bhole Baba Dairy Industries limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferor Company) and Bhole Baba Milk Food Industries Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferee Company). A copy of the proposed Scheme is filed along with the application as Annexure-A8.2. The registered offices of the Transferor and Transferee Companies are situated within the National Capital Territory of Delhi and are within the jurisdiction of ...
Lekh Raj and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-05-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: October 11, 2012 Pronounced on: November 05, 2012 + (i) W.P.(C) No. 5175/1998 & CM No. 14513/2010 GURDAS RAM & ORS. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. M.K. Singh, Advocate for petitioners No.1, 3, 4 & 6 Mr. G.K. Sharma, Advocate for petitioners no.2 and 5. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Joydeep Mazumdar, Mr.Rohit Dutta, Ms. Soumya Dutta, & Ms.Samina Sheikh, Advocates for respondents No. 1 to 3. Mr. Saurav Aggarwal, Advocate for R-4/IRCTC + (ii) W.P.(C) No.4566/2001 ROSHAN LAL & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. K.C. Mittal & Ms. Anjali Nehra, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Joydeep Mazumdar, Mr.Rohit Dutta, Ms. Soumya Dutta, & Ms.Samina Sheikh, Advocates for respondent - Northern Railways + (iii) W.P.(C) No.2502/2003 ALL INDIA VENDORS ASSOCIATION ... Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj Saxena & Mr. Shwetank Sailakwal, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents ...
Pankaj Kumar Singh Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-05-2012
$~44 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:5. h November, 2012 W.P.(C) No. 6963/2012 PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.Anilendra Pandey and Ms.Priya Kashyap, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Respondent None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Vide the instant petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 05.10.2011 issued by the Disciplinary Authority, Rajya Sabha Secretariat, whereby the petitioner has been removed from services with retrospective effect as on dated 04.10.2011. Also seeks setting aside of the order dated 14.09.2012 issued by the Chairman, Rajya Sabha while exercising its appellate jurisdiction.2. The instant petition has been filed basically on the ground of disproportionate punishment as the alleged charges are not so grave deserving the ultimate punishment of removal from service.3. Brief facts of the case are that the petitioner had joined the Rajya Sabha Secretaria...
Ashwani Sharma Vs. Upender Nayyar and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-05-2012
$~ 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:5. h November, 2012 + MAC. APP. 58/2010 ASHWANI SHARMA Through ..... Appellant Mr.Suneet Nagpal, Advocate versus UPENDER NAYYAR & ANR ..... Respondents Through None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appeal is for enhancement of compensation of `59,276/- awarded in favour of the Appellant by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(the Claims Tribunal) for having suffered injuries in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 26.06.1991.2. In the absence of any Appeal by the driver, owner or the insurer, the finding on negligence has attained finality.3. Immediately after the accident, the Appellant was removed to Dr. R.M.L. Hospital. He was found to have suffered lacerated wound on the left upper arm, left elbow and on the left hand. After treatment, the Appellant was discharged from the hospital on 29.06.1991. He did not recover from the injury and was admitted in Safdarjang Hospital o...
MobIn Vs. Master Kausar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-05-2012
$~ 51 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:5. h November, 2012 + CM(M). 1196/2012 MOBIN Through ..... Petitioner Mr.S.D. Ansari, Advocate versus MASTER KAUSAR Through ..... Respondent None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT CM. No.18741/2012 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Petitioner takes exception to an order dated 31.10.2012 passed by the Lower Appellate Court whereby RCT Appl. 29/2012 against an order dated 03.10.2012 passed by the Additional Rent Controller (North-East) was dismissed.2. An Eviction Petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 was preferred by the Respondent from a suit premises situated at 410, Gali No.19, Main Road, Jafrabad, Delhi. After hearing both the parties, the Application for leave to defend filed by the Petitioner was dismissed by an order dated 17.01.2011. The Petitioner unsuccessfully challenged the eviction order by...
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Devi Dass and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-05-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:5. h November, 2012 + MAC. APP. 458/2012 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ... Appellant Through: Mr. Tarkeshwar Nath, Adv. with Mr. Saurabh Kumar Tuteja, Adv. versus DEVI DASS & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. R.S. Rai, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appeal is for reduction of compensation of `1,00,000/- awarded for the death of Kailash, a young boy aged 22 years. The First Respondent Devi Dass who filed this Claim Petition is the uncle of the deceased. The First Respondent got the deceaseds name entered in his ration card (Ex.PW-1/1) only on 29.08.2011, that is, after the accident and death on 06.12.2011. It was proved that the deceased was not residing with the First Respondent.2. Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) in the absence of any evidence with regard to Kailashs income took the minimum wages of an unskilled worker, applied the multiplier o...
Sh. Anand Kumr Tyagi Vs. Shri P.K. Tripathi, Chief Secretary and Anoth ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Nov-05-2012
(ORAL) Shri G George Paracken: This contempt petition has been filed for the alleged non implementation of the order of this Tribunal dated 03.01.2012 in OA No.1497/2011. The relevant part of the said order reads as under:- ..Accordingly, this OA is allowed. The respondent (DSSSB) is directed to include the name of the applicant in the select list of selected candidates and forward his dossier to the user department within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of the dossier, the user department shall complete the codal formalities within one month thereafter and appoint him as TGT English (Male) as in the case of the other candidates who have already appointed in terms of the advertisement dated 29.1.2010, and 20.2.2010, subject to his fulfillment of other conditions for such appointment with all consequential benefits except back wages. There shall be no order as to costs. 2. Today when the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel fo...
- ‹ Prev
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- Next ›
- Last »