Delhi Court November 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bibek Debroy Vs. Dipavali Debroy and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:06. 11.2012 + CS(OS) No.116/2008, IA No.3041/2010(u/s 151 CPC) and IA No.17440/2012(u/O 2.R.1 & 2 CPC) DIPAVALI DEBROY ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr.Rohit Kumar, Advocate. versus BIBEK DEBROY & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr.P.Banerjee, Advocate And + CS(OS) No.670/2009, IA No.11622/2009(u/S 15.CPC) and IA No.17441/2012(u/O 2.R.1 & 3 CPC) BIBEK DEBROY ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr.P.Banerjee, Advocate versus DIPAVALI DEBROY & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr.Rohit Kumar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) 1. CS(OS) No.116/2008 has been filed by Smt.Dipavali Debroy, wife of defendant No.1 in that suit against Shri Bibek Debroy and five others seeking declaration, cancellation and injunction. The case set out in the plaint is that property bearing Flat No.6410(Ground Floor), Pocket C-6 & 7, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, Flat No.67(First Floor) in Block-F, Sushant Lok-II, Gurgaon and the Time Shar...
Dipavali Debroy Vs. Bibek Debroy and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:06. 11.2012 + CS(OS) No.116/2008, IA No.3041/2010(u/s 151 CPC) and IA No.17440/2012(u/O 2.R.1 & 2 CPC) DIPAVALI DEBROY ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr.Rohit Kumar, Advocate. versus BIBEK DEBROY & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr.P.Banerjee, Advocate And + CS(OS) No.670/2009, IA No.11622/2009(u/S 15.CPC) and IA No.17441/2012(u/O 2.R.1 & 3 CPC) BIBEK DEBROY ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr.P.Banerjee, Advocate versus DIPAVALI DEBROY & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr.Rohit Kumar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) 1. CS(OS) No.116/2008 has been filed by Smt.Dipavali Debroy, wife of defendant No.1 in that suit against Shri Bibek Debroy and five others seeking declaration, cancellation and injunction. The case set out in the plaint is that property bearing Flat No.6410(Ground Floor), Pocket C-6 & 7, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, Flat No.67(First Floor) in Block-F, Sushant Lok-II, Gurgaon and the Time Shar...
Abdul Mateen Vs. Uoi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2012
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:06. 11.2012 W.P.(Crl) 1552/2010 ... Petitioner ABDUL MATEEN versus ... Respondents UOI AND ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr T.K. Mahapatra, Mr Dinesh, Mr Sunit Sharma : Mr Sachin Datta (CGSC) with Ms Kritika Mehra CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MS JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J.1. This writ petition seeks the quashing of notification S.O. No. 2941 (E) dated 18.11.2009 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Government of India on the ground that it is ultra vires the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the NDPS Act).2. The petitioner is a citizen of Afganistan and is facing trial in the case entitled State v. Niyamatulah & Ors. which arises out of FIR No. 212/2009 of Police Station Crime Branch registered under section 21(c) of the NDPS Act. An alleged recovery of 500 gram...
Daya Shankar Vs. Dheeraj Kumar and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2012
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:6. h November, 2012 + MAC. APP.1111/2011 DAYA SHANKAR Through ..... Appellant Mr.Rajnish K. Jha, Advocate versus DHEERAJ KUMAR & ORS Through ..... Respondents Ms. Suman Bagga, Advocate for the Respondent No.3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The only ground of challenge raised in the instant Appeal is that the Appellant was held to have contributed to the accident on the ground that at the time of his admission in the Hospital, he was found to be conscious, drowsy with the smell of alcohol and thus the Doctor opined that the Appellant was under the influence of alcohol.2. Admittedly, no test to measure the quantity of alcohol in the Appellants blood was done by the Doctor at the time of his admission. This accident took place at 11:30 pm. The Appellant reached the Casualty of Sanjay Gandhi Memorial Hospital at 12:20 am. He must have been examined thereafter. A perusal of the MLC plac...
Sukhdarshan Jindal Vs. the Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd. and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:6. h November, 2012 + CM(M) 835/2012 SUKHDARSHAN JINDAL Through: ..... Petitioner Mr.H.G.R.Khattar, Advocates versus THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.R.B.Shami, Advocate for R-1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT CM(M) 835/2012 1. The Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 02.06.2012 passed by the by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby his Application dated 25.04.2012 for release of amount of ` 1,00,000/- in the name of the Petitioner, that is, the owner of the Bus not DL-1P-PB3927, was rejected.2. A Division Bench of this Court in Court on Its Own Motion v. State & Ors., 2009 (107) DRJ 60.(DB) passed certain directions for protection of the victim of the motor vehicle accident. It was inter-alia directed that while ordering release of the Bus involved in the accident the owner/DTC would be asked to deposit a sum of ` 1,00,000/- as a minimum succor ...
Mohd. Azim Vs. Delhi Development Authority and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:6. h November, 2012 + CM(M) 1203/2012 MOHD. AZIM ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Syed Hasan Isfahani & Ms.Vasundha Baja, Advocates versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Rahul Bhandari, Advocate for R-1 DDA Mr.Javed Ahmed, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT C.M. APPL No.18850/2012(Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CM(M) 1203/2012 & CM. APPL No.18849/2012(Stay) 1. Mr.Rahul Bhandari, Advocate appears on behalf of Respondent No.1 DDA on advance copy being served upon him.2. Issue notice.3. Mr.Rahul Bhandari, Advocate appearing on behalf of Respondent No.1 accepts notice.4. Mr.Javed Ahmed, Advocate appearing on behalf of Respondent No.2 accepts notice.5. A suit for permanent injunction etc. was filed by the Petitioner with the contention that the Petitioner is in possession of a portion of the Khasra No.1151/3 (...
Shantanu Basu Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:06. 11.2012 W.P.(C) 6975/2012 SHANTANU BASU versus ..... Petitioner UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr A.K.Thakur and Mr R.K.Mishra. For the Respondents : Mr Rahul Kumar for Mr Gaurang Kanth for CAG. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) CM 18105/2012 The exemption is allowed subject to just exceptions. This application stands disposed of. WP(C) 6975/2012 1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 05.09.2012 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in OA No.1682/2012 whereby the petitioners said OA against the transfer order transferring him from Delhi to Guwahati has been disposed of in the following matter:4. In view of aforementioned facts and circumstances, while it is held that there is no legal infirmity in the impugned order...
Govt of Nct of Delhi Vs. M/S Kabil Pawan and Associates (Jv
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2012
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. 590/2010 % Judgment dated 06.11.2012 GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ...Petitioner Through : Mr.H.S. Sachdeva and Mr.Mithilesh Kr., Advs. VERSUS M/S KABIL PAWAN & ASSOCIATES (JV) ...Respondent Through : Mr.Jay Savla and Mr.Rajpal Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Petitioner has filed the present objections under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to the Award dated 15.5.2010 rendered by the sole Arbitrator, whereby out of the four claims raised by the respondent three claims were allowed. Award only with respect to claim no.3 has been challenged whereby the Arbitrator has awarded a sum of Rs.45.00 lakhs in favour of respondent.2. The necessary facts, to be noticed for disposal of the present objections are that the respondent herein was awarded a contract for the construction of a Prison Complex including housing at Mandoli Delhi. The petitioner (respondent before the Arbitrator) wa...
The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd. Vs. Smt. Krishna and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:6. h November, 2012 + MAC APP. 513/2012 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. Through: ..... Appellant. Mr.A.K.Soni, Advocates versus SMT. KRISHNA & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr.Uday Raj Singh, Advocate for R-1 to R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appeal is for reduction of compensation of ` 9,54,500/- awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) in favour of Respondents No.1 to 3 for the death of Kajod Singh, who died on 26.09.2007 in a motor vehicle accident, which occurred on 05/06.04.2005.2. The finding on negligence is not challenged by the Appellant Insurance Company. Thus, the same has attained finality.3. During inquiry before the Claims Tribunal, it was claimed that deceased Kajod Singh was working as a driver with Dr.K.C. Narang, C-304 Sheikh Sarai, New Delhi and was getting a salary of ` 4,800/- per month. The deceased Kajod Singh before succumbing...
Shamshad Vs. Delhi Development Authority and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-06-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:6. h November, 2012 + CM(M) 1205/2012 SHAMSHAD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Syed Hasan Isfahani & Ms.Vasundha Baja, Advocates versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Rahul Bhandari, Advocate for R-1 DDA Mr.Javed Ahmed, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT C.M. APPL No.18856/2012(Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CM(M) 1205/2012 & CM. APPL No.18855/2012(Stay) 1. Mr.Rahul Bhandari, Advocate appears on behalf of Respondent No.1 DDA on advance copy being served upon him.2. Issue notice.3. Mr.Rahul Bhandari, Advocate appearing on behalf of Respondent No.1 accepts notice.4. Mr.Javed Ahmed, Advocate appearing on behalf of Respondent No.2 accepts notice.5. A suit for permanent injunction etc. was filed by the Petitioner with the contention that the Petitioner is in possession of a portion of the Khasra No.1151/3 (Ol...
- ‹ Prev
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- Next ›
- Last »