Delhi Court November 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Khandelwal Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :1. t November, 2012 Pronounced on :8. h November, 2012 % + CRL.M.C. 2367/2011 KHANDELWAL BUILDERS PVT LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Mohit Mathur, Mr.Abhilash Mathur, Mr.Shishir Mathur, Mr. Atul Guleria, Mr.Devendra Dedha, Mr.Tanshif Akhtar, Advocates versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mrs. Rajdipa Behura, APP for State. Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate Instructed by Mr. Ajay Digpaul & Ms. Arti Bansal, Advocates for accused Narender Kumar Mago. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI % JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI 1 By this petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner has laid a challenge to the order dated 24.05.2011 in CC No.154/10 whereby the prayer of the petitioner to direct the police, in exercise of power under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C., to register FIR and investigate the matter, was declined by learned ACMM, Saket.2. In brief the case of the petitioner is that in April, 2007 one Narender Kumar Mago approached th...
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Youth Consruction Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :3. d August, 2012. Date of Decision :8. h November, 2012. % + ITA No.497/2010 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX .... Appellant Through: Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr.Standing Counsel with Mr.Puneet Gupta, Advocate VERSUS YOUTH CONSRUCTION PVT. LTD. Through: Mr.Somnath Shukla, Advocate ..Respondent CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR R.V. EASWAR, J.: This is an appeal filed by the Revenue and it pertains to the assessment year 2000-01. It is directed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 17th April, 2009 in ITA No.398/Del/2006.2. The Revenue has proposed the following questions as substantial questions of law arising under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961( Act, for short). 2.1 2.2.3. Whether learned ITAT erred in deleting the addition of Rs.1.65 crores made under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961? Whether the decision of the Honble Supreme Court in a case reported at 216 CTR 19.(SC) in...
ircon International Ltd. Vs. Budhiraja Mining and Construction Ltd. an ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI R-21 (Not reportable) + O.M.P. 431 of 2003 IRCON INTERNATIONAL LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. K.R. Gupta with Ms. Payal, Advocates. Versus BUDHRAJA MINING AND CONSTRUCITON LTD. & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Anil Seth with Mr. M.K. Pathak, Advocates. and R-22 + O.M.P. 432 of 2003 IRCON INTERNATIONAL LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. K.R. Gupta with Ms. Payal, Advocates. Versus BUDHRAJA MINING AND CONSTRUCITON LTD. & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Anil Seth with Mr. M.K. Pathak, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR % ORDER 08 11.2012 1. OMP No. 431 of 2003 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) filed by Ircon International Limited (IRCON) challenges an Additional Award dated 11th August 2003 passed by the learned Arbitrator in the application under Section 33 of the Act in the dispute between IRCON and Budhraja Mining and Constructions Limited (BMCL) arising out of the execution of the earthwork for r...
Star India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Onmobile Global Ltd. and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) No.2722/2012& Conn. 8th November, 2012 % 1. CS(OS) 2722/2012 STAR INDIA PVT. LTD. Through: ...Petitioner Mr. Gopal Subramaniam, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Saikrishna Rajagopal, Mr. Sidharth Chopra and Mr. Yakshay, Advocates. VERSUS PIYUSH AGARWAL & ORS. Through:2. ...... Defendants Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Gayatri Roy, Mr. Himanshu Bagai and Mr. Udit Sood, Advocates for D-1 and D-2. Abhinav Vasisht, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Radha Rangaswamy, Mr. Amit Sibal, Mr. Raman Kumar, Advocates for D-3. CS(OS) 3232/2012 STAR INDIA PVT. LTD. Through: ...Petitioner Mr. Gopal Subramaniam, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Saikrishna Rajagopal, Mr. Sidharth Chopra and Mr. Yakshay, Advocates. VERSUS IDEA CELLULAR LTD.& ANR. CS(OS) No.2722/2012 & conn. matters Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Sonali Jaitley, Ms. Subha Chauhan and Ms. Parul Yadav, Advocates for D-1. Mr. Mukul Rohtag...
The Commissioner of Income Tax New Delhi Vs. Jaggon International Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2012
$~1 & 2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8. h November, 2012 + ITA 1395/2010 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX NEW DELHI versus JAGGON INTERNATIONAL LTD + ..... Appellant ..... Respondent ITA 1289/2011 CIT ..... Appellant versus JAGSON INTERNATIONAL LTD Presence : ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, sr. Standing counsel with Mr. Puneet Gupta, jr. Standing counsel for the appellant Mr. C S Aggarwal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajeev Saxena, Mr. Pravesh Kumar and Ms. Pushpa Sharma, Advs. for the respondent. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J: (OPEN COURT) The substantial question of law arising for consideration is Whether on the true and correct interpretation of section 115VD of the Act could it be held that Deep Sea Matdrill is a ship for the purposes of chapter XX-G of I.T. Act? 2. The relevant facts are that the assessee sought to opt for tonnage tax scheme under Chapter XII-G especially Section 115VP/115VR of the Income ...
National Highways Authority of India Vs. Cec ??? Hcc (Jv)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2012
R-4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % Date of Decision:08. 11.2012 FAO (OS) No. 381/2012 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Arun Kumar Varma, Ms. Mansi Wadhera and Mr. Ashish Bansal, Advocates versus CEC HCC (JV) Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Pravin H Parekh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sameer Parekh, Mr. D.P. Mohanty, Mr. Vishal Prasad, Ms.Ritika Sethi and Ms. Suman Yadav, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. A contract was awarded by the appellant National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) to the respondent contractor for the work of rehabilitation and upgradation of NH 7.from KM 25.to KM 31.in Rajasthan Contract Package RJ -7, vide agreement dated 19.09.2005. During the course of execution of the project, the following two disputes arose between the parties: Dispute No. 1 Payment for construction of Embankment with fly ash in accordance with BoQ item No. 2.02 (b) read with...
Indian Herbs Reserach and Supply Col. Ltd.and ors. Vs. --------------- ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2012
22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:08.11.2012 CO.APPL.(M) 157/2012 IN THE MATTER OF INDIAN HERBS RESEARCH & SUPPLY CO LTD .... Applicant Transferor Company No.1 AND EVIN FOODS & INDUSTRIES P.LTD. .... Applicant Transferor Company No.2 AND EVIN BIOCEUTICALS PVT. LTD .... Applicant Transferor Company No.3 WITH INDIA HERBS SPECIALITIES P.LTD. Through .... Applicant Transferee Company Mr. Abhishek Seth, Mr. Rajiv Kumar and Mr. Rahul Raj, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1. This is a first motion application under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 filled by Indian Herbs Research & Supply Co. Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferor Company1) and Envin Foods & Industries Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferor Company2) and Envin Bioceuticals Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferor Company3) and Indian Herbs Specialities Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferee...
Rani Mashi and ors. Vs. Lokender and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:2. d November, 2012 + MAC APP.886/2011 RANI MASHI & ORS. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Anuj Saini Proxy Counsel for Mr. D.K. Sharma, Adv. Versus LOKENDER & ORS. Through: .....Respondents Ms. Suman Bagga, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. Learned Counsel for the Respondent No.3 Insurance Company states that there is no breach of the terms and conditions of the policy. In this view of matter, service of Respondents No.1 and 2 is dispensed with.2. With the consent of the parties, the Appeal is taken up for final disposal.3. The Appeal is for enhancement of compensation of `5,99,120/- awarded in favour of the Appellants for the death of Pooran Mashi who died in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 04.04.2010.4. In the absence of any Appeal by the driver, owner of the Insurance Company, the finding on negligence reached by the Claims Tribunal has attained finality.5. During ...
Danish and anr. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPL. No.1454/2011 Date of Decision :08. 11.2011 DANISH & ANR. Petitioners Through: Mr. F.Haq, Adv. Versus STATE Respondent Through: Mr.Sunil Sharma, APP CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI 1 2.3. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment To be referred to the Reporter or not Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest V.K. SHALI, J.(oral) 1. This is a petition for grant of anticipatory bail by the brother in law and the father in law of the deceased for an offence under Section 304B/498-A IPC registered vide FIR no.336/2011 by P.S. Jamia Nagar.2. The main contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that a reading of the complaint lodged by one Gulzar Ahmed, father of the deceased does not show that there was any immediate demand of dowry prior to the date of the death, by either of the petitioners. Therefore, prima facie the ingredients of Section 304B IPC are not satisfied. It was con...
Star India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Idea Cellular Ltd.and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-08-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) No.2722/2012& Conn. 8th November, 2012 % 1. CS(OS) 2722/2012 STAR INDIA PVT. LTD. Through: ...Petitioner Mr. Gopal Subramaniam, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Saikrishna Rajagopal, Mr. Sidharth Chopra and Mr. Yakshay, Advocates. VERSUS PIYUSH AGARWAL & ORS. Through:2. ...... Defendants Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Gayatri Roy, Mr. Himanshu Bagai and Mr. Udit Sood, Advocates for D-1 and D-2. Abhinav Vasisht, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Radha Rangaswamy, Mr. Amit Sibal, Mr. Raman Kumar, Advocates for D-3. CS(OS) 3232/2012 STAR INDIA PVT. LTD. Through: ...Petitioner Mr. Gopal Subramaniam, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Saikrishna Rajagopal, Mr. Sidharth Chopra and Mr. Yakshay, Advocates. VERSUS IDEA CELLULAR LTD.& ANR. CS(OS) No.2722/2012 & conn. matters Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Sonali Jaitley, Ms. Subha Chauhan and Ms. Parul Yadav, Advocates for D-1. Mr. Mukul Rohtag...
- ‹ Prev
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Next ›
- Last »