Delhi Court November 2012 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Nov 09 2012

Union of India Vs. Dhanwantri Ayurvedic Medical College and Hospital a ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-09-2012

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h November, 2012 % + LPA No.719/2012 UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna & Mr. Ashish Virmani, Advs. Versus DHANWANTRI AYURVEDIC MEDICAL COLLEGE & HOSPITAL & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. S.P. Sinha, Adv. for R-1&2. Mr. T.K. Joseph, Adv. for R-3. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.This intra-court appeal impugns the judgment dated 9th October, 2012 of the learned Single Judge of this Court allowing W.P.(C) No.5506/2012 preferred by the respondents no.1&2 by quashing the order dated 27 th August, 2012 of the appellant refusing permission to the respondent no.1 College to admit students to the Bachelor of Ayurvedic Medical Sciences (BAMS) Course for the Academic Year 2012-13 and directing the appellant to grant such permission to the respondent no.1 College.2. The counsels for the respondents i.e. for the respon...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 2012

M.S Sms-vishwa(Jv) Vs. Icici Bank Ltd and Others

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-09-2012

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:07. 11.2012 Judgment pronounced on:09. 11.2012 IA 19947/2012 in CS(OS) 3190/2012 M.S SMS-VISHWA(JV) Through : ..... Plaintiff Mr. Rajiv Nayyar, Sr. Adv. with Mr.S.D.Singh, Mr. Amarpreet Singh, Mr. Rahul and Ms. Kamla, Advs. versus ICICI BANK LTD & OTHERS Through : ..... Defendants None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.1. Defendant No.4 Thane Municipal Corporation awarded the work of providing laying and commissioning of gravity sewers alongwith construction of manholes for sewerage network and design, construction, supply, erection, testing etc. of sewerage pumping stations to the plaintiff company and an agreement dated 27.2.2009 in this regard was executed between them. In terms of Clause 10 of the notice inviting tender, the plaintiff furnished Bank Guarantee to the tune of 2% of the contract value and 3% of the security deposit was to be deducted from the R.A. Bills. The security deposit was to be ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 2012

JatIn Singh Vs. Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-09-2012

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.4194 of 2011 & W.P.(C) No.801 of 2012 Reserved on:10. h October, 2012. Pronounced on:09. November, 2012. % + W.P.(C) No.4194/2011 JATIN SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashok Agarwal along with Mr. Khagesh B. Jha and Ms. Nisha Tomar, Advocates. versus KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. S. Rajappa along with Mr. H. Jayaraman and Dr. Puran Chand, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG along with Mr. Neeraj Chaudhari, CGSC, Mr. Ravjyot Singh, Advocate for UOI. W.P.(C) No.801/2012 SOCIAL JURIST, A CIVIL RIGHTS GROUP Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Ashok Agarwal along with Mr. Khagesh B. Jha and Ms. Nisha Tomar, Advocates. versus KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN Through: W.P.(C) No.4194 of 2011 & W.P.(C) No.801 of 2012 ..... Respondent Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG along with Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, CGSC and Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advs. for UOI. Mr. S. Rajappa along with Mr. H. Jayaraman and Dr. Puran Chand, Mr. V.C. Jha al...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 2012

Delhi Public School and anr. Vs. Shalu Mahendroo and ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-09-2012

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h November, 2012 % + LPA No.737/2012 DELHI PUBLIC SCHOOL & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Rakesh Tikku, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Puneet Mittal, Mr. Ankur Aggarwal & Mr. Nitin Sharma, Advs. Versus SHALU MAHENDROO & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. V. Shekhar, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Shaveta Chaudhary, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv. for R-2. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.This intra-court appeal impugns the order dated 30.10.2012 of the learned Single Judge to the extent it, while issuing notice of W.P.(C) No.6646/2012 preferred by the respondent No.1, staying till the next date of hearing i.e. 19.12.2012, the order of the Disciplinary Authority of the appellant School of placing the respondent under suspension.2. The respondent No.1 impugned the order of suspension inter alia on the ground that the same had been made without obtaining the prior permission in wri...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 2012

M/S Karam Chand Thapar and Bros (Coal Sales) Ltd Vs. Tehri Hydro Devel ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-09-2012

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 322/2010 M/S KARAM CHAND THAPAR & BROS (COAL SALES) LTD Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. A.K. Ganguly, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sukumar Pattjoshi, Ms. Madhumita Kothari, Ms. Reetu Chhabra and Mr. Niranjan Behera, Advocates. versus TEHRI HYDRO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INDIA LTD & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Gourab Banerjee, Sr. Advocate with Mr. S.K. Taneja, Sr. Adv. alongwith Mr. Puneet Taneja and Mr. Anand Kumar Singh, Advocates for the respondent No.1. Mr. Jaswinder Singh, Advocate for the respondent No.2. % Date of Decision : November 09, 2012 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL JUDGMENT : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.1. The present petition under Section 11(2) and (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed by M/s. Karam Chand Thapar & Bros (Coal Sales) Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as KCT). BRIEF BACKGROUND 2 The essential facts leading to the dispute between the parties are within a narrow compass. The Respondent,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 2012

Union of India and ors. Vs. Col. V.K. Shad

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-09-2012

* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:30. 08.2012 Judgment Delivered on:09. 11.2012 % + WP(C) 499/2012 & CM 1059/2012 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ...... Petitioners Vs COL. V.K. SHAD ..... Respondent AND + WP(C) 1138/2012 & CM 2462/2012 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ...... Petitioners Vs COL. P.P. SINGH ..... Respondent AND + WP(C) 1144/2012 & CM 2486/2012 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ...... Petitioners Vs BRIG. S. SABHARWAL ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners: Mr Rajeeve Mehra, Additional Solicitor General with Mr Ankur Chibber, Ms Aakriti Jain & Mr Ashish Virmani, Advocates. For the Respondents: Col. V.K. Shad, Respondent in person in WP(C) No. 499/2012. CORAM :HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J 1.The captioned writ petitions raises a common question of law, which is, whether the petitioners are obliged to furnish information to respondent which is retained with them in the record, in the form of file notings as also the opinion...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 2012

Anil Kumar Vs. Puran and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-09-2012

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:9. h November, 2012 + MAC. APP. 476/2005 ANIL KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr.S.N.Parashar, Advocate Through: ..... Respondents Mr.Manoj R.Sinha, Advocate for R-2 versus PURAN & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appeal is for enhancement of compensation of ` 93,900/awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) in favour of the Appellant for having suffered injuries in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 09.12.2001.2. In the absence of any Appeal by the driver, owner or the Insurer, the finding on negligence has attained finality.3. The Claims Tribunal awarded the compensation of ` 93,900/- which is tabulated hereunder: Sl. Compensation under various heads No.1. MAC APP 476/2005 Pain & Suffering Awarded by the Claims Tribunal 2. Medicines, Medical Treatment, Special Diet & Conveyance Charges ` 17,500/- 3. Permanent disability ` 40,800/- 4. Loss of Inco...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 2012

The Himalaya Drug Company Vs. M/S. S.B.L. Limited

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Nov-09-2012

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: October 11, 2012 Judgment Pronounced on: November 9, 2012 % + RFA (OS) No.90/2010 THE HIMALAYA DRUG COMPANY ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Hemant Singh, Advocate with Ms.Mamta Jha, Mr.Sachin Gupta and Ms.Shashi P.Ojha and Mr.Siddhant Asthana, Advocates versus M/S. S.B.L. LIMITED Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.V.P.Singh, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Atish Dipankar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The above mentioned appeal has been filed by the appellant (hereinafter referred to as plaintiff) against the judgment and decree dated 3rd June, 2010 passed by the learned Single Judge in CS(OS) No. 111/2006 (old Suit No.1305/1996) whereby the suit against the respondent (hereinafter referred to as defendant) for infringement of trade mark Liv.52 by use of trade mark LIV-T by the defendant was dismissed and it was held that there is no case made...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 2012