Delhi Court November 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kamal Mohini Passi Vs. Raj Kumar Khosla Thru??? Lr and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2012
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: November 19, 2012 + RFA(OS) 110/2012 KAMAL MOHINI PASSI ..... Appellant Represented by: Mrs.Santosh Singh, Advocate and Mr.Rakesh K.Mudgal, Advocates. versus RAJ KUMAR KHOSLA THRU LR & ORS. Represented by: Nemo. ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) CM No.19230/2012 Allowed; subject to all just exceptions. RFA(OS) 110/2012 1. Raj Kumar Khosla instituted a suit impleading his three brothers as defendants and sought partition of various properties alleging that he and his three brothers had equal share therein. The subject properties were stated to be owned by the parents of the parties. As per the plaint, claim was predicated on wills executed by the parents, in which wills no share was bequeathed to their daughter i.e. the appellant.2. In the written statement filed by the three other brothers they did not deny that each brother had 1/...
Vinod @ Dantla Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 460/2012 Reserved on:16. h OCTOBER, 2012 Date of Decision:19. h NOVEMBER, 2012 % VINOD @ DANTLA ..... Appellant Through Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Farooq Chaudhary & Mr. Vishal Raj Sehijpal, Advocates. Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP for the State. DEATH SENTENCE REFERENCE NO. 1/2012 STATE ..... Appellant Through Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP for the State. Versus VINOD @ DANTLA ..... Respondent Through Mr. R.M. Tufail, Mr. Farooq Chaudhary & Mr. Vishal Raj Sehijpal, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG SANJIV KHANNA, J: CRL.M.A. NO. 4974/2012 The present order will dispose of the application under Section 7A of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (Act, for short) read with Rule 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Rules, 2009 (Rules, for short). The application has been filed by Vinod @ Dantla, who has been convi...
Santosh Malhotra Vs. Ved Prakash Malhotra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Crl. M.A. NO.3068/2012 IN Crl. M.C. NO. 2386/2010 Date of Decision:19. h November, 2012 + # ! SANTOSH MALHOTRA ....Petitioner Through: In person Versus $ * VED PRAKASH MALHOTRA ...Respondent Through: Ms. Aarti Mahajan, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER P.K.BHASIN, J: This application under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed in a disposed of matter by the applicant-wife who has been dragging her husband and two sons into different legal battles for claiming maintenance from them and against whom this Court had recently on 18th May, 2012 while dismissing one of her petitions(being Crl. M. C. No.3948/2008) filed by her against her husband observed as under:8. ................the petitioner seems to be trying to abuse the benevolent provisions of Section 125 Cr.P.C. This Section is designed to help the need and not the greedy. It is not meant for settling the personal scores, but it is experienced that it ...
Bharti Goel and ors. Vs. Mohd. Nadeem Khan and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2012
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. h November, 2012 + MAC. APP. 645/2011 BHARTI GOEL & ORS. Through ..... Appellants Mr. N.K. Jha, Advocate versus MOHD. NADEEM KHAN & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Ms. Shivali Bansal for the Respondent No.3 Insurance Company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The present Appeal is allowed in terms of the judgment passed today in MAC.APP.548/2011 titled NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. v. BHARTI GOEL & ORS.2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE NOVEMBER 19 2012 pst...
Cit Vs. Becton Dickinson India Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2012
$~23 to 27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. 11.2012 + + + + + ITA 39/2012 ITA 40/2012 ITA 41/2012 ITA 42/2012 ITA 43/2012 CIT ..... Appellant Through Mr. Rohit Madan, Adv. versus BECTON DICKINSON INDIA PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr. Piyush Singh and Ms. Ayushi Pareek, Advs. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR S. RAVINDRA BHAT,J: (OPEN COURT) The revenue claims to be aggrieved by the common order dated 12.11.2010 of the Tribunal in several appeal filed by the revenue for various assessment years 2001-02, 2002-03, 2004-05 and 2005-06.2. The assessees appeals for assessment years 2004-05 and 2002-03 were also considered by the ITAT by the said common order.3. The revenue urges following substantial question of law before this Court i.e. whether the Tribunal fell into error in treating the provision for warranty as provision for diminution in the value of assets and thus to be added to the book profit under Explanation 1(i) to Sec...
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Bharti Goel and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2012
$~ 7, 8, 9 & 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. h November, 2012 + MAC. APP. 548/2011 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through Ms. Shivali Bansal, Advocate versus BHARTI GOEL & ORS. Through + ..... Respondents Mr. N.K. Jha, Advocate for the Respondents No.1 to 4. MAC. APP. 549/2011 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through Ms. Shivali Bansal, Advocate versus BHARTI GOEL & ORS. Through + ..... Respondents Mr. N.K. Jha, Advocate for the Respondent No.1. MAC. APP. 557/2011 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through Ms. Shivali Bansal, Advocate versus BABY PRIYANGANA GOEL & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. N.K. Jha, Advocate for the Respondent No.1. + MAC. APP. 645/2011 BHARTI GOEL & ORS. Through ..... Appellants Mr. N.K. Jha, Advocate versus MOHD. NADEEM KHAN & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Ms. Shivali Bansal for the Respondent No.3 Insurance Company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1....
Cit Vs. Becton Dickinson India Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2012
$~23 to 27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. 11.2012 + + + + + ITA 39/2012 ITA 40/2012 ITA 41/2012 ITA 42/2012 ITA 43/2012 CIT ..... Appellant Through Mr. Rohit Madan, Adv. versus BECTON DICKINSON INDIA PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr. Piyush Singh and Ms. Ayushi Pareek, Advs. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR S. RAVINDRA BHAT,J: (OPEN COURT) The revenue claims to be aggrieved by the common order dated 12.11.2010 of the Tribunal in several appeal filed by the revenue for various assessment years 2001-02, 2002-03, 2004-05 and 2005-06.2. The assessees appeals for assessment years 2004-05 and 2002-03 were also considered by the ITAT by the said common order.3. The revenue urges following substantial question of law before this Court i.e. whether the Tribunal fell into error in treating the provision for warranty as provision for diminution in the value of assets and thus to be added to the book profit under Explanation 1(i) to Sec...
Union of India and ors Vs. Pravesh Mehra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:19. 11.2012 W.P.(C) 7688/2011 UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Petitioners versus PRAVESH MEHRA ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr S.K. Dubey with Mr Ruchir Mishra and Ms Bhagyashree Pati For the Respondent : Mr Maninder Singh, Sr Advocate with Mr Vivek Pandey, Mr Ashok Kashyap and Mr Siddharth Khatana CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 24.09.2010 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A. No.1870/2009. The said original application which was filed by the respondent herein was allowed by the Tribunal.2. The issue raised in the said O.A. was as to from which date the Dynamic Assured Career Progression (DACP) Scheme as recommended by the 5th Central Pay Commission was to apply with regard to dental surgeons wor...
SachIn Varshney and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:19. 11.2012 W.P.(C) 7207/2012, CM 18571/2012 & CM 18572/2012 SACHIN VARSHNEY & ANR. ..... Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr S.D.Singh and Ms Bharti Tyagi. For the Respondents : Mr Sachin Datta with Ms Ritika Jhurani. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. The learned counsel for the petitioners states that there is a mistake in the papers filed in the sense that the copy of the order dated 16.12.2009 in OA No.1551/2009 at pages 124 to 126 is not the complete order. We also notice that only the beginning portion of the order has been reproduced at pages 124 to 125 and then there is an extract of paragraph 10. Obviously, this is not the complete order. The learned counsel for the petitioners has handed over a copy of the complete order which is quite dim. Ho...
Naresh @ Kalu Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1490/2011 Reserved on:7. h August, 2012 Date of Decision:19. hNovember, 2012 % NARESH @ KALU ....Appellant Through Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Jitender Tyagi, Advocate. Versus THE STATE Respondent Through Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP for the State. CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 218/2012 ASHOK @ RAMU ....Appellant Through Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate. Versus STATE OF THE NCT OF DELHI Respondent Through Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP for the State. CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 385/2012 BALRAJ ....Appellant Through Mr. S.K. Tiwary, Advocate. Versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI Respondent Through Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP for the State. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P. GARG SANJIV KHANNA, J.: Naresh @ Kalu, Ashok and Balraj by the impugned judgment dated 20th July, 2011 have been convicted under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, for short) for murder of Dushyant Sharma. By the order of sent...
- ‹ Prev
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- Next ›
- Last »