Delhi Court November 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gopal Goyal Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2012
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :19. h November, 2012 % + BAIL APPLN. 1565/2012 GOPAL GOYAL Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.Mukul Rohatgi and Mr.Ramesh Gupta, Senior Advocates instructed by Mr.Rajiv Sirohi, Mr.Kapil Sankhla, Ms.Meghna Sankhla, Ms.Diksha and Mr.Bharat Sharma, Advs. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Sidharth Luthra, Addl. Solicitor General & Mr.Rajesh Mahajan, Addl. Standing Counsel for State with Mr.Pramod Kumar Dubey, Mr.Yashpreet Singh, Mr.Shiv Pandey, Mr.Amit Singh Rathod, Mr.Rohit Gupta, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.(Oral) % 1. This is an application moved under Section 439 CrPC read with Section 482 CrPC by the petitioner Gopal Goyal praying for bail in case FIR No.178/2012 under Sections 306/506/201/120-B/466/467/468/469/ 471 read with Section 34 IPC and under Section 66-A of I.T. Act, PS Bharat Nagar, Delhi.2. Reply to the bail application has been filed by the State.3. ...
Anand Singh Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2012
$~R-1C * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: November 19, 2012 + W.P.(C) 1425/1999 ANAND SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.H.S.Dahiya, Advocate. versus UOI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms.Archana Gaur, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HONBLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. With reference to the record of the inquiry produced in Court today and on perusing the same and in the context of the signatures of the petitioner to be found on the charge-memo as also the Articles of Charge, statement of imputation, list of relied upon documents and list of witnesses and the order passed at the preliminary hearing where the petitioner made limited grievance of document at serial No.2 of the list of documents supplied to him being illegible and keeping in view the standard of proof required at a domestic inquiry, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the pet...
Vinod Sharma Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2012
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. h November, 2012 % + LPA No.753/2012 VINOD SHARMA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. R.K. Saini with Mr. Vikram Saini, Advs. Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Birbal, Adv. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.This intra court appeal impugns the judgment dated 15 th March, 2012 of the learned Single Judge dismissing WP(C) No.2076/2010 preferred by the appellant. Though the appeal is accompanied with applications for condonation of 5 days delay in filing and 143 days delay in refiling the appeal and there does not appear to be any plausible explanation for such delays but we have nevertheless heard the counsel for the appellant on merits also.2. The appellant was the highest bidder in the auction held by the respondent DDA on 22nd June, 2006 of Commercial Shop bearing Unit F-2, CSC No.2, Preet Vihar, G Block, Delhi. He had made an earnest mo...
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Bharti Goel and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2012
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. h November, 2012 + MAC. APP. 549/2011 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through Ms. Shivali Bansal, Advocate versus BHARTI GOEL & ORS. Through ..... Respondents Mr. N.K. Jha, Advocate for the Respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The present Appeal is dismissed in terms of the judgment passed today in MAC.APP.548/2011 titled NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. v. BHARTI GOEL & ORS.2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE NOVEMBER 19 2012 pst...
Emco Limited Vs. Malvika Steel Limited and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % CS(OS) No. 258/2000 19th November, 2012 EMCO LIMITED Through: ......Plaintiff Mr. Jay Savla and Ms. Amrita Mishra and Mr. Rajpal Singh, Advocates. VERSUS MALVIKA STEEL LIMITED & ORS ...... Defendants Through: Mr. P.S.Bindra and Mr. Khetan, Advocates for D-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This suit filed by the plaintiff M/s EMCO Ltd. essentially seeks two reliefs, one of recovery of ` 1,10,91,347/- alongwith interest against the defendant no.1 on account of latters breach of contract in failing to lift the manufactured transformers which were especially made for the defendant no.1, and second of injunction to restrain the defendant no.3 from making payment under the bank guarantee dated 24.4.1998 on the ground that the demand made by the defendant no.2/beneficiary for payment under the bank guarantee is defective i.e not in accordance with the terms of bank ...
Neelam Dwivedi and anr Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2012
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:19. 11.2012 + W.P.(C) 3186/2012 NEELAM DWIVEDI & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Ms.Anisha Jain and Ms.Divya Garg, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Ankur Chhibber and Ms.Aakri Jain, Advocates for Respondent No.1. Mr. B.P. Aggarwal and Mr.Anil Meena, Advocates for Respondents No. 2 and 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) W.P.(C) 3186/2012 1. With the consent of the parties, the instant petition is taken up for disposal.2. Vide the instant petition, the petitioners are seeking issuance of direction to the respondents to quash the order of termination of services dated 23.04.2012 against them and seeking their re-instatement with full service benefits till the appointment of regular candidates as well.3. The petitioners are also seeking direction against the respondents to pay entire back wages from the date of termination of services until the date of re-in...
Kuldeep Singh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2012
$~R-15. *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 496/2009 Date of decision:19. h November, 2012 KULDEEP SINGH ..... Appellant Through Mr. K.B. Andley, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Mohd. Shamikh, Advocate. Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): The appellant-Kuldeep Singh, by the impugned judgment dated 26th March, 2009, stands convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, for short) for murder of his wife-Nidhi. In addition, the appellant has also been convicted, under Section 364 IPC, for abduction of the deceased. By the order of sentence, dated 31st March, 2009, under Section 302 IPC, he has been sentenced to life imprisonment and fine of Rs.50,000/-. In default of payment of fine, he is to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year. For the offence under Section 364 IPC, the appellant has been sentenced to rigor...
Subhash Vs. State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl. A. 1090/2011 Reserved on:4. h October, 2012 Date of Decision:19. h November, 2012 % Subhash ....Appellant Through Mr. G.B. Sewak, Advocate. Versus State of NCT of Delhi Through Respondent Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P. GARG SANJIV KHANNA, J.The appellant Subhash stands convicted, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), for having committed murder of his wife Shashi Sharma, in Sessions Case No. 80/2010, arising out of FIR No. 561/2005, Police Station Sultan Puri. He has been sentenced to life imprisonment and fine of Rs.10,000/-. In default of payment of fine, he has to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months.2. It is undisputed that Shashi Sharma, wife of the appellant, was admitted to Safdarjung Hospital with burn injuries, on 9th April, 2005. Her MLC (Ex. PW14/A), recorded on 9th April, 2005, at 03.10 A.M, mentions that she was brought to the hospital by her ...
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd Vs. Kavita and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2012
$~ 28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:19. h November, 2012 + MAC. APP. 870/2010 RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate versus KAVITA & ORS. Through ..... Respondents Mr. J.S. Mann, Advocate for the Respondents No.1 to 5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appeal is directed against a judgment dated 06.10.2010 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(the Claims Tribunal) whereby a compensation of `15,77,000/- was awarded for the death of Rakesh who died in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 25.06.2010.2. A perusal of the Trial Court record reveals that a DAR(Detailed Accident Report) was filed by the Appellant Insurance Company whereby the Appellant made a legal offer of a sum of `8,75,000/- as full and final settlement. The offer was not considered to be reasonable and, therefore, was rejected by the Respondents(Claimants). The Claims Tribunal proceeded to det...
Uma Sharma and ors Vs. Iaf Educational and Cultural Society and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-19-2012
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:19. h November, 2012 % + W.P.(C) 6889/2012 & CM No.17911/2012 UMA SHARMA AND ORS Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. R.V. Sinha, Mr. R.N. Singh and Mr. A.S. Singh, Advocates. Versus IAF EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL SOCIETY AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra with Mr. Aashish Gupta, Advocates for R-3 & 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners were appointed by the respondent No.2 on various dates between 19.04.1993 to 27.11.2001 and were confirmed on various dates between 31.07.1998 to 22.05.2008.2. The petitioners are resident of Faridabad, Haryana and they were working with the respondent no.2 at Faridabad, Haryana and their services were terminated at Faridabad, Haryana. The said decision was communicated by the respondent no.2 to the petitioners at Faridabad, Haryana.3. The respondent No.2 initially issued termination-cum-show cause notice dated 28.12.2011 against wh...
- ‹ Prev
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- Next ›
- Last »