Delhi Court November 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Mehta Charitable Prajnalay Trust
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:6. h September, 2012 Date of Decision:20. h November, 2012 % + + + + + + + ITA 309/2003 ITA 417/2003 ITA 18/2004 ITA 722/2007 ITA 770/2011 ITA 1050/2011 ITA 1051/2011 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX .....Appellant Through: Mr. Abhishek Maratha, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms. Anshul Sharma, Advocate. Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Sr. Standing Counsel. Versus MEHTA CHARITABLE PRAJNALAY TRUST ......Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra with Ms. Kavita Jha and Mr. Somnath Shukla, Advocates. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR R.V. EASWAR, J.: These are seven appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short). The relevant assessment years are 199293 to 1994-95, 2001-02 and 2005-06 to 2007-08. In all the appeals except the appeal in ITA No.722/2007, the following substantial questions of law have been framed: (a) Whether the Tribunal was correct in law in confirming the order of CIT (A) and t...
Raju Etc. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :17. h October, 2012 Pronounced on :20th November, 2012 % + CRL.A. 41/2011 RAJU Through : .....Appellant Ms.Rakhi Dubey,Adv. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms.Rajdipa Behura, APP for State. NANEHEY @ VIJAY Through : .....Appellant Mr. S.K.Sethi, Adv. AND + CRL.A. 319/2011 versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Ms.Rajdipa Behura, APP for State. AND + CRL.A. 728/2011 RAM NIWAS Through : .....Appellant Mr. Anish Dhingra, Adv. versus STATE Through: Crl.A. Nos.41/2011, 319/2011 & 728/2011 ..... Respondent Ms.Rajdipa Behura, APP for CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI % PRATIBHA RANI, J.1. These three appeals bearing Crl.A. Nos.41/2011, 319/2011 and 728/2011 have been preferred by the appellants namely Raju, Nanehey and Ram Niwas respectively challenging the judgment dated 18.05.2009 vide which they were convicted for the offence punishable under Section 366 & 376(2)(g) IPC and also the order dated 25.05.2009 sentencing them ...
Dlf Ltd Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:15. 02.2012 PRONOUNCED ON:20. 11.2012 + LPA 100/2012 & CM Nos. 2380-2382/2012 DLF LTD ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Soli J.Sorabjee, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Ritu Bhalla, Mr. Dhruv Dewan, Ms. Ananya Ghosh, Mr. Anand Misra and Mr. Mehznaz Mehta, Advocates. versus SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Neeraj Malhotra, Ms. Mahima Gupta, Mr. Shaurijyo Mukherjee, Advocates for Resp-1/SEBI. Mr. Amit Sibal with Ms. Priyanka Kalra, Mr. Gaurav Mitra, Mr. Vinay Tripathi and Mr. A. Mitra, Advocates for Resp-2. Mr. Arvind Kr. Nigam, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Ranjana Roy Gawai, Mr. Krishna Keshav and Mr. Shailesh Suman, Advocate for Resp-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. P. GARG MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The present appellant (hereafter DLF) challenges an order of the learned Single Judge, dated 03.01.2012 dismissing W.P.(C) LPA 100/...
State Vs. NavIn Ahuja
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:08. 12.2011 PRONOUNCED ON:20. 11.2012 + DEATH SENTENCE NO. 04/2010 STATE ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC Versus NAVIN AHUJA + ..... Respondent Through: Mr. S.P. Mehta, Advocate CRL.A. 1435/2010 NAVIN AHUJA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.P. Mehta, Advocate versus NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI % 1. To comply with the mandate of Section 366, CrPC requiring confirmation of death sentence by High Court, the impugned judgment dated 22.09.2010 and the order on sentence dated 06.10.2010 awarding death penalty to the appellant for committing triple murder, was sent to this Court for confirmation. The Trial Court also convicted the Appellant/accused for committing the offences under Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, and imposed a sentence of 3 years rigorous imprisonment, each in respect o...
Cit Vs. Jrm Steel Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2012
$~1 & 2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. h November, 2012 + ITA 63.& 639/2012 CIT Through: ..... Appellant Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr.Standing Counsel with Mr.Puneet Gupta, and Ms.Gayatri Verma, Advocates. versus JRM STEEL PVT. LTD. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.S.Krishnan, Advocate CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR R.V. EASWAR,J: (OPEN COURT) CM Nos.19160 & 19161/2012 Applications are allowed subject to all just exceptions. ITA 63.& 639/2012 The appeals are by the Revenue and they arise out of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal for short) on 31.10.2011 in the cross appeals filed by the assessee and the Revenue. In these appeals we are concerned with the order of the Tribunal in ITA Nos.1879-1880/Del/2011, which are appeals filed by the Revenue before the Tribunal in relation to the assessment years 2000-01 and 200102. The order of the Tribunal which is impugned in these appeals was passed in the second ...
Zenith Ropes Pvt Ltd Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:20. 11.2012 + FAO(OS) 192/2012 ZENITH ROPES PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Suhail Dutt, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Saran Suri and Mr.Gunjan Kumar, Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr.R.V.Sinha, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.(Oral) 1. Admit.2. Learned counsel for the respondent accepts notice.3. At request of learned counsel for the parties, the appeal is taken up for final disposal.4. An open tender was floated by the Railway Board bearing no. CS110/1994 in which the appellant participated and was declared successful resulting in a letter of acceptance dated 03.02.1995 written by the appellant which finally culminated in a contract inter se the parties dated 09.02.1995 for supply of 5124 metric ton of high tensile wires. The total _____________________________________________________________________________________________ FAO ...
M/S Lall Constructions Co Vs. the General Manger Northern Railway
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 367/2011 M/S LALL CONSTRUCTIONS CO ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shankar Kumar Jha, Mr. Sumeet Batra and Ms. Ankita Gupta, Advocates. versus THE GENERAL MANGER NORTHERN RAILWAY Through: % ..... Respondent Mr. R.V. Sinha with Mr. R.N. Singh, Advocates. Date of Decision : November 20, 2012 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL JUDGMENT : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.1. The Petitioner M/s. Lall Constructions Co. has moved the present petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for the appointment of an impartial and neutral Arbitrator to arbitrate upon the disputes between the parties.2. The instant dispute arises out of a contract bearing No.74- W1/1/397/WA/UMB dated 01.08.2007 which was awarded to the Petitioner by the Respondent for Supplying and laying blanketing material 600 mm thick over top of formation from Km 0.00 to Km 16.250 in connec...
Cit Vs. Vodafone Essar South Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:09. 10.2012 PRONOUNCED ON:20. 11.2012 + ITA No.119/2012 CIT ..... Appellant Through : Ms. Rashmi Chopra, Sr. Standing counsel versus VODAFONE ESSAR SOUTH LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. N.Venkatraman, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Kavin Gulati, Mr. Raunak Dhillon, Mr. Varun Kumar and Mr. Aseem Mewar, Advocates CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The Revenue is aggrieved by an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 24.06.2011 in ITA 3238/Del/2009. The question of law sought to be urged by it is whether the impugned order is in error in setting aside the assessment made by the CIT, after invoking jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. ITA 119/2012 Pag2. Briefly, the facts are that the respondent assessee, in its return for assessment year 2004-05, declared loss of `.234,75,55,861/-; the assessed loss was ` 229,92,11,019/- under Section 143 (3) of the A...
Sandeep Vats Vs. Delhi Transco Ltd and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2012
$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:20. 11.2012 + W.P.(C) 7244/2012 SANDEEP VATS Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. M.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate. Versus DELHI TRANSCO LTD AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Avnish Ahlawat with Ms. Latika Choudhary, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(ORAL) CM No.18671/2012 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 7244/2012 1. Vide this instant petition the petitioner seeks to quash and set aside the impugned Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) order / advice dated 01.10.2012 being illegal and arbitrary and further seeks to set aside the impugned charge memo dated 30.08.2011 issued by the disciplinary authority as well as disagreement note dated 12.10.2012.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was selected for the post of Deputy General Manager on 14.02.2008. Thereafter, on 16.12.2010, he was put under suspensi...
Navneet Singh Anand Vs. Naveen Sareen and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-20-2012
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:20. 11.2012 CS(OS) 1448/2012 NAVNEET SINGH ANAND Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Ashish Aggarwal and Mr. Varun Sharma, Advocates versus NAVEEN SAREEN & ORS Through: ..... Defendant Mr. Ajay Digpaul and Ms. Arti Bansal, Advocates for the applicant in IA No.13060/2012. Ms. Hetu Arora Sethi, Adv. for D-1 to 3. And + CS(OS) 1449/2012 NAVNEET SINGH ANAND Through: ..... Plaintiff Mr. Ashish Aggarwal and Mr. Varun Sharma, Advocates versus NARESH KUMAR SAREEN & ANR Through: ..... Defendant Mr. Ajay Digpaul and Ms. Arti Bansal, Advocates for the applicant in IA No.13072/2012. Ms. Hetu Arora Sethi, Adv. for D-1 to 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) IA No.13060/2012 (under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC) in CS(OS) 1448/2012 And IA No.13072/2012 (under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC) in CS(OS) 1449/2012 CS(OS) No.1448/2012 is a suit for specific performance of the agreement to sell alleged to have been executed by Shri Madan Lal...
- ‹ Prev
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- Next ›
- Last »