Delhi Court November 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gujarat Indust.invest.Corpn.Ltd Vs. Crb Capital Markets Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2012
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:21. 11.2012 CO.APP. 8/2006 RESERVE BANK OF INDIA ..... Appellant versus CRB CAPITAL MARKETS LTD. . Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant Mr Parag Tripathi, ASG with Mr Ramesh Babu, Ms Manisha Nair, Mr Srinjoy Banerjee, Ms Swati Setia and Mr Anuj Bhandari, Advocates for RBI. Mr Bhavanishankar V. Gadnis, Adv. for Madgaun Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. in CM Nos. 12452-12453/2009. Mr Sanjeev Rajpal, Adv. for I.T. Department in CM No. 8021/2011. Ms Meenakshi Ogra with Mr Rajpal Singh and Ms Kanika Sharma for Applicant in CM No. 10739/2011. Mr Vijay Kumar for Karur Vysya Bank. For the Respondent Mr Sudhanshu Batra, Sr. Advocate with Mr Bhuvan Gugnani, Adv. for CRB Capital Markets Ltd. Mr Rajiv Bahl, for Official Liquidator AND + CO.APP. 9/2006 MALANPUR STEEL LTD. ..... Appellant versus CRB CAPITAL MARKETS LTD. C.A. Nos. 8/06, 9/06, 15/06, & 18/06 Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant Mr...
Pramod Kumar Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : November 21, 2012 + WP(C) 7249/2012 PRAMOD KUMAR ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.K.K.Rohatgi, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Anil Gautam, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) WP(C) 7249/2012 1. The grievance in the writ petition is that the Armed Forces Tribunal has gravely erred in not deciding the issue with respect to prayer B urged in the writ petition, which reads as under:B. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ or direction quashing para 7(a)(v) of Army Instructions AI 1/S/80 along with para 27(b) of MS Policy 04580/MS Policy dated 30.5.2000 as amended by 04580/MS Policy dated 18 July 2007 as arbitrary and ultra vires.2. But, learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to show to us any pleading before the Tribunal contained in the Original Application filed where the vires...
Malanpur Steel Ltd. Vs. Crb Capital Markets Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2012
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:21. 11.2012 CO.APP. 8/2006 RESERVE BANK OF INDIA ..... Appellant versus CRB CAPITAL MARKETS LTD. . Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant Mr Parag Tripathi, ASG with Mr Ramesh Babu, Ms Manisha Nair, Mr Srinjoy Banerjee, Ms Swati Setia and Mr Anuj Bhandari, Advocates for RBI. Mr Bhavanishankar V. Gadnis, Adv. for Madgaun Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. in CM Nos. 12452-12453/2009. Mr Sanjeev Rajpal, Adv. for I.T. Department in CM No. 8021/2011. Ms Meenakshi Ogra with Mr Rajpal Singh and Ms Kanika Sharma for Applicant in CM No. 10739/2011. Mr Vijay Kumar for Karur Vysya Bank. For the Respondent Mr Sudhanshu Batra, Sr. Advocate with Mr Bhuvan Gugnani, Adv. for CRB Capital Markets Ltd. Mr Rajiv Bahl, for Official Liquidator AND + CO.APP. 9/2006 MALANPUR STEEL LTD. ..... Appellant versus CRB CAPITAL MARKETS LTD. C.A. Nos. 8/06, 9/06, 15/06, & 18/06 Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant Mr...
Shri Vinay Kumar and anr. Vs. B.K. Jewellery House Marketing Ltd. and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:21. t November, 2012 + O.A. No.23/2012 in C.S.(OS) 466/2009 SHRI VINAY KUMAR & ANR. Through ..... Plaintiffs Mr. Gurinder Pal Singh and Mr. Mahendra Pratap, Advocates versus B.K. JEWELLERY HOUSE MARKETING LTD. & ORS. ..... Defendants Through Mr. Gaurav Mitra and Mr. Pratik Malik, Advocates + O.A. No.24/2012 in C.S.(OS) No.467/2009 SHRI SAJID JABBAR Through versus ..... Plaintiff Mr. B.K. Jha, Advocate B.K . JEWELLERY HOUSE MARKETING LTD. & ORS. ..... Defendants Through Mr. Gaurav Mitra and Mr. Pratik Malik, Advocates + O.A. No.25/2012 in C.S.(OS) No.468/2009 SHRI ANAND SHANKER Through ..... Plaintiff Mr. B.K. Jha, Advocate versus B.K. JEWELLERY HOUSE MARKETING LTD. & ORS. ..... Defendants Through Mr. Gaurav Mitra and Mr. Pratik Malik, Advocates CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.(Oral) 1. The present Chamber Appeals have been filed by the defendants No. 1 to 3 praying, inter alia, for setting aside the order date...
Anita and ors. Vs. Prem Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2012
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:21. t November, 2012 + FAO. 661/2002 ANITA & ORS. Through ..... Appellants Mr.Suresh C. Sati, Advocate versus PREM SINGH & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr.Pankaj Seth, Advocate for Insurance Company. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) C.M. APPL No.19461/2012(Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The Application stands disposed of. C.M. APPL No.19460 & 19462/2012 1. There is a delay of 451 days in filing the Application for restoration of the Appeal.2. The delay is condoned, subject to the condition that the factum of the delay shall be taken into consideration if the Appellants are able to make out a case for enhancement of compensation.3. For the reasons as stated in the Application, the Appeal is restored to its original number.4. Both the Applications are allowed. FAO. 661/2002 5. The Appeal is for enhancement of compensation of ` 4,37,000/- awarded by the Mot...
National Insurance Company Ltd Vs. Mahesh Chander Patney and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:21. t November, 2012 + MAC.APP. 268/2010 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD....... Appellant Through: Mr. Pradeep Gaur, Adv. versus MAHESH CHANDER PATNEY & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Respondent No.3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The present Appeal is dismissed in terms of the judgment passed today in MAC.APP. 259/2010 titled NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. V. NEERAJ PATNEY & ORS.2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE NOVEMBER 21 2012 vk...
Pradeep JaIn Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:21. t November, 2012 % + TEST. CAS. 60/2010 PRADEEP JAIN ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Smriti Vashisht, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Defendant Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) This is a petition for grant of probate in respect of the Will dated 14.08.2009 stated to have been executed by late Smt. Otto Jain, wife of the petitioner Pradeep Jain. It is stated in the petition that late Smt Otto Jain, who expired on 19.08.2009, had executed a Will dated 14.08.2009, bequeathing her estate to the petitioner. It is further stated in the petition that late Smt Otto Jain was survived by three LRs namely Pradeep Jain and two minor children namely Mast. Mrinal Jain and Mast. Hardik Jain.2. On filing of this petition, citation was published in newspaper. The petitioner being the natural guardian of his minor sons, no notice to the minor sons was issued.3. The petitioner filed affidavit of attesti...
National Insurance Co. Ltd Vs. Vinita Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2012
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:21. t November, 2012 + MAC. APP. 278/2011 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through Mr. Mohan Babu Aggarwal with Mr. Harkesh Chand Aggarwal, Advocates versus VINITA SINGH & ORS. Through ..... Respondents Ms. Amita Gupta, Advocate for the Respondent No.3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The present Appeal is dismissed in terms of the judgment passed today in MAC.APP.198/2011 titled NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. RISHI PRATAP SINGH & ORS.2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE NOVEMBER 21 2012 pst...
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Rishi Pratap Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2012
$~ 13 & 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:21. t November, 2012 + MAC. APP. 198/2011 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through Mr. Mohan Babu Aggarwal with Mr. Harkesh Chand Aggarwal, Advocates versus RISHI PRATAP SINGH & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Ms. Amita Gupta, Advocate for the Respondent No.3 + MAC. APP. 278/2011 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through Mr. Mohan Babu Aggarwal with Mr. Harkesh Chand Aggarwal, Advocates versus VINITA SINGH & ORS. Through ..... Respondents Ms. Amita Gupta, Advocate for the Respondent No.3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. These two Appeals (MAC.APP.198/2011 and MAC.APP.278/2011) arise out of a common judgment dated 29.11.2010 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(the Claims Tribunal) whereby a compensation of `20,000/- and `1,59,656/- respectively was awarded in favour of the First Respondent for having suffered injuries in a motor vehicle accident whic...
Satish Kumar Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % CRL.A. 695/2001 Date of Decision:21. t November, 2012 + # ! VINOD @ PARMOD Through: ..... Appellant Mohd. Nasir & Mohd. Saleem, Advocates versus $ STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP for the State WITH % # ! CRL.A. 703/2001 SANJAY KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocate. versus $ STATE OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP for the State AND % # ! CRL.A. 736/2001 SATISH KUMAR Through: ..... Appellant Mohd. Nasir & Mohd. Saleem, Advocates. versus $ * STATE OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN JUDGMENT P.K.BHASIN, J: The appellants had been convicted for the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 120-B IPC and 364/365/386/120-B of Indian Penal Code ('IPC' for short) by the learned Additional Sessions Judge vide judgment dated 28th August, 2001 and vide order dated 30th August, 2001 they had been sentenced to und...
- ‹ Prev
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- Next ›
- Last »