Delhi Court November 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Delhi Bisleri Co. Ltd. Vs. Suresh Kumar and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. h October, 2012 Pronounced on:22. d November, 2012 + MAC.APP. 679/2011 DELHI BISLERI CO. LTD. Through ..... Appellant Mr.Navneet Goyal with Ms. Suman N. Rawat, Advocates, Advocate versus SURESH KUMAR & ORS Through ..... Respondents Mr. Joy Basu with Ms. Ruchi B. Jain, Advocates for the Objector Insurance Company. Mr. Kamran Malik, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. The present Appeal is disposed of in terms of the judgment passed today in FAO.775/2003 titled NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. SURESH KUMAR & ORS.2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE NOVEMBER 22 2012 pst...
State Vs. Mohd. Naushad and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:18. 05.2012 PRONOUNCED ON:22. 11.2012 + DEATH SENTENCE REF. 2/2010 STATE Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl), for the State with Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate. Versus MOHD. NAUSHAD & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. K.K. Manan with Mr. Mustafa Arif, Advocates. Ms. Kamini Jaiswal with Mr. Abhimanue Shrestha, Advocates for A-5, 6 & 9. CRL.A. 948/2010, CRL. M. (BAIL) 1121/2010 JAVED AHMED KHAN @ CHHOTA JAVED ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Kamini Jaiswal with Mr. Abhimanue Shrestha, Advocate. versus THE STATE Through: Death Sent.2/10; Crl.A.948 to 951/10 ..... Respondent Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl), for the State with Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate. Page 1 CRL.A. 949/2010 MOHD. NAUSHAD Through: ..... Appellant Mr. K.K. Manan with Mr. Mustafa Arif, Advocates. Versus THE STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl), for the State with Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate. CR...
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Suresh Kumar and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:10. h October, 2012 Pronounced on:22. d November, 2012 + FAO.775/2003 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Joy Basu with Ms. Ruchi B. Jain, Advocates Versus SURESH KUMAR & ORS Through: + ..... Respondents Mr.Navneet Goyal with Ms. Suman. N. Rawat, Advocates for the Respondent No.2. Mr. Kamran Malik, Advocate for the Respondent No.3. MAC.APP. 679/2011 DELHI BISLERI CO. LTD. Through ..... Appellant Mr.Navneet Goyal with Ms. Suman N. Rawat, Advocates, Advocate versus SURESH KUMAR & ORS Through ..... Respondents Mr. Joy Basu with Ms. Ruchi B. Jain, Advocates for the Objector Insurance Company. Mr. Kamran Malik, Advocate for the Respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. These two Appeals(FAO.775/2003 and MAC.APP.679/2011) arise out of a common judgment dated 12.09.2003 whereby a compensation of `5,25,000/- was awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Claims Tribunal) in f...
Sunaina Devi and anr. Vs. Ram Phal and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:22. d November, 2012 + MAC.APP. 530/2009 SUNAINA DEVI & ANR. Through: ..... Appellants Mr.O.P.Mannie, Advocate versus RAM PHAL & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr.S.L.Gupta & Mr.Ram Ashray, Advocates for R-3 Insurance Company CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appeal is for enhancement of compensation of ` 3,56,800/- awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) in favour of the Appellants for the death of their son Satya Kishore Kumar, a bachelor, who suffered injuries in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 02.07.2007, resulting into his death on account of the injuries on 29.08.2007.2. In the absence of any Appeal by the driver, owner or the insurer, the finding on negligence has attained finality.3. During inquiry before the Claims Tribunal, it was claimed that the deceased Satya Kishore Kumar was in a private service and was earning `8,000/- per month. ...
National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Chander Vir and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. h September, 2012 Pronounced on:22. d November, 2012 + FAO 109/2004 NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. Through: Mr. L.K. Tyagi, Adv. ...... Appellant versus CHANDER VIR & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.1. The Appellant National Insurance Company Limited takes exception to an order dated 09.02.2004 passed by the Commissioner under Workmens Compensation Act, 1923 (the Act) awarding a compensation of `4,54,944/- in favour of the First Respondent for having suffered an employment injury viz., loss of one eye while he was driving bus not DL1PA-288 near village Chutmal Pur, District Saharanpur, U.P.2. On the basis of the evidence adduced by the First Respondent it was established that on 24.03.2003, the First Respondent was employed as a driver on bus No. DL-1PA-288. On the fateful day when he reached village Chutmal Pur, District Saharanpur, U.P. a truck bearing not U...
Parsvnath Developers Limited Vs. Rail Land Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: November 16, 2012 Pronounced on: November 22, 2012 + W.P.(C) 6693/2011 PARSVNATH DEVELOPERS LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vijay Nair, Mr. Rajat Joneja, Ms. Mitteli Kaushal and Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocates. versus RAIL LAND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through: Mr.A.S.Chandhiok, Additional Solicitor General with Mr.Amit Kumar, Mr.Ritesh Kumar, Mr.Sidharth Tyagi and Mr.Ankit Rajgaria, Advocates. + W.P.(C) 5089/2012 & CM No.10421/2012 (u/S 15.CPC) PARSVNATH DEVELOPERS LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vijay Nair, Mr. Rajat Joneja, Ms. Mitteli Kaushal and Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocates. versus RAIL LAND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through: Mr.A.S.Chandhiok, Additional Solicitor General with Mr.Amit Kumar, Mr.Ritesh Kumar, Mr.Sidharth Tyagi and Mr.Ankit Rajgaria, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR 1 The ent...
Hls Asia Ltd. Vs. M/S. Geopetrol International Inc. and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
* #25 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (Reportable) O.M.P. 801 of 2012 HLS ASIA LTD. Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Amit Gupta, Advocate versus M/S. GEOPETROL INTERNATIONAL INC. & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anuj Berry & Mr. Kamaljeet Singh, Advocates for Respondent No.1. Mr. Anukul Raj, Advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER 22 11.2012 1. This appeal by HLS Asia Ltd. (HAL) under Section 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) challenges the interim Award dated 29th May 2012 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal (Tribunal) accepting the plea of Respondent No.2/NTPC Ltd. (NTPC) that it be deleted from the arbitral proceedings.2. The background to the present appeal is that the contract for Wireline Logging Services (WLS) was entered into on 14th July 2009 between HAL and Respondent No.1/M/s. Geopetrol International Inc. (GII). The said contract clearly stated that GII was acting as an Operator of a block in Changlang District, Arunachal Pr...
Shri Jagmohan Kashyap Vs. Smt. Shiv Devi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + R.C.Rev.527/2012, CM 18382-84/2012, CAV.1107/2012 Date of Decision:22. 11.2012 SHRI JAGMOHAN KASHYAP Through: Petitioner Mr. Rajiv Kumar Ghawana, Advocate Versus SMT. SHIV DEVI & ORS. Through: Respondent Mr. N.N.Aggarwal and Mr. Rohit Gandhi, Advs. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J.(Oral) 1. This revision petition under Section 25B(8) of Delhi Rent Control Act is directed against the judgment and order dated 05.06.2012 of Senior Civil Judge-cum-Rent Controller (South) whereby leave to defend application filed by the petitioner, who was respondent in the eviction petition, was dismissed.2. The petitioner is tenant in respect of a shop under the respondents in property No. 1/17526, Gautam Nagar Road, Yusuf Sarai, New Delhi. His eviction was sought by the respondents for bonafide requirement of the said shop for enabling her younger son Ravi Kumar Meena to set up his business.3. The main pleas which were taken by the petitioner in ...
Montu @ Bahadur Vs. the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
$~12 & 13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON :22. d November, 2012 + CRL.A. 817/2012 MONTU @ BAHADUR ..... Appellant Through : Mr.S.K.Sethi, Advocate. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Sanjay Lao, APP. Insp.Digvijay Singh, PS Ambedkar Nagar. + CRL.A. 1111/2012 SAURAV @ KHOKAN ..... Appellant Through : Ms.Rakhi Dubey, Amicus Curiae. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Sanjay Lao, APP. Insp.Digvijay Singh, PS Ambedkar Nagar. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG SANJIV KHANNA, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The appellants impugn their conviction under Section 302 and 394 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code 1860 (IPC for short). For the offence under Section 302 IPC, the appellants have been sentenced to life imprisonment and fine of `10,000/- each, in default of payment of fine, they are to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two months. For the offence under Section 394 IPC, the appellants have ...
Rajiv Pratap Singh and ors. Vs. New India Assurance Company Ltd. and o ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d November, 2012 + MAC.APP. 1212/2012 RAJIV PRATAP SINGH & ORS. Through: Mr. J.S. Kanwar, Adv. ....... Appellants versus NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS..... Respondents Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL ORDER G. P. MITTAL, J.1. The present Appeal is allowed in terms of the judgment passed today in MAC.APP. 555/2011 titled NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. V. RAJIV PRATAP SINGH & ORS.2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE NOVEMBER 22 2012 vk...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »