Delhi Court November 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rattan Kumar Vs. D.D.A.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
35. $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7278/2011 % Judgment dated 22.11.2012 RATTAN KUMAR Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.R.K. Saini and Mr.Vikram Saini, Advs. versus D.D.A. Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Shobhana Takiar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Present petition has been filed by petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayers: a) A writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the case for peruse the same; b) A writ of Certiorari quashing the action of the respondent/DDA in cancelling the allotment of the LIG flat made in favour of the Petitioner under NPRS 197 after receiving back the allotment letter sent at the residential address given by him at the time of registration without trying to serve the same at the occupation address, despite the fact that the occupational address was also given at the time of registration and was available on record and then declining to make alternati...
NaraIn Singh and anr. Vs. Financial Commissioner and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d November, 2012 % + LPA No.591/2008 NARAIN SINGH & ANR. Through: ..... Petitioners Mr. Anand Yadav, Adv. Versus FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. N.S. Dalal & Mr. Devesh Pratap Singh, Advs. for R-2&3. Mr. S.P. Sharma & Mr. Jitender Chaudhary, Advs. for R1&4. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.This intra-court appeal impugns the judgment dated 14.07.2008 of a learned Single Judge of this Court dismissing the W.P.(C) No.670/1995 preferred by the appellants. The said writ petition was preferred impugning the order dated 10.02.1995 of the Financial Commissioner, Delhi in a proceeding preferred by the respondents No.2 and 3 i.e. Sh. Mohinder Singh and Sh. Rajinder Singh and setting aside orders of mutation (in favour of appellants) of land bearing Khasra No.6/19/2 admeasuring 4 Bighas 18 Biswas situated in the Revenue Estate of village Samai Pu...
C.Arunagiri Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: November 22, 2012 + W.P.(C) No. 7089/2012 C.ARUNAGIRI Represented by: ..... Petitioner Ms.Archana Ramesh, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by : Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. The petitioner was enrolled as a Sepoy in the Corps of Signals on January 10, 2001 and earned promotions, currently reaching the rank of a Naik.2. While working in an operational field area in Ladakh at an accident on November 21, 2008 the petitioner suffered grievous injuries resulting in his right leg being amputated right above the knee.3. Requiring family aid, not only physical but even by way of comfort, since the petitioner hails from the State of Tamil Nadu, he was posted at Chennai on February 15, 2010.4. Vide Signal dated July 14, 2012, the petitioner has been directed to report for duty at the Hea...
National Textile Corporation Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:22. 11.2012 + W.P.(C) 5527/2012 & CM 11291/2012 NATIONAL TEXTILE CORPORATION LTD. ... PETITIONER versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner: Mr. Sanjay Ghose and Mohd. Farrukh, Advocates For the Respondents: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Advocate for R-1 Mr. Kamal Khurana, Advocate for R-2 CORAM :HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J 1.The present writ petition has been filed to assail the notice dated 17.10.2011, issued by the Arbitrator, who is acting under the aegis of the Permanent Machinery of Arbitrators (in short PMA), established by the Govt. of India vide Office Memorandum dated 22.01.2004, in respect of disputes, concerning Central Public Sector Undertakings, Banks, Trusts and/or other Government departments.2. The Petitioner/National Textile Corporation Ltd. (in short NTC) has, at stage of issuance of notice by the learned Arbitrator, approached this...
Shri Ramesh Chand Aggarwal and ors. Vs. Mcd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) No.774/2001 22nd November, 2012 % SHRI RAMESH CHAND AGGARWAL & ORS. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Sanjay Manchanda, Adv. for plaintiff no.1 Mr. P.S.Bindra with Ms. Shweta Priyadarshini for LRs of plaintiff nos. 2 & 3. versus MCD Through : ..... Defendant Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Adv. for D-1/MCD. Mr. Rahul Gupta with Mr.Shekhar Gupta, Adv. for D-2. Mr. Ravi Chhabra, Adv. for D-3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. The subject suit has been filed by three plaintiffs claiming the following reliefs:(A) Pass a decree for permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the Defendant from in any manner dispossessing the Plaintiffs from their respective plots bearing No.40, 41 and 42 in colony known as Kalindi Colony Village Kilokri, Delhi. (B) Pass a decree for cancellation of Defendants letter dated 8th July, 1991. (C) Pass a decree for cancellation of Building over/Taki...
Anand Swaroop Goyal Vs. D.D.a
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
34. $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7262/2011 % Judgment dated 22.11.2012 ANAND SWAROOP GOYAL ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.R.K. Saini and Mr.Vikram Saini, Advs. versus D.D.A. Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Shobhana Takiar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Rule. With the consent of counsel for the parties, present writ petition is set down for final hearing and disposal.2. The necessary facts, to be noticed for disposal of the present writ petition, are that the petitioner registered himself with the respondent DDA under the New Pattern Registration Scheme, 1979, for allotment of a LIG flat on making payment of the registration deposit. At the time of registration, the petitioner had informed DDA his residential address as House not WZF/46, Millap Nagar, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi, where he was living at that time. The petitioner had also informed the DDA with regard to his occupational address as C/o Garrison Engineer, MES, Delhi C...
Anurag Sahai Vs. D.D.A.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
33. $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7247/2011 % Judgment dated 22.11.2012 ANURAG SAHAI Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.R.K. Saini and Mr.Vikram Saini, Advs. Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Sushil Dutt Salwan and Latika Dutta, Advs. versus D.D.A. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Present petition has been filed by petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayers: a) A writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the case for perusal; b) A writ of Certiorari quashing the action of the respondent/DDA in cancelling the allotment of the LIG flat made in favour of the allottee under NPRS 197 after receiving back the allotment letter sent at the residential address given by him at the time of registration without trying to serve the same at the occupation address, despite the fact that the occupational address was also given at the time of registration and was available on record and then declining to mak...
Mirza Nissar HussaIn @ Naza Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:18. 05.2012 PRONOUNCED ON:22. 11.2012 + DEATH SENTENCE REF. 2/2010 STATE Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl), for the State with Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate. Versus MOHD. NAUSHAD & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. K.K. Manan with Mr. Mustafa Arif, Advocates. Ms. Kamini Jaiswal with Mr. Abhimanue Shrestha, Advocates for A-5, 6 & 9. CRL.A. 948/2010, CRL. M. (BAIL) 1121/2010 JAVED AHMED KHAN @ CHHOTA JAVED ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Kamini Jaiswal with Mr. Abhimanue Shrestha, Advocate. versus THE STATE Through: Death Sent.2/10; Crl.A.948 to 951/10 ..... Respondent Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl), for the State with Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate. Page 1 CRL.A. 949/2010 MOHD. NAUSHAD Through: ..... Appellant Mr. K.K. Manan with Mr. Mustafa Arif, Advocates. Versus THE STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl), for the State with Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate. CR...
Commission Commercial Tax, Govt. of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Official Liquid ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:22.11.2012 CO.A(SB) 43/2012 COMMISSION COMMERCIAL TAX, GOVT. OF MADHYA PRADESH ..... Appellant Through Ms. Indrani Mukherjee, Adv. for IARC (assignee of SCB) versus OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR Through ..... Respondent Mr. Mayank Goel, Adv. for the Official Liquidator. Mr. Jaswinder Singh, Adv. for Central Bank of India. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1 This appeal has been directed against the order of the Official Liquidator wherein the present appellant (Commercial Tax, Government of M.P- hereinafter referred to as the appellant) has been ranked as a preferential creditor. His submission is that in terms of the provisions of 33-C of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 and Section 53 of the M.P. Commercial Tax Act, 1994, any amount of tax/penalty/interest payable by a dealer or other person under this Act shall be first charge on the property of the dealer or such person and as such h...
Mansi Vohra Vs. Ramesh Vohra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 2474/2012 MANSI VOHRA Through ..... Petitioner Mr. Prem Prakash, Advocate versus RAMESH VOHRA Through ..... Respondent Mr. S.K. Aggarwal and Mr. Sanjay Kumar Joshi, Advs. Date of Decision:22. d November, 2012 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J.(Oral) 1. Present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr. P.C. challenging the order dated 17th March, 2012 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) in Criminal Revision Petition No. 147 of 2011 wherein it was held that the petition filed by a major unmarried daughter for maintenance was not maintainable under Section 125 Cr.P.C. The ASJ in the impugned order dated 17th March, 2012 has held as under:8. I have bestowed my careful consideration to the rival submissions made by learned counsel for revisionist as well as learned counsel for respondent in the light of the relevant provisions of law as well as the cases relied upon in support of their respectiv...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »