Delhi Court November 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Aditya Gupta @ Babloo Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :05. h October, 2012 Date of Decision:22. d November, 2012 CRIMINAL APPEAL 478 2011 ADITYA GUPTA @ BABLOO ..... Appellant Through Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP for the State. CRIMINAL APPEAL 936 2011 BABU HASAN ..... Appellant Through Ms. Aishwarya Rao, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP for the State. CRIMINAL APPEAL 989 2011 DHARMENDER KUMAR ..... Appellant Through Ms. Aishwarya Rao, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP for the State. CRIMINAL APPEAL 895 2012 SHAMBHU @ SHYAM SHARMA ..... Appellant Through Mr. Jawahar Raja, Advocate. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG SANJIV KHANNA, J.Subject matter of challenge in these four appeals by Aditya Gupta @ Babloo, Babu Hasan, Dharmender Kumar and Shambhu @...
National Highways Authority of India Vs. Hindustan Construction Compan ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:22. 11.2012 + FAO (OS) No.47 of 2012 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Meenakshi Sood, Mr. Mukesh Kumar & Ms. Preeti Gupta, Advs. Versus HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sameer Parekh, Mr. D.P. Mohanty & Ms. Suman Yadav, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.(Oral) 1. A contract was awarded by the appellant to the respondent/contractor for construction of Allahabad Bypass Project in U.P. vide an agreement dated 2.6.2004. The project stands completed. Disputes arose inter se the parties which were referred to the Disputes Resolution Board (for short DRB) consisting of three technical experts from the field, who opined in favour of the appellant. The respondent being dissatisfied with the same sought a reference of disputes to arbitration in view of the arbitration...
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Lal Pari (Since Deceased) and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:22. d November, 2012 + MAC. APP. 554/2005 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ram N.Sharma, Advocate versus SMT. LAL PARI (SINCE DECEASED) & ORS. Through: None. ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appellant Oriental Insurance Company seeks reduction of compensation of ` 5,77,000/- awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) in favour of Respondents No.1 and 2 for the death of Dhukam Sharma who died in a motor vehicle accident which took place on 04.08.1999.2. It is an admitted case of the parties that on the date of death, the deceased Dhukam Sharma was survived by his widow Smt. Lal Pari and his parents who are Respondents No.1 and 2 herein. During the pendency of the Claim Petition, Smt. Lal Pari also died (a natural death).3. The sole submission raised by the learned counsel for the Appellant is that since the dependents w...
Mohd. Ali Bhatt @ Kille Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:18. 05.2012 PRONOUNCED ON:22. 11.2012 + DEATH SENTENCE REF. 2/2010 STATE Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl), for the State with Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate. Versus MOHD. NAUSHAD & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. K.K. Manan with Mr. Mustafa Arif, Advocates. Ms. Kamini Jaiswal with Mr. Abhimanue Shrestha, Advocates for A-5, 6 & 9. CRL.A. 948/2010, CRL. M. (BAIL) 1121/2010 JAVED AHMED KHAN @ CHHOTA JAVED ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Kamini Jaiswal with Mr. Abhimanue Shrestha, Advocate. versus THE STATE Through: Death Sent.2/10; Crl.A.948 to 951/10 ..... Respondent Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl), for the State with Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate. Page 1 CRL.A. 949/2010 MOHD. NAUSHAD Through: ..... Appellant Mr. K.K. Manan with Mr. Mustafa Arif, Advocates. Versus THE STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl), for the State with Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate. CR...
Senior Citizen Council of Delhi Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d November, 2012 % + L.P.A. No.613/2012, CM Nos.15559/2013 & 15561/2012 Senior Citizen Council of Delhi ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Arvind Kumar Sharma, Adv. Versus Delhi Development Authority ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ajay Verma, Adv. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.This intra court appeal impugned the order dated 7.8.2012 of the Learned Single Judge dismissing the WP (C) No.4716/2012 preferred by the appellant, as well as the order dated 23.8.2012 in CM No.10120/2012 filed by the appellant in the said disposed of writ petition. Counsel for the respondent DDA appeared on advance notice and was vide order dated 12.9.2012 directed to produce the files relating to the construction and maintenance of old age corner as well as of construction of rain shelter in the Deer Park. On the subsequent date, even though the record was not produced but certain interim measur...
Ashok Kumar Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : November 22, 2012 + WP(C) 7236/2012 ASHOK KUMAR Petitioner Represented by: Ms.Rekha Palli, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..Respondents Represented by: Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. The petitioner holds the rank of a Lt.Colonel in the Indian Army and based on his qualifications and experience was deputed to work in the office of the Directorate of Quality Assurance (DGQA) on December 28, 2008 and after two years became eligible for being permanently absorbed in DGQA, which in the parlance of the department is called Permanent Secondment. His case for Permanent Secondment was considered by a Board and notwithstanding the Indian Army according its consent for petitioners Permanent Secondment, the Board constituted held against petitioners Permanent Secondment holding he...
Mohd. Naushad Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON:18. 05.2012 PRONOUNCED ON:22. 11.2012 + DEATH SENTENCE REF. 2/2010 STATE Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl), for the State with Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate. Versus MOHD. NAUSHAD & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. K.K. Manan with Mr. Mustafa Arif, Advocates. Ms. Kamini Jaiswal with Mr. Abhimanue Shrestha, Advocates for A-5, 6 & 9. CRL.A. 948/2010, CRL. M. (BAIL) 1121/2010 JAVED AHMED KHAN @ CHHOTA JAVED ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Kamini Jaiswal with Mr. Abhimanue Shrestha, Advocate. versus THE STATE Through: Death Sent.2/10; Crl.A.948 to 951/10 ..... Respondent Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl), for the State with Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate. Page 1 CRL.A. 949/2010 MOHD. NAUSHAD Through: ..... Appellant Mr. K.K. Manan with Mr. Mustafa Arif, Advocates. Versus THE STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl), for the State with Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Advocate. CR...
inderjeet Singh Tosaria Vs. D.D.A.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
$~30. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5189/2011 % Judgment dated 22.11.2012 INDERJEET SINGH TOSARIA ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.R.K. Saini and Mr.Vikram Saini, Advs. versus D.D.A. Through : ..... Respondent Mr.M.K. Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Present petition has been filed by petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayers: a) A writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the case for perusal; b) A writ of Certiorari quashing the action of the respondent/DDA in cancelling the allotment of MIG flat No.157, Pocket D, Sector 18, Rohini, New Delhi, made in favour of the petitioner under NPRS, 1979 after non-delivery of allotment letter sent at the residential address given at the time of registration, despite the fact that the occupational address of the Petitioner was also given by the Petitioner at the time of registration and was available on record, and then declining to res...
New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs. Rajiv Pratap Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:22. d November, 2012 + MAC.APP. 555/2011 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ....... Appellant Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv. versus RAJIV PRATAP SINGH & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. J.S. Kanwar, Adv. for R-1 to 3. + MAC.APP. 1212/2012 RAJIV PRATAP SINGH & ORS. Through: Mr. J.S. Kanwar, Adv. ....... Appellants versus NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ORS..... Respondents Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Adv for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appellant New India Assurance Company Limited seeks reduction of compensation of `6,59,000/- awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) for the death of Ajay Pal Singh, who died in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 27.02.2010.2. The finding on negligence reached by the Claims Tribunal is not challenged by the Appellant Insurance Company. Thus, the same has attained finality.3. During inquiry before th...
Darshan Singh Bugga Vs. D.D.A.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-22-2012
31. $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5698/2011 % Judgment dated 22.11.2012 DARSHAN SINGH BUGGA ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.R.K. Saini and Mr.Vikram Saini, Advs. versus D.D.A. Through : ..... Respondent Ms.Shobhana Takiar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J (ORAL) 1. Present petition has been filed by petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayers: a) A writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the case for perusal; b) A writ of Certiorari quashing the action of the respondent/DDA in cancelling the allotment of MIG flat No.157, Pocket D, Sector 18, Dwarka, New Delhi, made in favour of the petitioner under NPRS, 1979 after non-delivery of allotment letter sent at the residential address given at the time of registration, despite the fact that the occupational address of the Petitioner was also given by the Petitioner at the time of registration and was available on record, and then declining to r...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »