Delhi Court November 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds — plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed — log in to pick up where you left off.
Commissioner of Income Tax Central I New Delhi Vs. J B Roy
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h November, 2012 + + ITA 546/2010 ITA 942/2010 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL I NEW DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus J B ROY Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Percy J.Pardiwalla, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Satyen Sethi and Mr. Arta Trana Panda, Advocates. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR R.V. EASWAR,J: (OPEN COURT) For orders see ITA 258/2010. R.V.EASWAR, J S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J NOVEMBER 30 2012 Bisht...
State Bank of Patiala Vs. Nascent Educational and Development Society ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Crl. M.C. No. 3841/2011 + Date of Decision:30. h November, 2012 # ! STATE BANK OF PATIALA ....Petitioner Through: Mr. J.S. Lamba, Advocate Versus $ * NASCENT EDUCATIONAL AND DEVELOPMENT SOCIETY& ANR. Through: Respondents None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER P.K.BHASIN, J: This petition has been filed by the petitioner-bank under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of the criminal complaint filed against it by the respondent no. 1 herein under Sections 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act and Sections 420 & 406 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.2. The complaint made by the respondent no.1/ complainant was that the respondent no. 2 herein owed to it a sum of Rs. 1,39,700/- and in discharge of that liability he gave one demand draft bearing no. 790547 dated 22.2.07 for Rs. 1,39,700/- issued by State Bank of Patiala, Sanjay Place Branch, Agra. However, when the same was presented by the respondent no.1 complaina...
Super Cassettes Industries Ltd Vs. Dy.Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :1. t October, 2012 Date of Decision :30. h November, 2012 % + + + + W.P.(C) 3406/2000 W.P.(C) 6310/2000 W.P.(C) 6320/2000 W.P.(C) 6308/2000 SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES LTD ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Satyen Sethi with Mr. Arta Trana Panda, Advocates. versus DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Rajpal, Sr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR R.V. EASWAR, J.: These are four writ petitions, two each by Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. and Tony Electronics Ltd., which later merged with the former company. Since the facts and the controversy are more or less similar in all the four writ petitions, and since they were also heard together, they are disposed of by a common judgment.2. We may first take up the writ petitions filed by Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. The petitioner is a public limited company having its registered office at Greater Kailash, New Delhi and...
Wens International Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Airport Authority of India a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON:30. 11.2012 + W.P.(C) 2734/2012 WENS INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD AND ANR Through: ..... Petitioners Mr.Sankar Divete & Mr.Soumya Dutta, Advs. versus AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Digvijay Rai, Standing Counsel for Airport Authority of India. Mr.V.C. Jha for Ms.Sonia Sharma, Sr. Standing Counsel for R-2. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The petitioners claimed a direction that the payment made by the Airports Authority of India by letter dated 14.02.2007, in respect of the service tax liabilities imposed in this case are to be paid by it.2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner successfully bid and granted licence for management of car rental and car parking for domestic and international airport terminal building at NSCBI Airport, Kolkata in March 2001. On 16.6.2001, an agreement detailing the terms and conditions W.P....
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Sarita and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2012
$ 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h November, 2012 + MAC. APP. 904/2006 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate. Versus SARITA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. This Appeal is directed against a judgment dated 05.09.2006 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(the Claims Tribunal) whereby a compensation of `2,02,000/- was awarded in favour of the First Respondent for having suffered injuries in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 09.10.2005.2. Since the finding on negligence is not challenged by the Appellant Insurance Company; the same has attained finality.3. There is twin challenge to the impugned judgment. First, the compensation awarded is excessive and exorbitant, particularly a sum of `32,824/- was reimbursed by Chola Mandalam General Insurance Co.(Chola Mandalam) under the Group Health Insurance Scheme obtained by the ...
Phonographic Performance Ltd. Vs. Ht Media Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment Reserved on: May 16, 2012 Judgment delivered on: November 30, 2012 I.A. No.17604/2011 & I.A. No.20715-16/2011 in CS(OS) No.2749/2011 Phonographic Performance Ltd. ..... Plaintiff Represented by: Mr. N.B. Joshi, Adv. with Mr. Niraj Gupta & Mr. Purushottam Mishra, Advs. versus HT Media Ltd. Represented by: ..... Defendant Mr Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. K. Datta, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. The plaintiff filed the suit for injunction, infringement of copyright and damages.2. By this order, I shall dispose of IA No.17604/2011 filed by the plaintiff and IA No.20715/2011 filed by the defendant, both applications are under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 CPC, 1908 seeking injunction. a) IA No.17604/2011 filed by the plaintiff contained the following prayers : i) Pending the hearing and final disposal of the above suit this Honble Court, by an order of temporary injunction, be pleased to restrain the D...
May Fair Investment Pvt Ltd Vs. ----
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2012
$~A42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:30th November, 2012 % + CO. APPL. (M) 182/2012 IN THE MATTER OF MAY FAIR INVESTMENT PVT LTD ..... Petitioner/ Transferor Company No. 1 AND PRAKAUSALI INVESTMENT (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner/ Transferor Company No. 2 WITH MAY FAIR CAPITAL PVT. LTD Through: ..... Petitioner Transferee Company Mr. Saurabh Kalia and Mr.Sameer Chaudhary, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1. This is a first motion joint application under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, (for short Act) in connection with the Scheme of Amalgamation and Arrangement (for short Scheme) among May Fair Investments Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as First Transferor Company) and Prakausali Investment (India) Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Second Transferor Company) with MayFair Capital Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferee Company). A copy of the proposed Scheme is filed ...
Madan Lal Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2012
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:30. 11.2012 CRL. A. 366/1997 MADAN LAL ... Appellant versus STATE OF DELHI ... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr K.B. Andley, Sr. Adv. with Mr M.L. Yadav, Adv. : Mr Pawan Narang, Adv. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MS JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J 1.This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 11.09.1997 delivered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Shahdara, Delhi, in Sessions case No. 76/1996, arising out of FIR No. 78/1993, registered on 24.07.1993 under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959. The said FIR was registered at police station Geeta Colony, Delhi. This appeal is also directed against the order on sentence passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge on 15.09.1997 whereby the appellant was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for life for the offence punishable...
Ratnagiri Gas and Power Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Joint Venturre of Whessoe Oil
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:3. d October, 2012 Date of Decision:30. h November, 2012 % + FAO (OS) 484/2012 RATNAGIRI GAS AND POWER PVT. LTD. Through: ..... Appellant Mr. A. S. Chandiok, ASG with Ms. Bindu Saxena, Mr. Shailendra Swarup, Ms. Aparajita Swarup, Ms. Neha Khattar and Mr. K. K. Patra, Advocates. versus JOINT VENTURRE OF WHESSOE OIL AND GAS LTD. (WOGL) AND ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Dheeraj Nair, Mr. Divyam Agarwal and Ms. Smita Bhargava, Advocates for respondents. Mr. Sanjiv Kakra and Mr. Bharat Arora, Advocates for State Bank of India. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR R.V. EASWAR, J.: This is an appeal filed by Ratnagiri Gas and Power Pvt. Ltd., hereinafter referred to as the appellant against the judgment and order dated 10-9-2012 passed by the learned single judge in OMP No. 482/2011 in proceedings initiated under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act, ...
The Commissioner of Income Tax-xiii Vs. Sh. Kanwaljit Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. 10.2012 Pronounced on :30. 11.2012 + ITA 607/2010 ITA 921/2010 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -XIII Appellant Through: Ms. Rashmi Chopra, Sr. Standing Counsel. Versus ..Respondent SH. KANWALJIT SINGH Through: Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Sh. Ashwani Taneja, Ms. Rani Kiyala, Sh. Piyush Singh and Ms. Ayushi Pareek, Advocates. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The present appeals are allowed in view of the separate judgment passed today in ITA 602/2010 between the same parties. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J R.V.EASWAR, J NOVEMBER 30 2012 ITA 607/2010 & 921/2010 Page 1...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »