Delhi Court November 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Suneel Kumar Khatri Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2012
2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2826/2012 Date of decision:23. d November, 2012 % SUNEEL KUMAR KHATRI Through : ..... Petitioner Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr. Saqib, Adv. for R-1 to R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA GITA MITTAL, J.(Oral) 1. On account of the petitioners competence, knowledge and expertise with regard to matters relating to IT, the petitioner was posted on 1st August, 2005 with Electronic Data Process (EDP) Cell of the Directorate General of the CRPF at New Delhi. There is no dispute that by a signal dated 2nd August, 2005 the petitioner and 35 other inspectors were promoted to the Bihar sector to the post of Asst. Commandant (at page 18).2. The order of promotion dated 2nd August, 2005 contained the following mandatory condition: (3) All promotes shall be relieved immediately on receipt of unit allotment and will be directed to join new place latest b...
Manohar Lal Vij Vs. Cbi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2012
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :23. d November, 2012 % + CRL.MC.3991/2012 MANOHAR LAL VIJ ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Sanchit Dhawan, Ms.Preeti Gupta and Mr.Ajay Saroya, Advs. versus CBI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms.Sonia Mathur, Standing Counsel for R-1/CBI. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J.(Oral) % Crl.M.A. Nos. 19079-80 of 2012 (Exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of. Crl.M.C No.3991/2012 and Crl.M.A. No.19078/2012 (Stay) 1. This is a petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of RC not DAI-2003(A)-0049 registered with PS CBI/ACB/New Delhi as well as the chargesheet and the criminal proceedings pending pursuant thereto against the petitioner, in view of the compromise entered into between petitioner and respondent No.2-Bank in civil litigation. Alongwith the petition, the petitioner has also annexed the copy o...
Canton Marketing Pvt Ltd Vs. ----
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:23.11.2012 + CO.APPL.(M) 178/2012 In the matter of an application under Section 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 AND In the matter of Scheme of Amalgamation of CANTON MARKETING PVT LTD Transferor/Applicant Company With ASF INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED Transferee Company/Applicant Company Through: Mr.Ashish Middha, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1. This is a first motion joint Application under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, in connection with the Scheme of Amalgamation CO.A(M) No.178/2012 of Canton Marketing Private Limited Page 1 of 3 i.e. Transferor/Applicant Comp0any with ASF Infrastructure Private Limited i.e. Transferee Company. A copy of the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation is filed along with the Application.2. The registered offices of both the Transferor and Transferee Companies are situated within the National Capital Territory of Delhi and are wi...
Union of India and anr. Vs. V.K.Saldhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:23. 11.2012 W.P.(C) 2789/2012 & CM 6016/2012 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Petitioners versus V.K.SALDHI & ORS. ..... Respondents and W.P.(C) 2790/2012 & CM 6018/2012 UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Petitioners versus ANIL VERMA ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in these cases: For the Petitioners : Mr Rajinder Nischal For the Respondents : Mr Ajesh Luthra in WP(C) No.2789/2012. Mr Deepak Verma in WP(C) No.2790/2012. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1. These writ petitions raise a common issue and, therefore, are being disposed of together. The writ petitions arise out of the common order dated 14.11.2011 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in OA No.3783/2010 and OA No.3035/2011. By virtue of the said order dated 14.11.2011, the respondents herein and the applicants before the Tribunal (except Mr N.C....
Prem Kumar Sharma Vs. Naresh Kumar Saini and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2012
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + R.C.Rev.560/2012 & CM Applications 19504/2012 and 19505/2012 Date of Decision:23. 11.2012 PREM KUMAR SHARMA Through: Petitioner Mr. Ashwani K. Dubey, Adv. Versus NARESH KUMAR SAINI & ANR. Through: None. Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J.(Oral) 1. This revision petition seeks assailing of order dated 14.09.2012 of ADJ-1, North whereby an application under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC, filed by the petitioner, who was the plaintiff in the suit CS 98/2009, was dismissed.2. The petitioner had filed a suit for recovery of possession, arrears of rent, mesne profits and mandatory injunction against the respondents. The case was set up on the averments that the suit property was let out by the petitioner to respondent No. 1 and who in turn had sub let the same to respondent No. 2, without the consent of the petitioner. The application under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC was filed by the petitioner alleging that he is entitled to a decree of po...
icici Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Smt. Renu and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d November, 2012 + MAC.APP. 117/2011 ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ....... Appellant Through: Ms. Suman Bagga, Adv. versus SMT. RENU & ORS. Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL ..... Respondents JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) CM APPL.18291/2011 1. The cost of `2,000/- imposed on the Appellant by the Registrar vide an order dated 31.08.2012 is waived.2. The Application stands disposed of. MAC.APP. 117/2011 3. Since the liability of the Appellant is not disputed, at the request of learned counsel for the Appellant, service of Respondent No.4 is dispensed with.4. The Appeal is for reduction of compensation of `8,07,880/- awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) for the death of Kapil, who died in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 30.03.2007.5. The Appellant Insurance Company does not challenge the finding on negligence. Thus, the same has attained finality.6. ...
Kumud Rani Garg Vs. University of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: November 23, 2012 + W.P.(C) No.5740/2012 KUMUD RANI GARG Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Pankaj Sinha, Advocate versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Ms.Maninder Acharya, Advocate with Mr.Varun Gupta, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Petitioner, a young lady who is visually impaired has approached this Court being aggrieved by the decision taken by the Provost of Meghdoot Hostel, University of Delhi not to extend permission granted to the petitioner to reside in the hostel.2. The reason given by the Provost is that the University Rules/Ordinance has an outer limit of residency being 6 years with entitlement to be extended by 6 months upon special considerations being shown.3. Pointing out that in the hostel 3% seats are reserved for visually/hearing and physically impaired students, it is asserted th...
Rajender and anr. Vs. Sepy. M.S. Reddy and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:23. d November, 2012 + MAC. APP. 555-556/2005 RAJENDER & ANR. Through: ..... Appellants Mr. Peeush Sharma, Advocate versus SEPY. M.S. REDDY & ANR. Through: None. ..... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appeal is for enhancement of compensation of ` 2,41,500/- awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) in favour of the Appellants for the death of their son Monu (aged 20 years and a bachelor at the time accident), in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 17.11.1999.2. During inquiry before the Claims Tribunal, it was claimed that the deceased Monu was a fruit vendor and was earning `70/-, ` 80/- & ` 100/per day.3. In the absence of any cogent evidence with regard to the deceaseds income, the Claims Tribunal took the deceaseds income as per the minimum wages, that is, ` 2350/- per month; deducted 50% towards personal and living expenses as the dec...
Niraj Kumar Vs. Cwc and Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2012
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:23. 11.2012 + W.P.(C) No.1469/2012 NIRAJ KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Shankar Raju, Advocate. Versus CWC & ANOTHER ..... Respondents Through: Mr.K.K.Tyagi and Mr.Iftekhar Ahmed, Advocates for Respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Vide the instant petition, the petitioner has assailed the impugned order dated 23.09.2011, whereby the services of the petitioner have been terminated. The petitioner further seeks direction to re-instate him in service with all consequential benefits including back wages and continuity of service.2. Case of the petitioner is that he belongs to OBC category being Kurmi by caste, which right from the inception of Mandal List falls under the OBC category. The petitioner till date falls under the non-creamy layer as certified by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Patna Sadar.3. The petitioner was appointed as Senior Assistant Manager (General) w.e.f. 2...
Indian Hockey Federation Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-2012
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5626/2010 INDIAN HOCKEY FEDERATION ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Arvind K. Nigam, Sr. Adv. with Ms Manmeet Arora & Ms Vasundhara Kumar, Advs. versus UOI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Lovkesh Sawhney, Adv. for R-2. Mr Sanjeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Ms Shyel Trehan & Ms Diya Kapur, Advs. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER ORDER 23 11.2012 % CM 18719/2012 (for directions) 1. Notice in the captioned application was issued on 21.11.2012, when arguments of warring parties were heard at length. The learned counsel for the petitioner at the said hearing has confined his relief to the following, which is, therefore the only outstanding issue, which I am required to examine, in view of urgency in the matter. The relevant portion of my order dated 21.11.2012 is as follows: I have heard arguments for quite some time in the matter. Mr.Nigam confines his relief to the following: First, the petitioner should be allowed to vo...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- Next ›
- Last »