Delhi Court November 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Parmeshwari Devi (Now Deceased) Through Lrs Vs. Shri Dalbir Singh ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2012
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + R.C.REV. 238/2012 Date of Decision:26. 11.2012 SMT. PARMESHWARI DEVI (NOW DECEASED) THROUGH LRs Petitioner Through: Mr. Mayank Wadhwa, Advocate. Versus SHRI DALBIR SINGH (NOW DECEASED) THROUGH LRs .. Respondent Through: Mr. R.P.Pandey, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J.(Oral) 1. This revision petition under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (for short the Act) impugns the order dated 24.12.2011 of the learned Addl. Rent Controller (North), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, whereby the leave to defend application filed by the petitioners in the eviction petition filed against them by the respondents, was dismissed, and eviction order was passed by the Addl. Rent Controller.2. Before proceeding to see the merit in the petition, it may be noted that earlier on 28.5.2012, the learned counsel Sh. J.C.Mahindro appeared for the petitioners and addressed the arguments before my predecessor, and on instructions from the pet...
Ms. Pallavi Bishnoi Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2012
$~ 3, 8, 11-15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: November 22, 2012 Judgment Pronounced on: November 26, 2012 + W.P.(C) 6100/2012 & CM No.16465/2012 MS. NISHA Represented by: Advocates. ..... Petitioner Mr.S.S.Pandey, and Mr.H.S.Tewari, versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Ankur Chibber, Mr.Anil Gautam, Mr.Aditya Malhotra and Mr.MP Singh, Advocates for UOI. Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Advocate for AICTE. AND W.P.(C) 6185/2012 & CM No.16618/2012 MS. SONAM DUBEY Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.K.Ramesh, Advocate with Ms. R.Archana, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Ankur Chibber, Mr.Anil Gautam, Mr.Aditya Malhotra and Mr.MP Singh, Advocates for UOI. AND W.P.(C) 6186/2012 & CM No.16620/2012 MS. VANDANA Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.K.Ramesh, Advocate with Ms.R.Archana, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Ankur Chibber, Mr.Aditya Malhotra and M...
Rajeev Sapra Vs. Delhi Vidyut Board and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2012
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h November, 2012 + W.P. (C) 5230/1999 RAJEEV SAPRA ..... Appellant Through: Petitioner in person. versus DELHI VIDYUT BOARD AND ANR. Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR R. V. EASWAR, J: (OPEN COURT) This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the orders dated 02.12.1998 and 17.05.1999 passed by the Chairman of the Delhi Vidyut Board (DVB) and seeking quashing thereof.2. The petition arises this way. The petitioner joined DVB as Inspector (T) in October, 1988 and while discharging duties for the employer in Zone Prehaladpur, District Bawana, North-West Delhi he was assaulted by some miscreants and suffered fracture. He, therefore, remained hospitalized from 02.03.1992 to 18.03.1992. During this period he was on medical leave. He joined duties on 20.03.1992. On 11.11.1994 a chargesheet was issued against the petitioner on the ground that while he was working as Inspector in ...
Ms. Nisha Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2012
$~ 3, 8, 11-15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: November 22, 2012 Judgment Pronounced on: November 26, 2012 + W.P.(C) 6100/2012 & CM No.16465/2012 MS. NISHA Represented by: Advocates. ..... Petitioner Mr.S.S.Pandey, and Mr.H.S.Tewari, versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Ankur Chibber, Mr.Anil Gautam, Mr.Aditya Malhotra and Mr.MP Singh, Advocates for UOI. Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Advocate for AICTE. AND W.P.(C) 6185/2012 & CM No.16618/2012 MS. SONAM DUBEY Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.K.Ramesh, Advocate with Ms. R.Archana, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Ankur Chibber, Mr.Anil Gautam, Mr.Aditya Malhotra and Mr.MP Singh, Advocates for UOI. AND W.P.(C) 6186/2012 & CM No.16620/2012 MS. VANDANA Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.K.Ramesh, Advocate with Ms.R.Archana, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Ankur Chibber, Mr.Aditya Malhotra and M...
Ms. Sonam Dubey Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2012
$~ 3, 8, 11-15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: November 22, 2012 Judgment Pronounced on: November 26, 2012 + W.P.(C) 6100/2012 & CM No.16465/2012 MS. NISHA Represented by: Advocates. ..... Petitioner Mr.S.S.Pandey, and Mr.H.S.Tewari, versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Ankur Chibber, Mr.Anil Gautam, Mr.Aditya Malhotra and Mr.MP Singh, Advocates for UOI. Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Advocate for AICTE. AND W.P.(C) 6185/2012 & CM No.16618/2012 MS. SONAM DUBEY Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.K.Ramesh, Advocate with Ms. R.Archana, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Ankur Chibber, Mr.Anil Gautam, Mr.Aditya Malhotra and Mr.MP Singh, Advocates for UOI. AND W.P.(C) 6186/2012 & CM No.16620/2012 MS. VANDANA Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.K.Ramesh, Advocate with Ms.R.Archana, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Ankur Chibber, Mr.Aditya Malhotra and M...
State Bank of India Vs. Pushpa Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision: November 26, 2012 RFA(OS) 117/2012 STATE BANK OF INDIA Appellant Represented by: Mr.S.N.Relan, Advocate. versus PUSHPA SINGH Represented by: Nemo. ..... Respondent AND RFA(OS) 119/2012 STATE BANK OF INDIA Appellant Represented by: Mr.S.N.Relan, Advocate. versus VIRENDRA SINGH Represented by: Nemo. ..... Respondent AND RFA(OS) 121/2012 STATE BANK OF INDIA Appellant Represented by: Mr.S.N.Relan, Advocate. versus RAJENDRA SINGH Represented by: Nemo. RFA(OS)s No.117, 119, 121 & 122 of 2012 AND RFA(OS) 122/2012 STATE BANK OF INDIA Appellant Represented by: Mr.S.N.Relan, Advocate. versus BHUPENDRA SINGH ..... Respondent Represented by: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) CMs No.19657/2012 & 19659/2012 in RFA(OS) 117/2012; CMs No.19732/2012 & 19734/2012 in RFA(OS) No.119/2012; CMs No.19746/2012 & 19748/2012 in RFA(OS) No.121/2012; and CMs No.19756/2012 ...
Gireesan A. Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % CRL.A. 123/1998 Date of Decision:26. h November, 2012 + # GIREESAN A. ! ..... Appellant Through:Mr. N. Hariharan, Mr. Vaibhav Sharma & Mr. Amit Satija, Advocates versus $ * STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through:Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN JUDGMENT P.K.BHASIN, J: The appellant-accused was a traffic constable in Delhi Police and on 23rd April, 1993 while he was performing traffic duty alongwith one Sub-Inspector Vijender Pal Sharma both of them were arrested by the anti-corruption branch officials for their having demanded and accepted bribe of Rs.50/- from one truck driver Bhupinder Singh for not challaning him. The bribe was allegedly demanded by the said SubInspector and on his direction was accepted by the appellant herein from the said Bhupinder Singh. Both of them were apprehended in a trap laid by the anti-corruption branch officials who were present near the place where bribe was demanded b...
Naval Mahajan Vs. Neha Arora
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:26. 11.2012 TEST. CASE No.45/2009 NAVAL MAHAJAN Through: versus ..... Petitioner Mr. K.G. Seth, Advocate NEHA ARORA .....Respondent Through: None AND + TEST. CASE No.46/2009 NAVAL MAHAJAN Through: versus ..... Petitioner Mr. K.G. Seth, Advocate NEHA ARORA .....Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.(ORAL) IAs No. 21194/2012 (O. 6 R. 17 CPC) in Test. Case No. 45/2009 and 21193/2012 (O. 6 R. 17 CPC) in Test. Case No. 46/2009 These are two applications for amendment of Test. Case Nos. 45/2009 and 46/2009. For the reasons stated in the applications, they are allowed and the amended petitions in both the cases are taken on record. The applications stand disposed of. TEST. CASE Nos.45/2009 and 46/2009 1. The Test. Case No.45/2009 is a petition for grant of Letter of Administration which was initially filed before the learned District Judge, Delhi on 23.03.2009. The petition was filed by ...
Amit Johri Vs. Deepak Johri and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + I.A. No.18548/2011 (by defendants No.11 and 12 u/O VII R 1.CPC in CS(OS) No. 818/2011 Reserved on: Date of decision: IN THE MATTER OF: AMIT JOHRI 30 08.2012 26.11.2012 ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rajiv K. Garg, Advocate with Mr. Ashish Garg, Advocate versus DEEPAK JOHRI AND ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Pratap Shanker, Advocate with Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advocate for D-1. Mr. J.K. Seth, Senior Advocate with Ms. Shalini Kapoor and Ms. Promil Seth, Advocates for D-11 and D-12. CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J.1. The present application has been filed by the defendants No.11 and 12 under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, praying inter alia for rejection of the accompanying suit instituted by the plaintiff for declaration, partition, possession and permanent injunction in respect of property bearing municipal No.1112, Chatta Madan, Gopal Maliwara, Chandani Chowk, Delhi, or in the alternative, for recovery of `50 lacs alongwith interest, o...
indermani Vs. Ajay Prakash Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2012
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + R.C. Rev 563/2012 Date of Decision:26. 11.2012 INDERMANI ...Petitioner Through: Mr. R.S. Kela, Adv. Versus ...Respondent AJAY PRAKASH GUPTA Through: Mr. Shiv Charan Garg & Mr. Imran Khan, Advs. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J.(Oral) 1. This is a revision petition under Section 25 B (8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (for short the Act), assailing the order dated 06.06.2012, passed by the court of Sh. S.K. Malhotra, SCJ cum RC, North Delhi, whereby the leave to defend application was dismissed and an order of eviction was passed.2. The facts of the case leading to the passing of the impugned order are as under. The petitioner was a tenant in respect of two rooms, kitchen, bathroom, covered verandah in front of the aforesaid two rooms, open terrace till brick wall and common WC on the second floor of property bearing municipal no. 6571, Block-D, Kamla Nagar, Delhi-110007 (hereinafter referred to as the tenanted property). An evic...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »