Delhi Court November 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Sompal and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h August, 2012 Pronounced on:27. h November, 2012 + MAC APP. 168/2008 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. .... Appellant Through: Mr. Joy Basu, Advocate versus SOMPAL & ORS. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Manjeet Chawla, Advocate for Claimant. Mr. P.K. Seth, Advocate for Respondent/ Tagore International School. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The present Appeal is dismissed in terms of the judgment passed today in MAC.APP. 167/2008, titled ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. BABY KOMAL & ANR.2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE NOVEMBER 27 2012 vk...
Technology Development Board (Tdb) Vs. M/S Usha (India ) Ltd and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS)No. 754/2002 % November 27, 2012 TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT BOARD (TDB) ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Suraj Kumar with Mr. Rakesh Bhardwaj, Advs. versus M/S USHA (INDIA ) LTD AND ANR. Through: Counsel for the applicant/defendant. (appearance not given). ..... Defendants CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) IA No.7524/2005(u/O.37 R.5 CPC r/w S.22 of SICA 1985 & IA No.17059/2012(u/S.8 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996) in CS(OS) No.754/2002 1. The present suit for recovery of Rs.1,38,04,188/- was filed by the plaintiff-Technology Development Board against two defendants. The first defendant is the Company-M/s. Usha (India) Ltd. and the second defendant is Sh.Vinay Rai, the guarantor and director of the defendant no.1.2. The subject suit was filed under Order 37 CPC as a summary suit way back in the year 2002 in which no proceedings could take place immediately afte...
The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Master Abhishek and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h August, 2012 Pronounced on:27. h November, 2012 + MAC.APP. 209/2008 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Joy Basu, Advocate versus MASTER ABHISHEK & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Chawla, Advocate for Claimant. Mr. P.K. Seth, Advocate for Respondent/Tagore International School. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The present Appeal is dismissed in terms of the judgment passed today in MAC.APP. 167/2008, titled ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. BABY KOMAL & ANR.2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE NOVEMBER 27 2012 vk...
The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Smt. Savitri and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h August, 2012 Pronounced on:27. h November, 2012 + MAC.APP. 201/2008 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Joy Basu, Advocate versus SMT. SAVITRI & ANR. Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Manjeet Chawla, Advocate for Claimant. Mr. P.K. Seth, Advocate for Respondent/Tagore International School. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The present Appeal is dismissed in terms of the judgment passed today in MAC.APP. 167/2008, titled ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. v. BABY KOMAL & ANR.2. For detailed order, please see the above mentioned judgment. (G.P. MITTAL) JUDGE NOVEMBER 27 2012 vk...
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Baby Komal and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. h August, 2012 Pronounced on:27. h November, 2012 + MAC.APP. 167/2008 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Joy Basu, Advocate versus BABY KOMAL & ANR. Through: + ..... Respondents Ms. Manjeet Chawla, Advocate for Claimant. Mr. P.K. Seth, Advocate for Respondent/Tagore International School. MAC.APP. 168/2008 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Joy Basu, Advocate versus SOMPAL & ORS. Through: + ..... Respondents Ms. Manjeet Chawla, Advocate for Claimant. Mr. P.K. Seth, Advocate for Respondent/Tagore International School. MAC.APP. 169/2008 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Joy Basu, Advocate versus RAM AVTAR & ANR. MAC APP 167/2008 Etc. Through: + Ms. Manjeet Chawla, Advocate for Claimant. Mr. P.K. Seth, Advocate for Respondent/Tagore International School. MAC.APP. 170/2008 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Joy Basu, Advocate ...
Constable (Exe.) Samir Bage and Another Vs. Gnct of Delhi Lt. Governor ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2012
Oral: (G. George Paracken:) Both these Original Applications are identical and, therefore, they are being disposed of by this common order. For the sake of convenience, the facts in OA 2180/2012 have been taken and they are as under. 2. In response to the Office Memorandum No. 3475-3515/Trg. Br. Ist Bn. DAP dated 01.07.2011 issued by the respondents regarding selection of Constables (Executive) for Armourers Course, the applicant submitted his application and the same was duly forwarded to the Deputy Commissioner of Police (Ist Bn.) Delhi by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, South District, vide Annexure-6 letter dated 25.07.2011 but it was returned immediately by the DCP (DAP) on 27.07.2011 itself seeking a clarification whether the applicant was unmarried or not and making it clear that only unmarried Constables will be considered for the said course. As the applicant was married person, his application was not thereafter forwarded. 3. However, the private respondents 7 and 8, namel...
M/S. Hansa Tubes (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise Chandigar ...
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2012
Archana Wadhwa: After hearing both sides, I find that the dispute involved in the present appeal relates to admissibility of Cenvat credit in respect of various iron and steel products falling under Chapter 72 and 73 of the Central Excise Tariff Act. The appellants contention is that some of these goods were used in maintenance and repair of machines and overhead cranes. 2. Commissioner (Appeals) while dealing with the said submissions of the appellants has observed that they have contended that various iron and steel items were used for repair of plant and machinery but no evidence, in this regard, has been placed on record. As such, by observing that same were used in the manufacture of supporting structure for overhead cranes in the factory, he rejected the appellants prayer for allowing the credit. 3. I find that the legal issue is no more res integra. If the items stand used as supporting structures, the credit is not admissible in terms of declaration of law by the Larger Bench i...
Ms. Vandana Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2012
$~ 3, 8, 11-15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: November 22, 2012 Judgment Pronounced on: November 26, 2012 + W.P.(C) 6100/2012 & CM No.16465/2012 MS. NISHA Represented by: Advocates. ..... Petitioner Mr.S.S.Pandey, and Mr.H.S.Tewari, versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Ankur Chibber, Mr.Anil Gautam, Mr.Aditya Malhotra and Mr.MP Singh, Advocates for UOI. Mr.Amitesh Kumar, Advocate for AICTE. AND W.P.(C) 6185/2012 & CM No.16618/2012 MS. SONAM DUBEY Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.K.Ramesh, Advocate with Ms. R.Archana, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Ankur Chibber, Mr.Anil Gautam, Mr.Aditya Malhotra and Mr.MP Singh, Advocates for UOI. AND W.P.(C) 6186/2012 & CM No.16620/2012 MS. VANDANA Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.K.Ramesh, Advocate with Ms.R.Archana, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr.Ankur Chibber, Mr.Aditya Malhotra and M...
Sushila Vs. Mahender Sharma and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h November, 2012 + MAC. APP. 5/2010 SUSHILA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. versus MAHENDER SHARMA & ORS. ...... Respondents Through Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) 1. The Appeal is for enhancement of compensation of `1,49,272/- awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) in favour of the Appellant Smt. Sushila for having suffered injuries in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 20.11.2004.2. In the absence of any Appeal by the driver, owner or the Insurance Company, the finding on negligence has attained finality.3. In the accident the rear wheel of the bus ran over the right leg of the Appellant. She (the Appellant) suffered fracture of shaft of femur with fracture shaft and tibia fibula with degloving injury. Immediately after the accident, the Appellant was removed to Sanjay Gandhi Memorial Hospital where ...
Smt. Darshana Gupta and anr. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2012
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:26. h November, 2012 % + LPA No.771/2012 SMT. DARSHANA GUPTA & ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. N.S. Dalal & Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advs. Versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sumit Chander, Adv. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW D. MURUGESAN, CHIEF JUSTICE CM No.19727/2012 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application is disposed of. LPA No.771/2012 1. This intra-court appeal impugns the order dated 19.11.2012 of the learned Single Judge refusing to entertain W.P.(C) No.7215/2012 preferred by the appellant and relegating the appellant to the statutory remedy of appeal. The said writ petition was filed by the appellant impugning the order dated 12.11.2012 of refusal of No Objection Certificate / Permission for transfer of land, admeasuring 1058 sq. yds. out of Khasra No.142/778 situated in the extended Lal Dora of village Kanjhawala, Delhi, appl...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »