Delhi Court January 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt.Kiran Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2012
$-14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON : 24th January, 2012 + Crl.A.No.416/1997 SMT.KIRAN ....Appellant. Through : Mr.Bhupesh Narula, Amicus Curiae. Versus STATE ...Respondent. Through : Mr.Sanjay Lao, APP for the State. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J. (OPEN COURT).1. The present Appeal is directed against the Judgment and Order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge dated 30.06.1997 whereby the present Appellant-Kiran was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment with a fine of `500/-..2. The prosecution's allegations are that during the night intervening 4/5.10.1995, intimation was received by PS Gokalpuri that an incident had occurred at around 1:30 A.M. at House No.D-38, Bhagirathi Vihar, Delhi. The police personnel were deployed; upon reaching the spot, it was discerned that Sukhbir Singh, husband of the Appellant-Kiran had been beaten to death. The ...
T and T Motors Ltd Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Income Tax Appeal No.899. of 2010 Reserved on: 16th November, 2011 % Date of Decision: 24th January, 2012 T and T Motors Ltd. ....Appellant Through Mr. Pradeep K. Bakshi and Mr. Rajat Navet, Advocates. Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax ...Respondent Through Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Sr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR.1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.2. To be referred to the Reporter or not ?.3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest SANJIV KHANNA, J. The present appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) involves the question whether the appellant T and T Motors Pvt. Ltd. is liable to pay Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT, for short) on car accessories provided to the customers, i.e. the car buyers. Revenue submits that FBT has to be paid under Section 115WB(2)(D) as the car accessories were provided by the a...
Regency Soraj Infrastructures Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITON (CIVIL) NOS. 13825/2009 and 7699/2010 Reserved on: 22nd November, 2011 % Date of Decision:24th January, 2012 REGENCY SORAJ INFRASTRUCTURES ...Petitioner Through Mr. Porus F. Kaka, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Divesh Chawla, Mr. Arvind Gupta and Ms. Shiny Varghese, Advocates. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA and OTHERS .....Respondents Through Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, ASG with Ms. Sonia Mathur and Ms. Riya Kaul, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Kiran Babu, Sr. Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.3 and.4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.: The petitioner- Regency Soraj Infrastructures is a joint venture between M/s Flower Valley Properties and Buildcon and M/s L.K. Corporation. Pursuant to permission granted by the District Industrial Centre vide letter dated 3rd January, 2005 and the commencement certificate dated 7th January, 2005 issued by the Pune Municipal Corporation, they have constructed W.P. (C) Nos...
Union of India and anr Vs. R. K Sareen
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2012
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 24.01.2012 + W.P.(C) 476/2012 UNION OF INDIA and ANR ... Petitioners versus R. K SAREEN ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr V. S. R. Krishna with Mr Kumar Rajesh Singh For the Respondent : None CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.K. JAIN BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL).1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 12.08.2011 in OA 760/2005 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, whereby the Tribunal concluded as under:- "9. Thus, in view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of S.K. Kapoor (supra), leaving other grounds open, we are of the view that the impugned order is required to be set aside and matter is required to be remitted back to the disciplinary authority on the limited ground that the disciplinary authority shall pass fresh order after taking into consideration the objections to be f...
N.S. Hoon Vs. Uoi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2012
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (Crl.) No.1048/2011 Reserved on: 01.12.2011 Pronounced on: 24.01.2012 N.S. Hoon ...... Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person Versus UOI and Anr. ...... Respondents Through: Mr. P.K. Sharma, Standing Counsel for CBI with Mr. Udai Prakash, Advocate Mr. Jatan Singh, Advocate for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J..1. The petitioner has filed a Criminal Writ petition under Article 226 for the issuance of writ of mandamus against the respondents claiming that he was falsely implicated in the criminal proceedings .He has demanded criminal action to be taken against the respondents and Rs. 5000 crores as damages..2. The facts leading to the present writ petition are that RC8/87/SIU-VIII was registered in CBI/SIU-VIII Units(EOW-III) on the basis of information received by CBI on 26.06.87 that the petitioner during the period from 21.04.87 to 06.05.87 stayed in Hotel Ambassador at New Delhi by giving false particulars about h...
Sushil Kumar and ors Vs. the Director General of Works,
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 24.01.2012 + LPA 13/2003 SUSHIL KUMAR and ORS ..... Appellants Through : Sh. R.K. Kapoor, Ms. Anita Sharma and Ms. Shweta Kapoor, Advocates. Versus THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF WORKS, CPWD..... Respondents Through : Sh. Sanjeev Sabharwal with Sh. Hem Kumar, Advocates, for Govt. of NCT of Delhi. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE S.P. GARG MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) %.1. The controversy in this appeal pertains to the correctness of the judgment dated 25.11.2002, of a learned Single Judge of this Court, by which W.P. 5743/2001 was rejected. The appeal was received by this Bench today; with consent of counsel for parties, it was finally heard..2. The facts are that the present appellants - eight in number - claimed to have worked as Pump Operators in the establishment of the respondent L.P.A. 13/2003 Page 1 organization - Central Public Works Department (CPWD). It was alleged that they were "Work-Charged" em...
Smt. Kanta Rani Vs. the Registrar General and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on 19.01.2012 Judgment pronounced on 24.01.2012 + W.P.(C) 697/2011 Smt. Kanta Rani ... Petitioner versus The Registrar General and Anr ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr P.S.Mahendru For the Respondent : Mr Syed Ahmed Saud for Respondent No.1 Ms Avnish Ahlawat and Ms Urvashi Malhotra for Respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN V.K.JAIN, J..1. One Shri V.P.Gulati was facing trial before the Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi and the petitioner before this Court was posted as the Reader in that Court. A complaint was made by Shri V.P.Gulati alleging therein that the petitioner had called him at his residence and asked him to come and meet her in the Court in which she was posted. He further alleged that the petitioner told him that if he pays Rs1. lac to her then the Judge would give bail to her. He also alleged that the petitioner took...
Crl.A. 511/2011, Crl. M. (Bail) Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 24.01.2012 + CRL.A. 511/2011, Crl. M. (Bail) 680/2011 GHULAM QADIR BHAT @ GHULAM QADIR BHATT @ BABA ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Kamini Jaiswal, Advocate along with the appellant in person. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Sh. Dayan Krishnan, ASC, for the State. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE S.P. GARG MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT %.1. This will dispose of the appeal against an order of the Designated Court, under Prevention of Terrorism Act, by which Ghulam Qadir Bhat was convicted of various offences and sentenced to undergo RI for different terms. By a judgment and order dated 23.01.2012, this Court had disposed of connected appeals by co-accused, based on statements made by them and their counsel (in Crl. A. Nos. 229/2011, Crl. A. 281/2011, Crl. A. 307/2011 and Crl. A. 986/2011)..2. The Appellant and others, who had approached this Court - Tariq Mehmood and Ishaq Ahmed (in Crl. A. 229/2011), Arshad K...
Lok Pal Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation Dtc Head Quarters, Ip Depot, I ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2012
Dr. A.K. Mishra, Member (A) 1. Challenging the order dated 26.11.2010 of the respondent authority by which both the service of the applicant was terminated and it was held that he was not entitled to back wages on the ground that he was a daily wage employee, the applicant has filed this O.A. and sought the following reliefs:- “(i) Set aside order of the respondent terminating service of the Applicant and direct reinstatement of the Applicant with back wages and other consequential benefit. Such other relief as this Hon’ble Tribunal deems fit in the interest of justice.” 2. The applicant was engaged as a daily rated Conductor with the respondent Corporation on 04.08.1998. While he was working as Conductor in Bus No. 3777 in Route Delhi-Balaji, the vigilance staff made a surprise check and issued a challan report against him alleging that he had permitted seven passengers to travel without ticket after collecting money from them. A charge memo containing these allegati...
D.K. Sinha Vs. Union of India Through Secretary, Ministry of Micro, Sm ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-24-2012
V.K. Bali, Chairman: 1. D. K. Sinha, the applicant herein, has filed this Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, calling in question the Presidential order according sanction for departmental proceedings against him under rule 9 of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 (hereinafter to be referred as the Rules of 1972), as contained in order dated 21.11.2007 issued under signatures of the Additional Development Commissioner and Chief Vigilance Officer, Office of the Development Commissioner (Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises), New Delhi, along with its enclosures, i.e., the memorandum, Annexure-I (statement of articles of charge); Annexure-II (statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehaviour in support of the articles of charge); and Annexure-III (list of documents). 2. Shorn of unnecessary verbiage, the facts that may be relevant for adjudication of the points raised in the present OA would reveal that the applicant while wor...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »