Delhi Court January 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds - plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vikrant Kapoor Vs. the State and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2012
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl.M.C. No. 3918/2009 Reserved on: 12.01.2012 Pronounced on: 27.01.2012 VIKRANT KAPOOR ...... PETITIONER Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Mr. Sanjay Bhardwaj, Mr. Rajinder Singh, Advocates. Versus THE STATE and ORS. ...... RESPONDENT Through: Ms.Fizani Husain, APP. Mr.Manish Sharma, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J..1. This petition is filed under Section 482 CrPC read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 8.9.2009 of learned ASJ in Crl.Rev.P. 254/2009 whereby the revision petition filed by the petitioner was dismissed and also challenging the order dated 10.7.2009 of learned Metropolitan Magistrate where the application of the petitioner filed under Section 156(3) CrPC was dismissed..2. The petitioner herein had filed a complaint on 25.5.2008 with P.S. Kotla Mubarakpur alleging that the respondent No.2. in connivance with respondent Nos. 3, 4 and 5 had conspired to misappropriate Fla...
Mahender Singh Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 23.01.2012 Judgment pronounced on: 27.01.2012 + W.P.(C) 301/2012 MAHENDER SINGH ... Petitioner versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI and ORS. ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : M.M.Sudan alongwith petitioner-in-person. For Respondent : Mr Viraj Datar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN V.K. JAIN, J..1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 04.7.2011, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as "the Tribunal") in OA No. 1719/2010, filed by the petitioner was dismissed..2. The petitioner is a Head Constable in Delhi Police. He was charge-sheeted on the allegation that on 19.2.2008, while posted at Aaya Nagar Police Picket, he stopped a van carrying SI Sanjay Gupta and Head Constable Ranbir of Vigilance Branch of Delhi. The petitioner pointed out to SI Sanjay Gupta and Head W.P(C) 3...
Social Jurist, a Civil Rights Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2012
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) NO. 7802 OF 2011 and CM No.20148/2011 RESERVED ON: 18th January, 2012 % PRONOUNCED On: 27th January, 2012 SOCIAL JURIST, A CIVIL RIGHTS GROUP ...PETITIONER through : Mr. Ashok Agarwal, Ms. Kusum Agarwal, Mr. Khagesh B. Jha, Advocates VERSUS GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI and ANR ...RESPONDENTS through: Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani, Adv. for Respondent No.1 Ms. Shobha Gupta with Ms.Hema Shekhawat, Advs. for Respondent No.2 CORAM :- HONBLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW A.K. SIKRI, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE:.1. In this petition filed by the petitioner, categorizing the same as Public Interest Litigation, the petitioner complains about the following purported failures on the part of Respondent No.1, Government of NCT of Delhi: (i) Failure to prevent unaided recognized private schools of Delhi from admitting children below 4 years age in formal schools. (ii) Failure to ensure that all unaided recognized private schools in Delhi have...
Harsh Talwar Vs. Rani Gadhoke Decd. Through Lrs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment: 27.01.2012 + CM (M) No. 107/2012, CAV No.92/2012 and CM Nos.1660- 62/2012 HARSH TALWAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjiv Kakra, Advocate. versus RANI GADHOKE DECD. THROUGH LRS .... Respondent Through: Mr.Sanjeev Sindhwani, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J. (Oral) 1 Order impugned before this Court is the judgment of the Additional Rent Control Tribunal (ARCT) dated 20.10.2011 which in an appeal under Section 38 of the Delhi Rent Control Act (DRCA) had endorsed the finding of the Additional Rent Controller (ARC) dated 19.04.2008 wherein the eviction petition filed by the landlord namely Rani Gadhoke (through legal representatives) and others seeking eviction of the tenant Harsh Talwar from the second floor of property No. 44, Ring Road, Lajpat Nagar, ITI, New Delhi on the grounds contained in Section 14 (1) (c), (d) and (h) of the DRCA had been decreed.2. Record discloses that the eviction p...
Nizam @ Titto ..A-4 Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : 4th January, 2012 DECIDED ON : 27th January, 2012 + CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.852, 813 and 891/2009 CRL.APPEAL- 891/2009 JAMAL MIRZA ..... A-1 AND MOHD.FARUQ@ MOHD.RAJU (SINCE DECEASED) ..... A-2 AND CRL.APPEAL-852/2009 ALAM @ MAMOON ..... A-3 AND CRL.APPEAL- 813/2009 NIZAM @ TITTO .....A-4. Through: Mr. Avninder Singh, Advocate for Appellant in Crl.A.813/2009. Ms. Purnima Sethi, Advocate for Appellant in Crl.A.852/2009. Ms. Anu Narula, Adv. for Appellant in Crl.A.891/2009 . versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP on behalf of State in all the Appeals. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG Crl.A.Nos.852/09, 852/09 and 813/09 Page 1 of 30 S.P.GARG, J..1. The Appellants Jamal Mirza (A-1), Mohd. Faruq @ Mohd.Raju (A-2) (since released), Alam @ Mamoon (A-3) and Nizam @ Mijam @ Titoo (A-4) (hereafter referred to by their names) have preferred the present appeals against the judgment and order on senten...
# P.N. Saluja Vs. $ State Bank of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Review Petition No. 380/2011 in W.P(C)1300/1988 + Date of Decision: 27th January, 2012 # P.N. SALUJA ....Petitioner ! Through: Petitioner in person Versus $ STATE BANK OF INDIA ....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajiv Kapur and Ms. Vatsala Rai, Advocates. CORAM: * HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K.BHASIN ORDER P.K.BHASIN, J: This review petition under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been filed by the petitioner, who is a dismissed employee of the respondent State Bank of India and who had filed a writ petition for quashing of entire disciplinary proceedings initiated against him for some acts of misconduct in the eighties and which had culminated into imposition of the penalty of his dismissal from service, and he is seeking review of the judgment dated 13th January, 2011 passed by me whereby the order dated 21st November, 1985 of the appellate authority of the respondent bank confirming the decision of the disciplinary authority taken on 24th...
Dr. Virender Singh Lather Vs. the Secretary, Agriculture
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on 20.01.2012 Judgment pronounced on 27.01.2012 + W.P.(C) No. 10916/2005 Dr. Virender Singh Lather, ... Petitioner versus The Secretary, Agriculture Scientists Recruitment Board, New Delhi and Anr. ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Nidhesh Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Tarun Gupta For the Respondent : Mr Himanshu Bajaj for Respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN V.K.JAIN, J..1. This Writ Petition is directed against the order dated 8.2.2005 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal), whereby OA No. 1339/03 filed by the petitioner was dismissed..2. Pursuant to an advertisement issued by Agriculture Scientists Recruitment Board, New Delhi (ASRB), the petitioner applied for the post of Principal Scientist (Genetics/Cytogenetics) and was selected by the Interview Bo...
Pradeep Kumar Vs. Union of India Through Secretary Ministry of Earth S ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2012
ORAL: M.L. Chauhan: 1. The applicant has filed the present OA, thereby praying for the following reliefs:- “(a) to call for the records of the employment of the applicant along with details of the vacancies available for casual employment; (b) to re-engage the applicant in any of the Regional Centres of the Meteorological Department; (c) to regularize the service of the applicant against existing regular vacancies as he fulfills all the eligibility requirements; (d) to pass such further order(s) as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case; and (e) to impose heavy costs on the Respondents for causing unnecessary harassment to the applicant.” 2. Briefly stated, facts of the case, as projected in this OA, are that the applicant was appointed in the office of the respondents as Safaiwala on daily wages on muster roll through employment exchange on 22.2.2005. His grievance is that since he lodged a complaint in SC/ST Commission ...
Harpal Singh Vs. Union of India Through General Manager Northern Railw ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2012
M.L. Chauhan: 1. The applicant has filed the present OA, thereby praying for the following reliefs: “a. Directing the respondents to place the relevant records i.e. the copy of the casual labour live register prepared by the respondents for engagement of the casual labourers in terms of the circular dated 28.06.1987 showing the names of remaining casual labourers in the casual labour live register. b. To quash and setting aside the impugned order dated 13.10.2006 issued by the respondents with all other consequential benefits after declaring the same is as illegal, unjust, arbitrary, malafide, unconstitutional, against the principles of natural justice, violative of the Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the constitution of India and in violation of the mandatory provisions of law. c. Allowing the present O.A. of the applicant with all other consequential benefits and cost. d. Any other fit and proper relief may also be granted.” 2. Briefly stated, facts of the case, as projected by...
Dariya Singh Vs. Union of India Through Its Secretary, Ministry of Hom ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2012
ORAL: Mrs. Meera Chhibber, Member (J): 1. Applicant has sought direction to the respondents to appoint him for the post of Constable (Executive) Male Delhi Police Recruitment, 2009 along with all benefits and allowances with effect from 17.8.2011, i.e., the date of termination. 2. It is submitted by the applicant that he was appointed as Constable on 5.7.2010. He continued to perform his duties but show cause notice dated 12.1.2011 was issued to him (page 15) by alleging that at the time of filling the application form applicant did not mention details of the criminal proceedings in column No.15 (a) to (e) rather mentioned ‘No’ against each column whereas the police verification report received in Recruitment Cell, Delhi Police from SP/Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) revealed that a case FIR No. 31/2000 under Section 447/435 IPC, PS Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan, was registered against him. He had thus suppressed his criminal involvement in the application as well as in the ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »