Delhi Court January 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds — plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed — log in to pick up where you left off.
Mac.App. 101/2012 Vs. Bhagwati Fabrics and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2012
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 30th January, 2012 + MAC.APP. 101/2012 MEENA and ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Manish Maini, Advocate versus BHAGWATI FABRICS and ANR. ..... Respondents Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J.(ORAL) C.M. APPL. No.1718/2012 (delay in refiling) There is a delay of 10 days in refilling the Appeal. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in refiling the Appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of. CM. APPL. No.1717/2012(delay) For the reasons given in the application, the delay in filing the Appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of. MAC. APP. No.101/2012.1. This Appeal is for enhancement of compensation for the death of Hari Kumar who was aged about 38 years at the time of the accident which took place on 25.11.2007. In a petition under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, the Claims Tribunal MAC. APP. No.101/2012 Page 1 of 5 by the impugned ...
Union Of India Vs. Rail Coach Factory Men'S Union
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2012
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LPA 550 OF 2010 Reserved on: 01.11.2011 % Pronounced on: 30.01.2012 UNION OF INDIA ... APPELLANT Through: Mr. Jagjit Singh, Advocate. VERSUS RAIL COACH FACTORY MEN'S UNION . . . RESPONDENT Through: Dr. Aman Hingorani, Advocate with Ms. Swati Sumbly, Advocate. CORAM :- HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW A.K. SIKRI, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE.1. The respondent herein is a trade union of workers of Railway Coach Factory (RCF), Kapurthala. It is duly registered under the Indian Trade Unions Act, 1926 and is affiliated to the All India Railwaymens Federation (AIRF), New Delhi as also to the Hind Mazdoor Sabha, Mumbai..2. The Railway Coach Factory workers are the members of the respondent union which is treated at par with the Railway Production Units (RPUs). Though in respect of Zonal Railways, the Ministry of Railway LPA 550/2010 1 of 16 (Central) has the policy for recognition of unions based on secret ballot, though ...
Mohd. Mehfuz Vs. State (Gnct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.APPEAL No.898/2009 % Judgment reserved on : 18th January, 2012 Judgment delivered on: 30th January, 2012 MOHD. MEHFUZ ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Rakhi Dubey, Adv. versus STATE (GNCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Naveen Sharma, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J..1. Instant appeal has been preferred from Jail by appellant against the impugned judgment dated 28.08.2008 and order on sentence dated 30.08.2008 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi in case FIR No.706/2005 under Section 394/397/411/34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 read with Section 27 Arms Act, 1959, police station Darya Ganj, Delhi..2. Vide impugned judgment dated 28.08.2008 appellant has been held guilty for the offence under Section 392/394 read Section 397 Indian Penal Code, 1860 and vide order on sentence dated 30.08.2008 Crl.Appeal No.898/2009 Page 1 of 7 he has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years for all...
Dinesh Kumar Mittal Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2012
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 1009/2011 Date of Decision:30.01.2012 DINESH KUMAR MITTAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. D. Roy Chaudhary, Senior Advocate with Mr. D. Moitra and Mr. Rajesh Anand, Advocates versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Fizani Husain, APP for State with Inspector Sanjay Dutt, SI Mahender Singh. 00 Mr. K.K. Manon and Mr. Vibhor Garg, Advocates for complainants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J. (Oral).1. The petitioner seeks grant of bail under section 439 Cr. P.C. in FIR No. 152/2008 under section 302/120-B/34 IPC, P.S. Kalkaji..2. The petitioner is facing trial with co-accused persons in this case on the allegations that on 7th April 2008 one businessman Arun Gupta was shot dead by three unknown motorcycle borne assailants near his residence. He died instantly. Having regard to the broad day light murder in the market, the investigation was transferred to Special Cell. During investigation, on the basis...
Puneet Agarwal Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4614 of 2000 Reserved On: 9th December, 2011 % Pronounced On: 30th January, 2012 PUNEET AGARWAL . . . PETITIONER Through: Mr. G.D. Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. S.K. Sharma, Advocate. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA and ORS. . . .RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jatan Singh, Advocate. CORAM :- HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA A.K. SIKRI, Acting Chief Justice.1. The petitioner herein was selected in Indian Administrative Service in Civil Services Examination (CSE, 1997). He belongs to the General Category and secured fifth position in the combined merit list of the said examination. He was allocated to Manipur - Tripura joint cadre of the IAS. According to him, this allotment of Maniput-Tripura cadre was contrary to the provisions of principles of cadre allocation as enumerated in D.O. letter dated 31.5.1985 and on the right application of the aforesaid provisions, he should have been allocated Maharashtra cadre. His repres...
Smt. Jugan K. Mehta Vs. Shri Sham Sunder Gulati and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on : 19.01.2012 % Date of decision : 30.01.2012 + FAO (OS) No.249. of 2004 SMT. JUGAN K. MEHTA ..... APPELLANT Through : Mr. S.P. Kalra, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Kirti K. Mehta, Advocate. -VERSUS- SHRI SHAM SUNDER GULATI and ORS. ..... RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Sanjeev Sidhwani and Ms. Ekta Kalra, Advocates for respondent Nos.1. to.3. None for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J..1. The appellant filed a suit, being CS (OS) No.736/2002, for partition and rendition of accounts against her siblings / their legal heirs qua the estate of her deceased father late Shri Mangal Sain Gulati. One of the immovable properties forming subject matter of the partition suit is a residential double-storey house with basement constructed on a plot measuring 1300 sq. yds. bearing Municipal No. 6909/31, Bungalow Road, Kamla Nagar, Delhi. The appellant claimed that as per the wishes of her fa...
Comissioner of Income Tax Vs. Mother Dairy India Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :19th December, 2011. % Date of Decision January 30, 2012. + ITA NO.1925/2010 + ITA NO.313/2011 COMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX .... Appellant Through Ms. Rashmi Chopra, sr. standing counsel VERSUS MOTHER DAIRY INDIA LTD. .....Respondent Through Mr. C S Aggarwal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Prakash Kumar, Adv. + ITA NO.310/2011 + ITA NO.319/2011 + ITA NO.312/2011 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Rashmi Chopra, sr. standing counsel versus MOTHER DAIRY FOOD PROCESSING LTD. .... Respondent Through Mr. C.S.Aggarwal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Prakash Kumar, Adv. ITAs 1925/10, 313/11, 310/11, 319/11 and 312/11 Page 1 of 15 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR.1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ?.3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes R.V. EASWAR, J.: These are five appeals filed by the Revenue under...
Dr. Gurcharan Lal Bhatia Vs. Mr. Ramesh Chand Bhatia
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA No.379 /2010 % 30th January, 2012 DR. GURCHARAN LAL BHATIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Parshant Verma, Advocate. versus MR. RAMESH CHAND BHATIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajeshwar Gupta, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL).1. The challenge by means of this Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is to the impugned judgment of the trial Court dated 5.3.2010. The impugned judgment and decree is a final decree in a suit for partition. A preliminary decree was passed way back on 10.3.1997, and , which admittedly became final as the same was never challenged. By the preliminary decree, both the parties being the two brothers were declared as equal co-owners of the suit property being 7/30, Roop Nagar, Delhi, and proceedings were then to take place for partitioning of the suit property by metes and bounds or for RFA...
Poonam Khanna Vs. V P Sharma and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. No.2602/2010 % Judgment reserved on : 06th January, 2012 Judgment delivered on:30th January, 2012 POONAM KHANNA ..... Petitioner Through : Petitioner in person. versus V P SHARMA and ANR .... Respondents Through : Respondent No.1in person. Mr.Navin Sharma, APP for State/R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J..1. Instant petition is being filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. against the impugned order dated 29.07.2010 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, whereby the revision petition of respondent No.1 was allowed and the order dated 23.01.2010 passed by learned Magistrate granting interim maintenance to the tune of ` 5,000/- per month to the petitioner was set aside..2. Being aggrieved, on 24.02.2010, respondent No.1 filed Revision Petition No.19/2010 under Section 397 Cr. P.C. seeking dismissal of interim order of maintenance. The same was disposed of vide impugned order dated 29.07.2010 while setting aside th...
Commisioner of Income Tax Vs. Mohan MeakIn Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA No.964/2009, 967/2009, 1003/2009, 1013/2009, 1014/2009 and 1015/2009 Reserved on : November 24, 2011. % Date of Decision January 30, 2012. COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-I ..Appellant Through Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, Advocate. VERSUS MOHAN MEAKIN LIMITED .....Respondent Through Mr. C.S.Aggarwal, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Prakash Kumar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR.1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.2. To be referred to the Reporters or not Yes.3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes R.V. EASWAR, J.: These are six appeals filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act (Act, for short). We have taken up ITA 964/2009 as the lead matter. In this appeal, the following substantial question of law was admitted on 22nd October, 2009:- ITA Nos.964, 967, 1003, 1013, 1014 and 1015/2009 Page 1 of 16 "Whether ITAT was correct in...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »