Delhi Court January 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds — plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed — log in to pick up where you left off.
iffco Tokio Gen. Ins Co. Ltd Vs. Rooniya Devi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2012
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 30th January, 2012 + MAC. APP. No.189/2011 IFFCO TOKIO GEN. INS CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman, Adv. versus ROONIYA DEVI and ORS. ..... Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J. (ORAL).1. This Appeal is for reduction of compensation for the death of Mangal Sahni, who was aged 47 years at the time of the accident, which took place on 15.08.2010. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) by the impugned award granted a compensation of ` 11,28,104/-..2. The contentions raised on behalf of the Appellant Insurance Company are: - (i) The Tribunal erred in granting 50% increase on minimum wages on the basis of judgment in National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Kailash Devi, 2008 ACC.772. MAC. APP. No.189/2011 Page 1 of 7 (ii) The compensation awarded towards loss of love and affection amounting to ` 1,00,000/- was exorbitant and excessive..3. In Na...
Kishan Pal Singh Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.11925/2009 % Date of Decision: 30.01.2012 Kishan Pal Singh .... Petitioner Through Dr.Ashwani Bhardwaj and Mr.Jintender Choudhary, Advocates. Versus Union of India and Ors. .... Respondents Through Mr.Kapil Wadhwa, Central Govt. Pleader for Mr.Sachin Datta, Central Govt. Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R.MIDHA ANIL KUMAR, J. *.1. The petitioner has sought the quashing of charge sheet dated 11th March, 2006, the inquiry report dated 9th September, 2006, the order dated 6/7th December, 2006 and the orders dated 29th May, 2007 and 5th November, 2007 passed by the respondents removing the petitioner from the service and has also sought directions to the respondents to reinstate the petitioner back in service with all the consequential benefits of pay, arrears of pay-salary and seniority etc. and to treat the suspension period as well as the period from 9th WP(C) No.11925/2009 Page 1 of 26 Sep...
Twinkle Wadhwa Vs. University of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2012
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) NO5163 OF 2010 Reserved on: 17.11.2011 % Pronounced on: 30.01.2012 TWINKLE WADHWA ... PETITIONER Through: Mr. M.R. Shamshad, Advocate with Mr. A.S. Azhad, Advocate. VERSUS UNIVERSITY OF DELHI and ORS. . . . RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. for Respondent No.1/University of Delhi CORAM :- HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW A.K. SIKRI, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE.1. The petitioner herein is a Judicial Officer in Delhi Judicial Service. After successfully undergoing the selection process, she was appointed as Judicial Officer. At that time, she was pursuing her course in Masters of Law (L.L.M). She successfully completed the said course in the year 2009. With a desire to pursue higher education, she applied to the respondent University of Delhi for being enrolled for the Ph.D. Degree Programme on 27th July, 2009. For pursuing this Ph.D course, she had applied to her employer viz High Court of De...
Khaleek Ahmed Vs. Mohd Naved Ansari and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment: 30.01.2012 + CM(M) 291/2011 and CM Nos. 5250/2011 and 6278/2011 KHALEEK AHMED ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Abinash K. Mishra, Adv. versus MOHD NAVED ANSARI and ANR ..... Respondents Through Mr. R.K. Sharma, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J. (Oral).1. Order impugned before this Court is the order dated 07.01.2011 vide which the objections of the defendant to the settlement arrived at between the parties before the Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Court, Delhi on 20.07.2010 had been allowed to be set aside and the objections raised by the defendant that he had been coerced to make this submission before the Mediator had been accepted; necessary corollary was that the parties were held not bound by the mediation proceedings; the matter was fixed for framing of issues..2. Record shows that the present suit is a suit which has been filed by the plaintiff and against the defendant for declarat...
Chemring Countermeasures Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2012
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: 06.01.2012 % Judgment delivered on: 30.01.2012 + WP(C) No. 5700/2011 and CM No. 11637/2011 CHEMRING COUNTERMEASURES LIMITED ...PETITIONER VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ...RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner: Mr.Ravi Shankar Prasad, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Trideep Pais and Mr.Shivan Sharma, Advocates For the Respondent: Mr.Amarjit Singh Chandhiok, ASG with Mr.Himanshu Bajaj, Advocate for respondents 1 to.3. CORAM :- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.1. The present writ petition seeks to challenge the decision of the official respondent, i.e., respondents 1 to 3 to select respondent nos.4. and 5, for supply of expendables, used as counter measures, in defence aircrafts manned and operated by the Indian Air Force (in short IAF). The expendables, go by the technical name of Chaff and Flares. Chaff is an expendable used in an aircraft to deceive...
Rajinder Singh Vs. Dtc and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2012
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) NO. 2744 OF 2011 Reserved on: 18.11.2011 % Pronounced on: 30.01.2012 RAJINDER SINGH ... PETITIONER Through: Mr. Kishore Kumar Patel, Advocate. VERSUS DTC and ORS. . . . RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Saroj Bidawat, Advocate with Mr. J.S. Bhasin and Ms. Rashmi Priya, Advocates for the respondent. CORAM :- HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW A.K. SIKRI, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE.1. The petitioner herein was appointed as Security Guard on 8th November, 1974 with the respondent Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC). The petitioner was promoted as Havaldar on 4th February, 1983 and thereafter got promoted to the post of Assistant Security Inspector (ASI) on 25th June, 1986. In that position he retired on 31 st July, 2009 after attaining the age of superannuation. On 1st September, 2009 he was paid his gratuity and other retiral benefits were released to him on 22 nd September, 2009. However, chargesheet was issued to him on...
Kishan Lal and anr Vs. United India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 24th January, 2012 Pronounced on: 30th January, 2012 + MAC APP. 652/2007 KISHAN LAL and ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Adv. versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. and ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Vidhi Gupta, Adv. for R-2 to R-7. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J..1. The Appellants impugn the judgment dated 12.04.2006 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) whereby while awarding a compensation of ` 6,15,000/- in favour of Respondents No.2 to 7 recovery rights were granted to the first Respondent (United India Insurance Co. Ltd.) on the ground that the second Appellant did not possess a valid and effective driving licence on the date of the accident (i.e. 23.04.2004). The judgment is also challenged on the ground that there was no material produced during the inquiry to reach a conclusion that the Tempo No.HR-38G-8018 was being driven rashly or negli...
Surender Kumar JaIn Vs. State and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2012
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 299/2008 Reserved on: 18.01.2012 Pronounced on: 30.01.2012 SURENDER KUMAR JAIN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashok Bhasin, Senior Advocate with Mr. Uday Gupta, Mr. S.B. Sharma, Mr. M.K. Tripathi, Mr.Sunklan Porwal and Ms.Anuradha, Advocates versus STATE and ANR ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Fizani Hussain, APP with ASI Ram Phal, P.S. Lahori Gate Mr. K.K. Aggarwal and Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J..1. The present petition is preferred under section 482 Cr.P.C. r/w Article 227 of the Constitution assailing the order of the Ld. ASJ dated 19.09.2007 upholding the decision of the Ld. MM dated 12.05.2006 vide which the charge under section 406 IPC was ordered to be framed..2. The brief facts necessitating the present petition are that the complainant on 30.10.1998 lodged a complaint at police station, Lahori Gate alleging that a file of the complainant containing Sales Tax Forms has...
M/S Pradeep Oil Corporation Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2012
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 30th January, 2012 + LPA No. 54/2012 and CM No.s 141618/2012 % M/S PRADEEP OIL CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Mr. V.K. Gupta and Mr. Jayant Nath, Sr. Advs. with Mr. B.C. Pandey and Mr. Udit Gupta, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. R.N. Singh with Mr. A.S. Singh, Advs. CORAM :- HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW JUDGMENT RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J..1. This intra Court appeal impugns the judgment dated 08.11.2011 of a Single Judge of this Court dismissing W.P.(C) No.4694/2011 preferred by the appellant herein. The said writ petition was filed by the appellant to restrain the respondent Railways from carrying out any demolition on and from dispossessing the appellant from premises at 13 KM, Rohtak Road, LPA No. 54/2012 Page 1 of 18 Shakur Basti, Delhi -110 056 and impugning the notice dated 27.12.2010 issued by the respondent Railways to the appellant. The writ petitio...
Sri Sringeri Sharada Institute of Vs. Mr. Shailendra Singh and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2012
.* HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on: 30.01.2012 + CS(OS) No.48/2008 SRI SRINGERI SHARADA INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Ajay Tandon, Adv. with Mr. Ankit Kapoor, Adv. Versus MR. SHAILENDRA SINGH AND OTHERS ..... Defendants Through Defendants already ex parte. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J. (ORAL).1. The above-mentioned suit has been filed by the plaintiff through its Chairman Swami (Dr.) Parthasarathy, seeking permanent injunction restraining the defendants from any kind of demonstration, agitation, blockade or other such acts effecting the ingress or egress of the plaintiff's employees, teachers, staff, students or any other person for and on behalf of the plaintiff inside the campus of the institute of the plaintiff at Plot No.7, Phase-II, Institutional Area, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi..2. It is stated in the plaint that the plaintiff is one of the premier management institutes affiliated to All India Council for Tech...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »