Delhi Court January 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sunil Chaudhary Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.APPEAL No.908/2004 % Judgment reserved on : 14th November, 2011 Judgment delivered on: 19th January, 2012 SUNIL CHAUDHARY ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Manu Sharma, Adv. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Rajdipa Behura,APP with Inspector Surender Singh, police station Old Delhi Railway Station in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J..1. Instant appeal is being filed on behalf of appellant from Jail to assail the impugned judgment dated 26.08.2004 whereby learned Additional Sessions Judge, Special Court under NDPS Act, Delhi held guilty of the offence under Section 20 of the NDPS Act for possessing 9 KGs of charas in contravention of the Act; and vide order on sentence dated 28.08.2004, he was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and fine of ` 1.00Lacs (Rupees One Lac only) under Section 20 (c) of NDPS Act..2. The case of the prosecution in brief is that on 02.04.2003, ASI Asho...
Ex. Head Constable Manjeet Singh Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 12.01.2012 Judgment pronounced on: 19.01.2012 + W.P.(C) 2431/2011 EX. HEAD CONSTABLE MANJEET SINGH ... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA and ORS ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Rajat Malhotra, Mr Sunil Malhotra and Mr Anupam Sharma For Respondent No.1 : Mr Prashant Ghai for Mr Jatan Singh, For Respondent Nos.2. to 4 Ms Sonia Arora CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN V.K. JAIN, J..1. This Writ Petition is directed against the order dated 6.12.2010 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (Principal Bench) (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) whereby it dismissed OA No. 739/1998 filed by Shri Manjeet Singh, petitioner before this Court, and OA No. 1896/1998 filed by one Constable Shri Bhagwan..2. The petitioner and two other police officials were charge-sheeted on the allegations that in the night intervening 21/22.2.1995 they chas...
Dropti Devi and ors Vs. State Nct of Delhi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2012
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. No.2328/2011 % Judgment delivered on: 19th January, 2012 DROPTI DEVI and ORS. ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. Sanjeev Kamra, Adv. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI and ANR. ..... Respondents Through : Ms Rajdipa Behura APP for State with IO SI Surya Prakash. Mr.B.K.Sood, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J. (Oral).1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that FIR No.355 dated 29.6.2009 under Section 420/467/471/120-B Indian Penal Code, 1860 was registered at Police Station Prashant Vihar against the petitioners on the complaint of respondent no.2..2. Learned counsel further submits that respondent no.2 has amicably settled all the issues qua the aforesaid FIR and she is no more interested to pursue the case..3. Respondent No.2 is personally present in Court with her counsel Mr.B.K.Sood. SI Surya Prakash identifies her as respondent Crl.M.C.No.2328/2011 Page 1 of 4 no.2..4. Learned counsel for respondent...
Lyallpur Iron Traders Vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd. and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI F-31 and F-32 (Reportable) + O.M.P. 408/2005 LYALLPUR IRON TRADERS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. A.N. Chaudhary and Mr. B.K. Sharma, Advocates. Versus STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. and ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Advocate. AND O.M.P. 439/2005 STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. A.K. Bajpai, Advocate. Versus LYALLPUR IRON TRADERS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. A.N. Chaudhary and Mr. B.K. Sharma, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER % 19.01.2012.1. Both these petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ('Act') are directed against the impugned Award dated 28th July 2005 of the Arbitral Tribunal ('Tribunal')..2. O.M.P. No.408 of 2005 is filed by M/s Lyallpur Iron Traders, Ghaziabad, U.P., the Claimant before the Tribunal and O.M.P. No.439 of 2005 is filed by Steel Authority of India Ltd. ('SAIL') the Respondent before the Tribunal. In the present judgment M/s Lya...
Delhi State Civil Supplies Corp Vs. Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : 19.01.2012 + FAO(OS) 529/2009, FAO(OS) 531/2009 and FAO(OS) 541/2009 DELHI STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORP LTD ... Appellant Through :Ms.Anju Bhattacharya, Ms.Shifalika Dalmia and Mr.Elgin Matt John, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Ruchir Mishra, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J. (ORAL) We must begin by noticing our anguish at the dispute between the UOI/Respondent and M/s Delhi State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited/Appellant (a State Govt. Undertaking) being dragged to different forums for judicial pronouncements rather being resolved amicably. It is really a question of one pocket or the other of the Government being enriched and it is unfortunate that judicial time is wasted in such disputes. We may also note the strange and unacceptable plea of the appellant that it submitted a tender without proper application of...
The Joint Secretary (Trg) and Vs. N Srikumar and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 12.01.2012 Judgment pronounced on: 19.01.2012 + W.P.(C) 341/2011 THE JOINT SECRETARY (TRG) and CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER Ministry of Defence ... Petitioners versus N SRIKUMAR and ORS ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr R.N. Singh For Respondent No.1 : Mr Santosh Kumar For Respondent No.2. : Mr Naresh Kaushik and Ms Aditi Gupta CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN V.K. JAIN, J..1. This appeal is directed against the order of Central Administrative Tribunal, (Principal Bench) dated 05th March, 2010 passed in OA No. 579/2009, whereby the appointment of respondent No.3. A.Krishnamoorthy as Deputy Director in Armed Forces Film and Photo Division was declared null and void and the official respondents in the OA were directed to constitute a review DPC and consider N. Srikumar, respondent No.1 before this Court (applicant in the OA), for promotion...
Cit Vs. at and T Communication Services
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA No. 526/2011 % Date of Decision : 19th January,2012 CIT ..... Appellant Through Mr. Abhishek Maratha with Ms. Anshul Sharma, Advs. versus AT and T COMMUNICATION SERVICES INDIA PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr. Jayant K. Mehta and Mr. Sukant Vikram, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR.1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ?.3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SANJIV KHANNA, J: (ORAL).1. The Revenue is aggrieved by the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short the Tribunal) dated 19th February, 2010 in ITA No. 2788/Del/2006 deleting the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short the Act). It pertains to the Assessment Year 2000-01. ITA No. 526/2011 Page 1 of 10.2. The Assessing Officer had imposed penalty under the said section on three accounts:- (i) Rs. 1,3...
Satish Kumar Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Others
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2012
1. A third Member Bench has been constituted to resolve the issues on which Hon’ble Members of the Division Bench consisting of Mr. G. George Paracken, Member (J) and Shri Shailendra Pandey, Member (A) differ. The following points have been referred for consideration of the 3rd Member: “(i) whether, keeping in mind the judicial pronouncements on the subject of departmental proceedings, referred to in Paras 3 and 6 of my proposed order, interference by this Tribunal is warranted in the orders of the inquiry officer/disciplinary authority/appellate authority. (ii) whether in the facts and circumstances in OA No.912/2010, the findings/conclusion of the inquiry officer/administrative authorities can be held to be perverse and based on no evidence whatsoever. (iii) whether, in the facts and circumstances of this case, the non-examination of the Doctor as a witness in the departmental inquiry would vitiate the proceedings to such an extent as to warrant his opinion being overlook...
Rajesh Kumar Vs. Govt. of Nct of Deli Through Commissioner of Police, ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2012
ORAL: V.K. Bali, Chairman: 1. Applicant was selected as Constable in the year 2009. Pursuant to show cause notice, his candidature has been cancelled, vide orders dated 07.04.2011 on the ground that he was involved in a criminal case pertaining to FIR No.180/2005 dated 2.8.2005 under Sections 148/149/353/186/342/302/506 IPC, in which he was acquitted, vide orders dated 11.06.2010. 2. We have already held in the matter of Satya Narayan Meena Vs. Union of India and Ors. (OA No.1007/2007 decided on 23.10.2007) that a juvenile dealt with by the Juvenile Justice Board, even if convicted, cannot be denied public employment. Admittedly, applicant was a juvenile at the time of commission of the offence, and as mentioned above, was tried by the Juvenile Justice Board and acquitted. Following the judgment aforesaid, we have decided another case titled Pradeep Hooda Vs. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors. (OA No. 2458/2011 decided on 10.01.2012). While deciding the case aforesaid, we have placed ...
Mrs. Cicilia Minj and Others Vs. Union of India, Through the Secretary ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-19-2012
Shailendra Pandey, Member (A): 1. The applicants, in this OA, are working as Laboratory Technicians and had been directly recruited. They have filed this OA, inter alia, challenging Office Orders dated 15.03.2007 and 30.04.2007, in terms of which the 1st ACP to the post of Lab Technician has been granted in the pay scale of Rs.5000-8000/- and 2nd ACP in the pay scale of Rs.5500-9000/-. Also challenged is order dated 19.06.2007, informing the Association (which had been pursuing the demands of its members including the applicants) that the 1st and 2nd financial upgradations under the ACP Scheme was being granted in accordance with the provisions of OM dated 09.08.1999 and subsequent clarificatory OM dated 10.02.2000 issued by the DoPT, and also the order dated 26.10.2010, issued by Additional Director, CGHS in compliance of the Judgment of this Tribunal in OA 1586/2008. 2. The relief sought in this OA is to quash the aforesaid orders and direct the respondents to grant 1st ACP in the pa...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »