Delhi Court January 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ram Kishore Vs. Jai Singh and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : 20th January, 2012 + RFA(OS) 54/2008 RAM KISHORE ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Munish Tyagi, Advocate. versus JAI SINGH and ORS. ....Respondents Through: Mr.K.N.Popli, Advocate for R-2 to R-4. Mr.Surendra Kumar, Advocate for R-4. Mr.Anil Grover, Advocate and Ms.Divya Jain, Advocate for R-9, R-10, and R-16. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J. (Oral).1. Vide impugned judgment dated May 20, 2008, CS(OS) 375/2001 has been dismissed on two reasons. The first reason is the finding return that the suit seeking partition of land in village Alipur was not maintainable in view of the decision of the Supreme Court reported as 1970 (2) SCC 841 Hatti vs. Sunder Singh. The second reason is that no document was filed nor in the pleading any reference was made to a document of title in the name of the ancestor on whose death partition was prayed for..2. Appellant Ram Kishore so...
PrabIn Kesri and ors Vs. Archeological Survey of India and
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2012
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 20.01.2012 + W.P.(C) 140/2012 PRABIN KESRI AND ORS ... Petitioners versus ARCHEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA AND ORS ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr R. Balasubramaniam For the Respondent No.1 : Mrs Rekha Palli with Mr Himanshu Bajaj For the Respondent No.2 : Mr Naresh Kaushik with Ms Aditi Gupta CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.K. JAIN BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL).1. The present writ petition is concerned with the appointments to the 24 posts of 'Deputy Superintending Archaeologist' at Archaeological Survey of India, which is to be done on the basis of selection. An advertisement was taken out on 10.04.2010, inviting applications for the same. The essential qualifications for the same, inter alia, included:- "Qualifications : Essential : Educational : i) Master's degree in Indian History / Archaeology / Sanskrit / Persian / Prakrit / Pali / Arabic / ...
Sh. Adil Rashid Siddiqui Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: 20.01.2012 + W.P.(C) 393/2012 SH. ADIL RASHID SIDDIQUI ... Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Aaditya V.K. For Respondents : Mr S.M. Arif CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN V.K. JAIN, J. (ORAL).1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 02nd November, 2011, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as "the Tribunal"), dismissing the OA No. 3191/2009, filed by the petitioner. An advertisement was issued by SSC on 26 th November, 1991, to fill up the vacancies of Head Clerks, which had arisen in the year 1991. The interviews were held in the year 1995 and the result was released vide letter dated 02nd May, 1995. The applicant joined All India Radio on 15 th June, 1995. A draft seniority list of Head Clerk/Accountants/Senior Stor...
Constable Bijender Singh Vs. the Commissioner of Police Police Headqua ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2012
Shailendra Pandey, Member (A): 1. The applicant, Bijender Singh, a Constable in the Delhi Police, was departmentally dealt with along with four co-delinquents on the allegation that HC Dhan Raj No.168/W while posted at PS Nangloi made a demand for Ghee on 24.1.1998 on telephone from Shri Ashok Jain, and later intercepted Shri Ashok Jain in the area of PS Nangloi while he was carrying five tins of Ghee in his Maruti car. He was taken to PS Nangloi on the allegation of adulteration of Desi Ghee and detained there. HC Avadh Kishore and the applicant also intercepted Shri Inderjit Singh on 24.1.1998 in the area of PS Nangloi and took him to the police station along with his Maruti van with twelve tins of Desi Ghee on the allegation of adulteration and detained him there. On the same day, SI Sudhir Gulia, HC Dhan Raj, HC Avadh Kishore, Const. Rajesh Kumar and the applicant visited House No.17/311, Sector-3, Rohini, Delhi belonging to Shri Surinder Kumar and illegally conducted search of his...
Om Prakash Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation Through Chairman, Delhi Tra ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2012
Shailendra Pandey, Member (A) 1. In this OA (which has been heard for fresh adjudication on remand from the High Court of Delhi vide order dated 12.07.2011 in Writ Petition (C ) No. 4009/2011), the applicant, a Driver in the Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC), has challenged the order dated 04.07.2008 (Annexure A-1) vide which he was suspended, order dated 23.04.2010 in terms of which the punishment of stoppage of two due increments without cumulative effect for 2 years was imposed on him, order dated 03.08.2010 vide which the Appellate Authority rejected the appeal of the applicant, and order dated 16.12.2010 vide which the Competent Authority (CMD, President Grievance Committee) had rejected the representation of the applicant made on 01.11.2010. 2. The brief facts of the case are that a criminal case FIR No.241/08 dated 18.04.2008 had been registered against the applicant under section 308/34 of IPC in Police Station Najafgarh in which his two sons were also reportedly a party and on...
Ram Kumar Vs. the General Manager, Northern Railway, Baroda House, New ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2012
Mrs. Meera Chhibber, Member (J) 1. Applicant has sought the following relief:- “(i) Direct the respondents to absorb him to the permanent post of driver immediately and continue his seniority from the date of passing the test as skilled Driver/screening, i.e., since 18.4.1981. (ii) Direct the respondent to make the service of the applicant permanent for the post of Khallasi after completion of 360 days of continuous service”. 2. This OA was initially dismissed vide judgment dated 17.5.2000 whereupon the matter was carried to the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi by filing Writ Petition No.7437/2000. The said Writ Petition was disposed of on 15.9.2011 by quashing the order passed by the Tribunal and remitted the matter to the Tribunal for deciding the OA on merits by observing that since the petitioner had not appeared before the Tribunal, the Tribunal presumed the petitioner did not have any further grievance whereas applicant had stated Tribunal had not de...
Ram Hit Vs. Union of India, Through the Secretary M.O.C. and I.T, Depa ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2012
Shailendra Pandey, Member (A): 1. In this OA, the applicant, who was compulsorily retired as a Driver, Grade-I in the Mail Motor Service, New Delhi, has challenged the following orders: Order/notice dated 6.11.2009, for compulsorily retirement under FR 56(j) on attaining the age of 55 years, issued by the Director Postal Services (MB), Delhi Circle, New Delhi. Order dated 07.04.2010, rejecting the representation of the applicant dated 18.01.2010. 2. The brief facts of the case, as gathered from the pleadings, are that the cases of Grade `C’ and `D’ officials of Delhi Circle (including Mail Motor Service, New Delhi), including that of the applicant, who would be completing 55 years of age/30 years of service during the Quarter 01.01.2010 to 31.03.2010 were reviewed, for their retention in service/otherwise under the provisions of FR 56(j) and Rule 48 of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, by the Circle Review Committee of the respondents on 30.09.2009. The applicant was not recommend...
Mandeep Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi, Through the Commissioner of Police, ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2012
Dr. Ramesh Chandra Panda, Member (A) 1. Shri Mandeep Kumar, the applicant herein, desiring to be a Constable in Delhi Police responded to an advertisement issued in 2009 to fill up 6302 vacancies for the post of Constable (Exe.) Male and applied for the said post under OBC category. He was put through Physical Endurance and Measurement Test, Written Test and was declared provisionally selected against Roll No.928371, subject to verification of character and antecedents, medical fitness and final checking of documents etc. He was got medically examined and declared fit. The character and antecedents of the applicant were got verified from the authority concerned which revealed that he was involved in two criminal cases (i) FIR No.137 dated 24.06.2005 under Section 147/148/149/336/341/323/451 of the IPC and (ii) FIR No.235, dated 20.09.2005 under Section 341/323 of the IPC both cases registered at Police Station, Chirawa, Distt. Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. The Trial Court acquitted him vide or...
Ajit Singh Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2012
Shailendra Pandey, Member (A): 1. The applicant, who was working as Casual Labour under the respondent’s-department, has challenged in this OA the action of the respondents in not considering his case for regularization against a Group `D’ post despite his having rendered more than 10 years of service as Casual Labour. 2. It is stated by the applicant that the selection process for appointment against Group `D’ (Casual Labour) was started by the respondents in January, 2000 and, as he fulfilled the eligibility conditions, he also participated in the selection process and, after interview and scrutinizing of documents, he was found fit, and was selected and joined on 10.01.2000, his engagement being treated ‘on casual basis’ only. According to the applicant, he was not given any appointment order. It is stated that after two years of service, the respondents changed the conditions of the engagement of the applicant from daily wager to temporary employee and...
Sandeep Vs. the Commissioner of Police, Police Headquarters, I.P. Esta ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-20-2012
Dr. Ramesh Chandra Panda, Member (A) MA No.3080/2011 1. For the reasons given in the MA, we recall our order dated 20.11.2011 and restore the OA No.4298/2010 to its original number. As the counsel for the parties were prepared for hearing after restoration of the OA, we heard the case finally on 02.01.2012. OA No.4298/2010 2. We may briefly state the factual matrix of the case. During the year 2006, an advertisement to fill up 2134 vacancies for the post of Constable (Exe.) Male in Delhi Police was issued on 28.2.2006/10.3.2006 by giving due reservation to SC/ST/OBC and Ex-Serviceman candidates as per rule. In response to the said advertisement, the applicant herein, applied for the said post against the Application Form No.167917. He qualified in physical endurance and measurement Test and was declared to appear in Written Test and Interview which he appeared and was declared provisionally selected, subject to verification of character and antecedents, medical fitness and final checki...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »