Delhi Court January 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds — plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed — log in to pick up where you left off.
New India Assurance Co. Ltd Vs. Paramjeet Kaur and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: January 30, 2012 Pronounced on: January 31,2012 + MAC. APP. 285/2010 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary, Advocate. Versus PARAMJEET KAUR and ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate for Respondents No.1 to 5 WITH + MAC. APP.104/2012 PARAMJEET KAUR and ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate for Appellants No.1 to 5 Versus NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL MAC. APP. No.285/2010 and MAC. APP.104/2012 Page 1 of 6 JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J..1. These are two Cross-Appeals. In MAC APP No.285/2010, the Appellant New India Assurance Company Ltd.(hereinafter referred to "the insurer") seeks reduction of the compensation of `18,82,000/- awarded for the death of Balwant Singh who succumbed to his injuries on 17.09.2007 suffered in a motor accident which took place on 10.08.2007.....
Vicky Choudhary Vs. State and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2012
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. No.153/2012 % Judgment delivered on: 31st January, 2012 VICKY CHOUDHARY ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Rajat Wadhwa and Mr.Nikhil Mehta, Advs. versus STATE and ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Naveen Sharma, APP for State. Mr.Ankur Sharma, Adv for R-2 with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J. (Oral).1. Vide instant petition, the petitioner has prayed to quash the FIR No.114/2010 dated 13.05.2010 registered under Section 341/307/323/ 427/34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 read with Section 27/25/59 Arms Act at police station Krishna Nagar, Delhi on complaint of respondent No.2..2. Learned counsel for petitioner further submits that qua co- accused namely Mannu @ Mohit Sharma, the matter has already been settled on the statement of the complainant vide order dated Crl.M.C.No.153/2012 Page 1 of 5 29.01.2011 passed by learned Juvenile Justice Board-II, 1, Firozshah Kotla Ground, Delhi Gate, Delhi..3. He...
Federation of Public Schools Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2012
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 31st January, 2012 + WP(C) 636/2012 FEDERATION OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. N.K. Kaul, Sr. Adv. with Mr. P.D. Gupta and Mr. Kamal Gupta, Advs. Versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Purnima Maheshwari, Adv. for GNCTD. Mr. Ashok Agarwal, Adv. as Intervener. AND + WP(C) 40/2012 FEDERATION OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. N.K. Kaul, Sr. Adv. with Mr. P.D. Gupta and Mr. Kamal Gupta, Advs. Versus DIRECTOR (EDUCATION) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Purnima Maheshwari, Adv. for GNCTD. Mr. Ashok Agarwal, Adv. as Intervener. W.P.(C) Nos.636/2012 and 40/2012 Page 1 of 11 CORAM :- HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW A.K. SIKRI, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE.1. W.P.(C) No.636/2012 is preferred on behalf of approximately 326 private unaided recognized schools functioning in Delhi impugning the Notification No.F.15(172)/DE/ACT/2011/7290-7304 dated 27....
Darshana Devi and Usman Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2012
$~A-10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3531/2011 and CRL.M.A. 12530/2011 Judgment delivered on 31.01.2012 DARSHANA DEVI and USMAN ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Mukesh Sharma and Mr.Ksjitij Bhardwaj, Advs. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Satish Mishra, Advocate for Ms.Rajdipa Behura, APP for the State with SI Murari Lal, PS Malviya Nagar Ms. (name not given), Adv. for Mr Samrat Nigam, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J. (Oral).1. On the last date of hearing i.e. on 21.10.2011 following Order was passed:-.1. Ld. Counsel for the applicant submits that an FIR No. 278/2000 U/s 379 Indian Penal Code, 1860 read with Section 39/44 of the Indian Electricity Act at Police Station - Malviya Nagar, New Delhi was registered against the Petitioner. The present FIR was registered against 7 accused persons including the Petitioner..2. Further submits that on committing the theft of Crl.M.C.No.3531/2011 Page 1 of 3 electricity, respondent ...
Uma Solanki and anr Vs. Suresh Chand and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 16th January, 2012 Pronounced on: 31st January, 2012 + MAC.APP. 969/2011 UMA SOLANKI and ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Manish Maini, Adv. versus SURESH CHAND and ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. K.L. Nandwani Adv. with Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J..1. The Appellant impugns the award dated 15.04.2011 passed in a petition filed under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act by the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Tribunal, whereby the Respondent No.1. and 2 (Claimants before the Tribunal) were awarded a compensation of Rs. 5,08,500/- along with interest @ 7.5% for the death of Praveen Solanki (hereinafter referred to as the 'Deceased') who was 23 years old, and was a driver by profession..2. On 26.10.2009 at about 5.45 A.M, the deceased was driving in a car through Ridge Road, opposite gate No.1, Budha Garden, MAC APP 969/2011 Page 1 of 6 Chankyapuri, New Delhi, when he ...
Raj Kumar Gupta and anr Vs. Mohd. Shamshad and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on: 31st January, 2012 + MAC.APP. No.889/2011 RAJ KUMAR GUPTA and ANR. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. M. Shamikh, Adv. versus MOHD. SHAMSHAD and ORS. .... Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J. (ORAL).1. The Appeal is for enhancement of compensation in respect of death of Rahul Gupta, who was aged 23 years and a bachelor at the time of the accident..2. The Tribunal took the deceaseds income as per the income tax return for the assessment year 2008-09 (Financial year 2007-08) as ` 1,16,200/-, applied the multiplier of 14 as per the age of the deceaseds mother and computed the loss of dependency as ` 8,13,400/-. After awarding notional sums under non pecuniary heads overall compensation of ` 8,13,400/- was granted..3. The contention raised on behalf of the Appellants are: - MAC. APP. 889/2011 Page 1 of 6 (i) The deceaseds income should have been considered as ` 1,99,007/- as per the incom...
Shri Amit JaIn Vs. Harvinder Kaur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2012
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Review Petition No.512/2011 in CS(OS) No.314/2011 Date of decision: 30th JANUARY, 2012 SHRI AMIT JAIN ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Anil Kumar Aggarwal, Adv. Versus HARVINDER KAUR ..... Defendant Through Mr. Siddhartha Tanwar, Adv. with Ms. Priyanka Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GITA MITTAL Review Petition No.512/2011 in CS(OS) No.314/2011.1. By this petition, Smt. Harvinder Kaur, the defendant in the present suit, seeks review and recall of the order dated 5th August, 2011. It is necessary to deal with certain essential facts which are necessary for adjudication of the present review petition..2. According to the plaint, Mr. Amit Jain, plaintiff in the present case, entered into an agreement to sell dated 16th October, 2010 with Smt. Harvinder Kaur for purchasing the property bearing new no.IX/1312 Mandir Wali Gali, (Old No.319/13-14, Plot No.45), Gandhi Nagar, Delhi ad measuring 100 sq. yards consisting of a built up ground floor; ...
Ved Prakash and anr Vs. Darshan Singh and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:1st November, 2011 Pronounced on:31st January, 2012 + MAC. APP. 226/2009 VED PRAKASH and ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Mohit Gupta with Ms. Vidhi Gupta, Advocates Versus DARSHAN SINGH and ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate for Respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J..1. The Appellant who is father of deceased Sanjay Kumar impugns a judgment dated 05.12.2008 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Claims Tribunal) by which an application under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act preferred by the Appellant for award of compensation was dismissed. MAC. APP. 226/2009 Page 1 of 4.2. It is alleged that on 15.07.2005, the deceased was driving the tempo bearing registration No.DL-1LD 7050. At about 3:00 AM, when he reached near Hari Petrol Pump, Police Station Vrindawan, Distt, Mathura the tempo collided with an unknown stationary truck. Sanjay Kumar died at ...
Trans Tyres India Pvt. Ltd Vs. Double CoIn Holdings Ltd. and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2012
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on : January 25, 2012 Judgment Pronounced on: January 31, 2012 + FAO(OS) 296-97/2011 TRANS TYRES INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Pratibha M.Singh, Advocate with Mr.Kapil Wadhwa, Advocate and Ms.Ujwalla Jeremiah, Advocate. versus DOUBLE COIN HOLDINGS LTD. and ANR. ....Respondent Through: Mr.Akhil Sibal, Advocate with Ms.Seema Sundd, Ms.Shikha Bhardwaj and Ms.Ritika Ahuja, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J..1. CS(OS) No.89/2011 has been registered on a plaint filed by Double Coin Holding Ltd. and ZAFCO Trading LCC as co-plaintiffs against Trans Tyres (India) Pvt. Ltd. and its Director Mr.Harish Kakkar; the two impleaded as defendants No.1 and 2 respectively; and surprisingly in spite of defendant No.1 being described as a private limited company, Mr.Harish Kakkar has been described as its proprietor. During arguments in the appeal the p...
Krishan Kumar Karnani Vs. M/S Reliance Industries Ltd. and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-31-2012
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % RESERVED ON: JANUARY 23 , 2012 PRONOUNCED ON: JANUARY 31, 2012 + RFA(OS) No.28/2004 KRISHAN KUMAR KARNANI ........Appellant Through: Mr.Sanjay Jain, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Ankur Mittal, Ms.Prabhsahay Kaur, Mr.Pranav Kumar, Advocates. versus M/S RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD. and ANR......Respondents Through: Mr.B.B.Sahney, Sr.Advocate with Mr.R.Chandra Chand, Mr.Sunil Kumar, Advocates for respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI PRATIBHA RANI, J..1. The appellant Krishan Kumar Karnani has challenged the judgment and decree dated 28.09.2004 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court exercising power under Order XXXVII Rule 6(3) CPC. The impugned order dated 28.09.2004 reveals that vide an earlier order dated 25.03.2003, leave to defend was granted to the appellant RFA(OS). Nos.28/2004 Page 1 of 14 herein (defendant No.2 in the suit), subject to the condition that he would deposit a sum of Rupee...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »