Delhi Court September 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Turn browsing into brief-ready notes
Open any judgment and get a structured AI Brief in seconds - plus Semantic Search when you need to hunt by meaning, not keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shiv Raj Singh Vs. Commissioner of Police
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2011
Justice V. K. Bali, Chairman: 1. The applicant, a constable in Delhi Police, was selected as temporary constable (exe.) during the recruitment held in the year 1998. At the time of submitting the application form for the post of constable, the applicant had mentioned his date of birth as 22.10.1979. He passed the high school examination from Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad Board of High School and Intermediate Education, U.P., in the year 1996, and produced the educational certificate showing his date of birth as 22.10.1979, whereas his actual date of birth was 22.10.1977. A complaint came to be received by the respondents that the applicant was enlisted in Delhi Police by showing his date of birth as 22.10.1979 instead of 22.10.1977 fraudulently and dishonestly. An enquiry was got conducted by Deputy Commissioner of Police, East District, Delhi, whereupon it came to be revealed that the applicant had passed class 9th from Janta Inter College, Babri, Muzaffar Nagar in the year 1991. The enq...
Abhay Singh Vs. Commissioner of Police, Delhi, New Delhi and Others
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2011
Justice V. K. Bali, Chairman: 1. Abhay Singh, a constable in Delhi Police, the applicant herein, has filed this Original Application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking quashing of adverse entries made in his service records, and in consequence of setting aside the said entries, he be promoted with all financial benefits. 2. Brief facts as projected in the Application reveal that the applicant was appointed as a constable in Delhi Police w.e.f. 15th March, 1988. On 11th December, 2009 he made an application for test list A for constable examination, which was returned to him due to having C-grade of ACR for the year 2006-07. The applicant made an application for obtaining copy of the said ACR. On 14th April, 2009 he was informed that the period for appeal against adverse ACR is within thirty days from the date of receiving such ACR. Constrained under the circumstances, the applicant issued a legal notice to the department which was responded by the respo...
Jitendra Kumar and Others Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi Through the Chief ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2011
Dr. A.K. Mishra, Member (A) 1. The applicants have challenged the validity of the selection procedure adopted by the Respondent No.3 for appointment of candidates to the post of Nursing Orderly/Safai Karamcharis. Their prayer is to set aside the entire selection process including the final select list and the advertisement pursuant to which the selection was made and direct the respondents to make a fair selection afresh in accordance with rules. 2. The applicants were candidates for the posts of Nursing Orderly/Safai Karamchari which were advertised during June/July, 2008 by the respondents. At the time of hearing earlier the grounds canvassed by the learned counsel for the applicants have been summarized in our order dated 29.08.2011, which is extracted below:- “Applicants have challenged the validity of the selection for the posts of Safai Karamchari as well as Nursing Orderly in terms of Advertisement dated June/July 2008 (page-17) on the following grounds: i) In the Recruitm...
R.D. Raju Vs. Union of India Through the General Manager, Mumbai Cst a ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2011
Dr. A.K. Mishra, Member (A) 1. The applicant has challenged the order dated 01.01.2009 of Additional Divisional Railway manager, Central Railway, Nagpur final Appellate Authority by which the penalty of removal from service was modified to that of reduction from the Grade Rs.5000-8000 to the Grade Rs. 3050-RSRP and his pay was fixed at Rs. 3050/- for a period of eight years with further direction that on restoration after expiry of said period the penalty would have effect on the seniority and future increments of the applicant. The intervening period from actual date of removal from service in terms of Sr. DCM’s order dated 17.12.2007 till resumption of duty in terms of this order was directed to be treated as dies non. The applicant has also challenged the order of removal passed by Senior Divisional Commercial Manager, Central Railway, Nagpur passed originally on appeal on 17.12.2007 and the original penalty order dated 26.09.2007 of the Disciplinary Authority (DA) of reductio...
Ram Karan Pathak Vs. Delhi Development Authority Through Its Vice-chai ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2011
Dr. A.K. Mishra, Member (A) 1. The prayer of the applicant in the present O.A. is to set aside the order dated 21.07.2009 passed by the Appellate Authority (AA) by which the penalty of “removal from service” imposed on him by order dated 03.06.2008 of the Disciplinary Authority (DA) was upheld. 2. A major penalty charge sheet was issued against the applicant on 15.07.2002 on the allegation that while working as Reader to the Estate Officer, he demanded and accepted Rs. 5000/- as bribe money from one complainant Mr. Vijay Kumar Diwan ostensibly for reducing demurrage charges on unauthorized encroachment made in front of his house at Kalkaji. He was caught red handed by officers of Anti Corruption Bureau and arrested in connection with FIR No.2/2001 u/s 7/13 Prevention of Corruption Act. A criminal case which was started against him ended in conviction on 31.01.2008. His criminal appeal No. 155/2008 before the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi has been admitted and the senten...
Ajay Shrotiya Vs. Delhi Development Authority Through Its Vice-chairma ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2011
Dr. A.K. Mishra, Member (A) 1. The applicant, who was proceeded against by his Disciplinary Authority (DA) on the allegations that during his tenure as Junior Engineer (Civil) in the Building Department/West Zone/MCD where he was working on deputation from Delhi Development Authority (DDA), he did not take action to book unauthorized construction u/s 343/344, initiate action for sealing the property under Section 345-A or for further prosecution u/s 332/461/complaint u/s 466-A of DMC Act. He has challenged the penalty order dated 17.02.2009 of the DA and the order dated 16.11.2006 of the AA and the Memorandum dated 16.11.2006 with a prayer to set aside these orders and issue a direction to the respondents to give him all consequential benefits. 2. The applicant was working as Junior Engineer (Civil) in the Building Department/West Zone/MCD on deputation from DDA and was in-charge of Ward No. 45 from 06.05.2002 to 09.11.2002. Following the direction of the Hon’ble High court of De...
G. S. Rathore Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-2011
1. The O.A. by the applicant was filed at Jabalpur Bench of the Tribunal, which came to be transferred to the Circuit Bench at Bilaspur, as it would appear that the applicant may have prayed for the same because of his posting near to Bilaspur. The applicant has now been transferred to Jaipur, and through present application filed by him under Section 25 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeks transfer of his OA to Jaipur Bench. 2. Pursuant to notice, the respondents have appeared and filed reply. All that is mentioned in the reply contesting the prayer of the applicant is that the applicant cannot keep on asking for transferring the case wherever he may be transferred. The respondents may not be right. In Madhya Pradesh, whereas the main seat of the Bench is at Jabalpur, there are Circuit Benches at Bilaspur, Indore and Gwalior. If at the request of the applicant, the matter may have been heard at Bilaspur, it cannot be said to be an intra-Tribunal transfer. If the applicant ...
M/S Spread Info Tech Consultants Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/S Zte Kangxun Telecom ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-29-2011
1. By this application under Order 7 Rule 11 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC for short) defendants have prayed that the plaint be rejected. 2. Plaintiff has filed this suit against the defendants for recovery of `3,66,85,008/- together with pendente lite and future interest @ 15% per annum. 3. Briefly stated, facts of the case as averred in the plaint and relevant for the purpose of disposal of this application are that plaintiff entered into a Cooperation Agreement dated 12th August, 2004 with the defendants; Agreement was executed on 14th August, 2004. In terms of the Agreement, plaintiff was required to make all necessary arrangements and various other activities with the customers mainly Atlas Interactive India (Pvt.) Ltd. (for short AIIPL) for successful bid for the defendants' project. Defendants had agreed to pay a total 7% of FOB price towards fee of the plaintiff for the said work. Initially, it was agreed that the defendant No. 2 will pay to th...
Devender Kumar Vs. Govt of Nct of Delhi and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-29-2011
1. After conducting departmental enquiry, the disciplinary authority by order dated 1st June, 2007 directed that the five years' approved service of the petitioner herein, Devender Kumar, be forfeited permanently with immediate effect entailing reduction in his pay from Rs. 4220/- P.M. to Rs. 3795/- P.M. It was also directed that the suspension period from 13th September, 2006 to 19th October, 2006 should be treated as 'not spent on duty'. The Appellate Authority by order dated 9th May, 2008 reduced the punishment to that of forfeiture of three years' approved service, permanently entailing a reduction of pay from 4220/- P.M. to Rs.3965/- P.M. The treatment of the suspension period was upheld. 2. The petitioner, Constable in Delhi Police, challenged the enquiry proceedings and the punishment in O.A.No.1796/2009, which has been dismissed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench (tribunal, for short) by the order dated 17th May, 2010. 3. This writ petition has been filed a...
Delhi Development Authority Vs. Suresh Gupta and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-29-2011
1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 221 days in preferring the appeal. 2. Before issuing notice on the application for condonation of delay, we have thought it apt to examine the matter on merits. 3. Contention of the appellant-Delhi Development Authority (DDA) is that the respondent Nos.1 and 2 should be asked to pay land rates prevalent in 2006. It is submitted that the learned single Judge in the impugned order dated 10th January, 2011 has erred in holding that the land rate prevalent as on 1st January, 1993 should be applied. It is submitted that the initial allotment by the appellant-DDA to one K.D. Sikand vide perpetual sub-lease deed dated 28th December, 1987 was illegal. 4. Plot No.E-1091, Government School Teacher CHBS was allotted to K.D. Sikand vide perpetual sub-lease deed dated 28th December, 1987. She transferred her rights in the plot vide General Power of Attorney (GPA)/Agreement to Sell dated 18th March 1988 in favour of Anil Kumar/ Sarla Devi/ Sadhan...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »