Delhi Court September 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors. Vs. Ex. Constable Sudesh Pal Rana
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2011
1. The petitioners, Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors., have challenged the order dated 5th March, 2010 passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi in OA No.1689/2009 titled as „Ex. Constable Sudesh Pal Rana v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors., allowing the original application of the respondent and setting aside the order of dismissal dated 9th August, 2006 dismissing the respondent from the service, after dispensing with the enquiry under Article 311 (2)(b) of the Constitution of India and also setting aside the order of the Appellate Authority dated 5th June, 2008 upholding the punishment. The Tribunal also directed the petitioners to reinstate the respondent in service on deemed suspension with arrears from the date of dismissal till the reinstatement. The petitioners were held to be not precluded from proceeding further against the respondent in accordance with law. 2. The respondent was appointed as a Constable in Delhi Police and during his service ...
Ex.Const.Krishan Kumar Vs. Uoi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2011
1. For the security of Sh.S.S.Libra, Member of Parliament, a Central Industrial Security Force Outpost was established outside his residence at village Libra in Punjab. 14 Force personnel were deputed under the command of SI Sanat Hasda. He was the senior-most officer. The other members of the Unit were HC Amar Singh, HC Gurnam Singh, HC Parmatma Rai, Ct.Tej Singh, Ct.Parvez Ahmed, Ct.Krishan Kumar, Ct.Desai Kiran, Ct.Santosh Kumar, Ct.Shish Ram, Ct.Shahabad Khan, Ct.Ram Sarup, Ct.Sapan Singh and Ct.Lakhbir Kumar. 2. On 3.3.2010 SI Sanat Hasda, Ct.Sapan Singh and Ct.Shahbad Khan accompanied Shri S.S.Libra to New Delhi for his personal security and SI Sanat Hasda claimed to have received information on his mobile phone from HC Amar Singh that an AK-47 rifle bearing Butt No.151 issued in the name of the petitioner was missing from the Outpost and that he gave orders to conduct an extensive search to locate the rifle which could not be found in spite of intensive search and thus the matte...
G.S.Saluja Vs. State and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-16-2011
1. The petitioners, who are husband and wife are aggrieved by 2 different orders where-under taking cognizance of complaints filed by the 2nd respondent in both petitions, the 2 have been summoned. 2. The complaint in question pertains to stated offences committed by the petitioners as also alleged co-accused, Punita Saluja, relating to Sections 467/467/477A/420 IPC read with Section 109/120-B/34 IPC. 3. The complaint in question appears to be a fall out of certain documents produced by the accused in another FIR registered at the instance of the 2nd respondent who alleged that Ms.Punita Saluja had developed intimacy with him and enticed him to hand over signed blank cheques and that the other co-accused, who are her relations, used the same to siphoned off `1.15 crores from his account. In said FIR, accused produced an agreement as also 3 letters under cover of which the cheques were statedly issued by the complainant. 4. As per the complainant in question the agreement relied upon a...
intercraft Ltd. Vs. M/S. Capital Boot House and Other
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-15-2011
1. A suit for declaration and permanent injunction was filed by M/s Inter Craft Limited against M/s Capital Boot House and three others viz. S.Indrave Singh Mann, S.Shivender Pal Singh Mann & S.Brijender Pal Singh Mann, seeking a declaration that it is a lawful tenant of the defendants in respect of shop No. B-24 Connaught Place, New Delhi and is entitled to remain in its possession. A permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering in possession of the plaintiff qua the aforesaid shop was also sought. The defendants in the suit filed Written Statement contesting the suit and also filed a Counter Claim against the plaintiff. It was alleged in the Written Statement that shop in question was taken on rent by M/s Capital Boot House and other defendants were its partners. It was alleged that plaintiff had obtained forcible unauthorized occupation of the suit premises on 3rd October, 1994. The suit became infructuous since the suit premises was vacated by the plaintiff ...
Wg.Cdr. A.K.Aggarwal (Retd.) Vs. Uoi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-15-2011
1. Having lost the battle before the Armed Forces Tribunal when WP(C) No.2967/1999 filed by the petitioner; re- numbered as TA No.549/2009, was dismissed by the Tribunal vide impugned order dated 14.1.2010, petitioner tried his luck before the Supreme Court by directly seeking Leave to Appeal vide SLP(C) No.12067/2010 in which after show-cause notice was issued, leave was declined vide order dated 12.11.2010. 2. Since notice had been issued in the Petition seeking Special Leave to Appeal and counter affidavit was filed, petitioner relied upon certain documents in the pleadings before the Supreme Court and filed RP No.2325/2010 seeking review of order dated 12.11.2010. The Review Petition was dismissed on 18.1.2011. 3. Thereafter, instant writ petition has been filed on 12.9.2011 challenging the order dated 14.1.2010 passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal. 4. Being conscious of the fact that dismissal of a Petition seeking Special Leave to Appeal would not be a bar for the maintainability ...
Gtl Limited and Others Vs. Ifci Limited and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-15-2011
1. Urgent matter is received at 4.00 p.m. 2. The three plaintiffs, namely, GTL Limited, Chennai Network Infrastructure Limited and GTL Infrastructure Limited, have filed the present suit for declaration and permanent injunction against the defendants, namely, IFCI Limited and IFCI Financial Services Limited, seeking the following prayers:- "a) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to declare that the said Notice dated 8th September, 2011 sent by defendant No.1 to plaintiff No.1 and 2 being contrary to and in violation of the provisions specified in Annex 4 of the CDR Master Circulate dated 1st July, 2011 issued by the Reserve Bank of India, Inter-Creditor Agreement, the Debtor Creditor Agreement and the same be declared as illegal, null and void; b) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to pass a decree for permanent injunction against defendant No.1 restraining it from and selling the Pledged Shares during the operation of standstill as per the provisions of the CDR Master Circular dated 1st July, 20...
Subhash and Others Vs. Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-15-2011
1. This intra-Court appeal has been filed by the appellants, who are 24 in number and are represented by a trade union. The appellants have assailed the order dated 2nd June, 2010 passed by the learned single Judge allowing Writ Petition (Civil) Nos. 8594/2004 and 8616/2004, which were filed by the respondent herein-Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital. By the impugned decision two awards both dated 4nd February, 2004 in ID No. 93/1996 and ID No. 143/1996 have been set aside. By award dated 4th February, 2004 in ID No. 93/1996, the Industrial Adjudicator had held that the applicants, who were 26 in number, were direct employees of the respondent and the contract between the respondent and M/s Lakshmi Chand and Sons was sham and a camouflage. It was further directed that these employees should be regularised against the vacancies, which had arisen after termination of services of the appellants and the balance/rest of the employees should be regularised as and when vacancy arise. ID No. 143/1996 w...
Ram Kumar Vs. Uoi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-15-2011
1. The Petitioner herein had preferred O.A. No.299/1997 before the Central Administrative Tribunal claiming the relief to the effect that he be absorbed as permanent employee for the post of Driver with effect from 18.04.1981 and his seniority be also given on that basis. The O.A. has been dismissed by the Tribunal vide impugned Order dated 17.05.2000. The Tribunal has taken note of the facts that the Petitioner was initially appointed as Khalasi on casual basis and he himself had offered for regularization for the said post on 26.02.1996 on the basis of which regularization was accorded to him vide orders dated 26.02.1996. The Tribunal further observed that the Petitioner had been given the grade of Driver i.e. `1,200-1,800/- on ad hoc basis in the construction organization which is a project office and he is still holding the post and has not been demoted. The contention of the Respondent to the effect that the Petitioner was having lien in Class IV post in Delhi Division was noted b...
Vijay Singh Vs. Ram Bhaj Verma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-15-2011
This petition under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter called 'the Act') has been filed by the petitioner-tenant against the order dated 06.01.2011 passed by the Rent Controller whereby his application for leave to contest the eviction petition filed by his landlord against him under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act to have the possession of shop no.8 in house no. A-2/1, Ground Floor, Hastal Road, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi-110059(hereinafter to be referred as the 'tenanted shop') has been dismissed and he has been ordered to vacate the tenanted shop. 2. The respondent-landlord had filed the eviction petition on the ground that he and his son were doing no work and so he, his son and his married daughter, who was having litigation with her husband and who was also living with him, had planned to start a joint business and to open a sweets shop in the tenanted shop. He was having no other space except the tenanted shop in occupation of the petitioner-tenant for star...
S.R.V. Print Pack Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-15-2011
1. Notice. Mr. Anand, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the Respondent. 2. Since both the parties are ready to argue the matter finally, we have heard the arguments and proceed to dictate the order. 3. This Appeal is filed against the Order dated 18th March, 2011 passed by the learned Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as „the CESTAT) on the stay application filed by the Appellant in the Appeal which is still pending before the CESTAT. Vide impugned Order, the Appellant is directed to deposit 60% of the amount demanded within a period of eight weeks while waiving the amount of interest and penalty demanded by the Adjudicating Authority. 4. We may record that CESTAT has passed the impugned Order along with two other Appeals on identical facts on the same date i.e. 18th March, 2011. Orders were passed by the CESTAT directing those appellants as well to deposit 60% of the demanded amount. 5. In the instant case, the CESTAT has simply foll...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »