Delhi Court August 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India and ors. Vs. Ravinder Singh and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-25-2011
1. Respondent No. 1, Ravinder Singh was appointed in the Junior Time Scale in the Central Water Engineering (Grade 'A') service on 25th November, 1972. Director/Superintending Engineer in March, 1992 and to the grade of Chief Engineer [Sr. Administrative grade level post (Grade A) Service] on 6th February, 1998 and continued in the said capacity till 31st March, 2010, when he retired on superannuation. While holding the post of Chief Engineer, his case was considered for promotion to the higher administrative grade level post by the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC, for short) on 31st July, 2007, 1st April, 2008 and 9th February, 2009, but he was not granted promotion as on each occasion. He was assessed unfit for promotion. The reason it appears was his grading in the Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs, for short) for the period 2003-04, 2004-05 and 2005-06, which were below the bench mark. 2. The respondent No. 1, approached the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, D...
Habsons Jobsup Ltd Vs. Union of India and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-25-2011
1. The petitioner had earlier preferred W.P. (C) 5074/2011 challenging the order dated 24th / 28th June, 2011 suspending for a period of 30 days, the Registration Certificate, issued to the petitioner under the Emigration Act, 1983, permitting the petitioner to recruit workers for overseas employment. 2. The aforesaid writ petition came up before this Court on 20 th July, 2011 when Ld. ASG appearing on advance notice stated that the suspension for 30 days was coming to an end on 27th July, 2011 and that under Section 14(2) of the Act the certificate could be suspended for a period of not exceeding 30 days without any show cause notice; it was further contended that the notices given to the petitioner were to show cause against cancellation of Registration Certificate and not to show cause against extension of suspension and thus the fears expressed by the petitioner of extension of suspension were misplaced. 3. On the contention of the counsel for the petitioner on 20th July, 2011 in t...
K.K.Pilania and ors. Vs. State and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-24-2011
1. This is a petition filed by the petitioners under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.52/2006, under Section 406/420 IPC registered by P.S. Preet Vihar, Delhi. 2. The petitioner nos.1 and 2 and the complainant one Hari Mohan Bansal, were the Directors of a company by the name of HMD Technology Ltd. There were some disputes, regarding management and the financial issues, between the complainant and the petitioners. This resulted in registration of the aforesaid FIR. Subsequent thereto, the petitioners (Second party) and the complainant (First party) have arrived at a settlement on 21.2.2007. In terms of the said amicable and peaceful settlement, all the past, present disputes /litigation were agreed to be settled on the following terms and conditions:- "1) That the second party agrees to pay to the first party (First party is the complainant and the Second party is the petitioners) an amount of `30,00,000/- (Rupees Thirty Lacs) in favour of M/s HMD Technologies Ltd., in full a...
U.P. State Road Tansport Corpn. Vs. Jyotsana Yadav and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-24-2011
1. This appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act,1988 seeks to impugn the judgment and award of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Delhi dated 8th July, 2003 whereby the learned Tribunal awarded a sum of ` 39,86,064/- (Rupees Thirty Nine Lakh Eighty Six Thousand and Sixty Four Only) to the respondents No.1 to 4 with interest thereon at the rate of 12% per annum. 2. The facts pertinent for the decision of the present appeal may be briefly delineated as follows. 3. On 28.05.1999, one Shri Sanjay Kumar Yadav, at about 5.45 p.m., was commuting in his Maruti car No.UP-15F-8501 on the Delhi-Meerut road when a bus belonging to the U.P. State Road Transport Corporation, bearing No.UHN-2624 (hereinafter referred to as "the offending bus") came from the opposite direction at a very fast speed, driven in a rash and negligent manner by the respondent No.5, and hit against the car of the deceased head-on causing fatal injuries to the deceased. As a result of the aforesaid impact of the ...
Varghese B. Vs. Director General (Bsf)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-24-2011
1. On 7.8.2006 ASI Anant Kumar Singh, husband of Gunjan Singh, lodged a written complaint alleging that the petitioner had acted inappropriately with his wife during his i.e. ASI Anant Kumar Singh's absence in the house. 2. Taking cognizance of the report and treating the same as an offence report and hearing the petitioner with respect thereto, the Commandant of the battalion to which the petitioner was attached opined that Record of Evidence be prepared and for which he framed a charge against the petitioner. Record of Evidence was prepared and placed before the Commandant, who after considering the same, opined that the petitioner requires to be tried at a Petty Security Force Court. Formal charge was drawn indicting the petitioner of having used force with intent to outrage the modesty of Mrs.Gunjan Singh at 11:25 hrs. on 7.8.2006; the place being quarter No.43, BSF Campus, Dobasipara, Tura, Meghalaya. It was alleged that the act of the petitioner was an offence punishable under Se...
Ashok Kumar Vs. Joginder @ Joggi and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-24-2011
Crl. M.A. 9454/2011 (U/S 5 of Limitation Act) in Crl.L.P.389/2011 This is an application for condonation of delay in filing criminal leave petition. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay is condoned and the application is allowed. CRL.A. 499/2011 & Crl.L.P.389/2011 1. The informant/complainant has preferred an appeal under Section 372, Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment and order of the Learned Sessions Judge, dated 25th January, 2011 in SC No.161/2008 acquitting the respondents of the charge framed against them, for having committed offences punishable under Sections 302/34 IPC. 2. Briefly, the prosecution story is that on 27.08.2008, at about 08:50 PM., near House No. 272, Gali No.7, Rao Nihal Singh Marg, Kapashera, both the respondents,in furtherance of their common intention inflicted gun-shot injury on Sunita Yadav, wife of Late Sh. Ravinder Yadav, with the intention to kill her. The injured Sunita Yadav died later; both the respondents were accused...
Dr. Tajinder Pal Singh Vs. University of Delhi and anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-24-2011
1. The petition has been filed claiming the following reliefs: "A) Direct the Respondents, by an appropriate writ, order or direction, to include the name of the petitioner in the electoral roll of DUTA for the session 2011-2013 after completing the formalities of submission of fee for membership of DUTA for the session 2011-2013. B) Direct the Respondents, by an appropriate writ, order or direction to allow the petitioner to contest the election for the post of DUTA Executive for the session 2011-2013 after giving fresh time for filing the nomination papers. (C) Direct the Respondents, by an appropriate writ, order or direction for postponing the DUTA election scheduled to be held on 25.08.2011, from 25.08.2011 to any other suitable date by giving a fair opportunity to the petitioner for contesting the DUTA election for the session 2011-2013. 2. The petitioner has, as respondents to the petition, impleaded only the Delhi University and Bhim Rao Ambedkar College of the University of D...
Balbir Singh @ Kalu Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-24-2011
1. This is a petition for grant of regular bail filed by the petitioner, Balbir Singh @ Kalu, in respect of FIR No.259/2010, registered under section 302/34 IPC at P.S. Sarai Rohilla, in respect of which the trial is pending before the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the prosecution case are that on receipt of DD No.2A, dated 26.07.2010, the IO reached Jeevan Mala Hospital, Delhi, where doctors had declared one Mr.Narender, s/o Late Sh.Satyanarayan, R/o B-1448, Shastri Nagar, Delhi, aged about 36 years having been brought dead with a history of multiple punctured wounds over chest and upper limbs. On the basis of the statement of one Anil, brother of the deceased, accused Balbir Singh @ Kalu, s/o Sh.Harjeet Singh, R/o B-1331, Shastri Nagar, Delhi was arrested and FIR No.259/2010 was registered for an offence under section 302 IPC by PS Shastri Nagar, Delhi. The pocker allegedly used as the weapon of offence, was also recovered, near Udham Sin...
Darshna Devi Vs. D.D.A. and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-24-2011
1. The petition impugns the order dated 30th June, 2011 of the respondent DDA made in pursuance to the direction contained in the order dated 13th July, 2010 of this Court in W.P.(C) No.9577/2009 earlier preferred by the petitioner. 2. The petitioner claims to be a resident of Village Nangal Dewat, land wherein was acquired for the purposes of development of Airport. During the pendency of the writ petition being W.P.(C) No.481/1982 challenging the said acquisition, a proposal was mooted for rehabilitation of the persons displaced owing to acquisition and the challenge to the acquisition was given up. Subsequently, several applications came to be filed in the said disposed of W.P.(C) No.481/1982 and which applications were disposed of vide order dated 18th May, 2005 issuing certain directions qua allotment of alternative land. 3. The petitioner claims to be the legal heir of one Sh. Sheonath whose name was entered as holder of land in the said village. The petitioner is the widow of on...
Dr. Shikha Aggarwal Vs. Union of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-24-2011
1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks quashing of the counseling procedure adopted by the respondent no.2 in DNB CET in terms of the guidelines laid down by the respondent No.2- Board. The petitioner also seeks directions to direct the respondent No.2 to allow the petitioner to participate in the second round of counseling which is now scheduled from 25.8.2011 to 29.8.2011. 2. Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the counseling procedure laid down by the respondent No.2 in the prospectus is not at parity with the procedure laid down for admission in PG medical courses in AIIMS and the counseling process laid down by All India Entrance Examination for admission to PG Medical and Dental courses. Counsel also submits that the petitioner had duly qualified the DNB-CET and, therefore, was eligible to participate in the counseling process to seek admission in the DNB programme in the stream and college/institute/hospital o...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »