Delhi Court December 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sh. S.K. Tandon Vs. Export Inspection Council of
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: 12.7.2011 Judgment delivered on: 19.12.2011 + WP(C) No. 1986/2010 Sh. S.K. Tandon ......Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person. Vs. Export Inspection Council of India and Anr. ......Respondents Through: Mr. L.R. Khatana, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Michael Dias with Mr. Siddharth Dias, Advocates for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR KAILASH GAMBHIR, J..1. By this petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 26.02.2010 to the extent of his place of posting at Kochi Head Office (Kerala). The petitioner further seeks directions to direct respondents to post him at Delhi in terms of the Govt. of India instructions notified through OM No. 14017/41/90-Estt.(RR) dated 15.02.1991. WP(C) 1986/2010 Page 1 of 11.2. Brief facts of the case relevant for deciding the present petition are that the petitioner joined the respondent organization in 1976 as ...
Lal Chand Public Charitable Trust Vs. Delhi Wakf Board and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2011
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment: 19.12.2011 + CM(M) No.2166/2006 LAL CHAND PUBLIC CHARITABLE TRUST ...........Petitioner Through: Mr.Arvind Nigam Sr. Advocate with Ms.Mandeep Kaur, Advocate. Versus DELHI WAKF BOARD and ORS. ..........Respondents Through: Mr.Sanjeev Sindhwani, Advocate for R-1. Mr.Arjun Harkauli, Advocate for R-2. Mr.Umesh Aggarwal, Advocate for R-6. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J. (Oral).1. Order impugned is the order dated 18.8.2006 which is the order of the appellate court endorsing the finding of the trial court dated 23.9.2004 wherein the application filed by the applicant namely Lal Chand Public Charitable Trust under Order XXII Rule 10 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure had been dismissed. These are two concurrent findings by the two courts below. CM(M)No.2166/2006 Page 1 of 7.2. At the outset, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondent that this court is sitting in its pow...
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd Vs. Sarvesh and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2011
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 8th December, 2011 Pronounced on: 19th December, 2011 + MAC.APP. 342/2009 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through Ms. Manjusha Wadhwa, Advocate Ms. Angana Goswami, Advocate versus SARVESH and ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Varun Kumar, Advocate for Respondents No.1 and 4(widow and daughter) Mr. R.K. Bachchan, Advocate for Respondents No.2 and 3 AND + MAC.APP. 358/2009 RAM PAL SINGH and ANR. ..... Appellants Through Mr. R.K. Bachchan, Advocate versus ROSHAN LAL and ORS. ..... Respondents Through Ms. Manjusha Wadhwa, Advocate with Ms. Angana Goswami, Advocate for R-3 Insurance Company. Mr. Varun Kumar, Advocate for Respondents No.4 and 5(widow and daughter) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL MAC APP 342/2009 and 358/2009 Page 1 of 7 JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J..1. These are two cross Appeals arising out of the award dated 19.03.2009 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Tribunal) whereby a compensation of ...
Vikas Pareek Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2011
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on 19.12.2011 + LPA No. 71/2010 VIKAS PAREEK ... Appellant versus UNION OF INDIA and ORS. .. Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Ms Aishwarya Bhati, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr S.B. Upadhayay, Sr. Adv. with Mr Pawan Upadhayay, Adv. for R-2 Mr V.K. Rao, Sr. Adv. with Mr Ayushya Kumar, Adv. for R-3 to.10. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL BADAR DURREZ AHMED (ORAL).1. This appeal is directed against the judgment delivered by a learned single Judge of this court in W.P.(C) No. 6555/2007 on 19.08.2009. By virtue of the impugned judgment the petitioner's writ petition was dismissed. The petitioner was aggrieved by the fact that although he had applied for the post of Executive Trainee-XIII Batch (IT) in pursuant of an advertisement issued by the respondent No.2 dated 28.02.2007, he was not selected despite the fact that he secured more marks in the ag...
Jaffar Abbas Vs. Mohan and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2011
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:7th December, 2011 Pronounced on:19th December, 2011 + FAO 274/1999 JAFFAR ABBAS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. H. R. Khan Suhel, Adv. with Mr. Ankit Mishra and Mr. Anchit Upadhayay, Neeraj Singh, Advocates. Versus MOHAN and ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Kanwal Chaudhary, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J..1. The Appellant Jaffar Abbas, who was working as a Constable in Delhi Police seeks enhancement of compensation in respect of the injuries suffered by him in a motor accident, which took place on 11.06.1981. The Appellant was getting a salary of ` 489.56 paise per month. His left leg was amputated and he suffered 40% disability in relation to his left lower limb. He claimed a compensation of ` 5,00,000/-. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Tribunal) awarded a compensation of ` 80,000/-, which is tabulated hereunder: - FAO 274/1999 Page 1 of 9 Sl. Head of Compensation Compensation No. gran...
Meenakshi Mishra and ors Vs. Tarsem Singh and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2011
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 12th December, 2011 Pronounced on: 19th December, 2011 + MAC APP. 110/2007 MEENAKSHI MISHRA and ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. M.L. Lahoty Advocate with Mr. Paban K. Sharma, Advocate Mr. Yogesh Kumar Jagia, Advocate. Mr. Amit Sood, Advocate. Versus TARSEM SINGH and ORS. ...... Respondents Through: Ms. Rekha Sharma Proxy Counsel for Mr. Anil Aggarwal Advocate for Respondents No.1 and.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL JUDGMENT G. P. MITTAL, J..1. The Appellants who were the widow and two minor sons of the deceased Prafull Chandra Mishra seek enhancement of compensation in respect of award dated 22.11.2006 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (the Tribunal) whereby a compensation of ` 63,85,940/- was awarded..2. The deceased Prafull Chandra Mishra was working as Director (Technical) with M/s. Frito Lay India, a Group of Companies of M/s. Pepsico. He was getting a salary of ` 18,34,391/-. MAC APP 110/2007 Page 1 of 1...
The Oriental Insurance Company Vs. M/S Ganpati Cargo Movers
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2011
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Pronounced on: 19.12.2011 + CS(OS) No. 738/2009 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND ANR...... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Santosh Tiwari, Adv. for Mr. Ram N. Sharma, Adv. versus M/S GANPATI CARGO MOVERS ..... Defendant Through: None CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J. (ORAL).1. This is a suit for recovery of Rs.47,16,327/-. The plaintiff no.1 is an Insurance Company, whereas, plaintiff no.2 is a company registered under Companies Act. The plaintiff no.2 imported 5 refrigeration chillers from M/s Carriers China Ltd., China. The consignment containing two Chillers bearing nos. 64133 and 64135 after custom clearance was delivered to the defendant for carriage from ISD, Tuglakabad to job site at DLF Building-8, Phase-II, Gurgaon. The plaintiff no.2, later CS(OS)No. 738/2009 Page 1 of 10 learnt that the truck/trailor, in which the Chillers were loaded, while negotiating a u-turn at an intersection at Pul Prahladpur, Badarpur, D...
M/S. Brushman India Ltd. and anr Vs. Standard Chartered Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2011
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl.M.C. 151/2010 Date of Order: 19.12.2011 M/S. BRUSHMAN INDIA LTD. and ANR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Ch.Ranjit Singh, Advocate. versus STANDARD CHARTERED BANK ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sumit Bansal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.L. MEHTA M.L. MEHTA, J. (Oral).1. This is a petition under Section 482 CrPC assailing the order dated 11.11.2009 of the learned M.M., Dwarka Courts whereby the application under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short, the Act) filed on behalf of the complainant/respondent Standard Chartered Bank seeking condonation of delay in filing the complaint was allowed. The petition has been filed assailing the said order mainly on the ground that delay of 45 days in filing the complaint was not explained by the complainant and that being so, the Magistrate was not justified in condoning the delay vide the impugned order..2. The admitted facts of the case are that the petitioner had taken an over...
Shriram Pistons and Rings Ltd Vs. Basant Khatri
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2011
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA No.568/2011 % 19th December, 2011 SHRIRAM PISTONS and RINGS LTD ..... Appellant Through : Mr. T.K.Ganju, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Mr. Aditya Ganju and Mr. Sukant Vikram, Advs. versus BASANT KHATRI ..... Respondent Through : CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J (ORAL).1. The challenge by means of this Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is to the impugned judgment of the Trial Court dated 8.11.2011 decreeing the suit for possession and mesne profits filed by the respondent/landlord..2. The facts of the case are that the appellant/defendant/lessee vide a lease deed dated 3.8.2005 took on lease the premises being E-35, Third RFA No.568/2011 Page 1 of 16 Floor, Himalaya House, 23, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi-110001 admeasuring 994 sqr. ft. from the then owner/landlord-Mrs. Usha Lall. This lease deed was for a perio...
Delhi Music Society Vs. Director General of Income Tax
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2011
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C)No. 4726/2011 Reserved on : 24th November, 2011. % Date of Decision : 16th December, 2011. DELHI MUSIC SOCIETY .... Petitioner Through: Mr.Ramesh Singh with Mrs. Megha Mukherjee, Advocates. VERSUS DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INCOME TAX .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anupam Tripathi, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR.1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.2. To be referred to the Reporters or not Yes.3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? Yes R.V. EASWAR, J.: The petitioner is the Delhi Music Society which was registered as a Society in 1953 under the Societies Registration Act, 1860. It was established with the following aims and objects:- WP(C)No.4726/2011 Page 1 of 18 (a) To teach, promote and encourage all forms of Music and Dancing, Western, Indian or any other. (b) To establish and run Schools and Colleges of Music and Dancing or to assist suc...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »