Delhi Court December 2011 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2011 Page 2 of about 191 results (0.020 seconds)The Commissioner of Income Vs. Shri Vardhman Overseas Ltd
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA NO.774/2009 Reserved on : 24th November, 2011 % Date of Decision : 23rd December, 2011 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III ......Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Advocate. VERSUS SHRI VARDHMAN OVERSEAS LTD. .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR.1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ?.3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? R.V. EASWAR, J.: By order dated 10.10.2009 the following substantial question of law was formulated and admitted by a Division Bench of this Court:- Whether the Ld. ITAT erred in deleting addition under Section 41(1) of Rs.1,25,46,534/- on account of non- genuine creditors? ITA No.774/2009 Page 1 of 31.2. The brief facts giving rise to the present appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, (`the Act' for short) may be noticed. ...
Tag this Judgment!Aitreya Limited Vs. Dans Energy Pvt Ltd and ors
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 819/2011 and and I.A. 19638/2011 (for vacation of interim stay) AITREYA LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayyar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Mr. Abhishek Kale, Mr. Harshvardhan, Mr. Thomas P. Kuruvilla and Mr. Arnav Kumar, Advocates. versus DANS ENERGY PVT LTD and ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Kanika Agnihotri, Advocate for R1 and R3. Mr. Sitesh Mukherjee and Mr. Parinay Deep Shah, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT 23.12.2011.1. The Petitioner, Aitreya Limited, a limited company incorporated under the laws of the British Virgin Island, has filed this petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ('Act') seeking interim reliefs against Respondent No.1. Dans Energy Private Limited ('DEPL'), Respondent No.2. Energy Innovations Limited, Dubai, UAE ('EIL') and Respondent No.3. Mr. T. Nagendra Rao. The Investment Agreement.2. Under an I...
Tag this Judgment!M/S.Gursharan Singh Vs. M/S.Bharat Petroleum Corpn. Ltd and
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + IA No.9364/1991, I.A 9046/2010 and CS(OS) No.3768A/1991 % Date of Decision: 23.12.2011 M/s.Gursharan Singh .... Petitioner Through Mr.B.K.Dewan and Mr. Bhavesh Kumar Sharma, Advocates. Versus M/s.Bharat Petroleum Corpn. Ltd and ors. .... Respondents Through Mr.Manoj Singh, Advocate, Mr. Anil K. Batra and Mr. Prince Kumar, Advocates for Respondent no.1/Objector CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR ANIL KUMAR, J. *.1. The petitioner was awarded work for construction of road at LPG plant at Lucknow and an agreement dated 12th January, 1988 was executed between the parties. The work was to be completed within four months and the stipulated date of completion was 14th June, 1988, however, the work was completed on 21st June, 1988. The value of the work awarded to the petitioner was Rs.13,64,400/-, however, the scope of work was increased and work could be completed by the petitioner by 25th November, 1988..2. In respect of work, construction of r...
Tag this Judgment!M/S. Jagdish Prasad and Company Vs. United India Insurance Co.Ltd
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: 19.5.2011 Judgment delivered on: 23.12.2011 + RFA No. 127/2005 M/s. Jagdish Prasad and Company ......Appellant. Through: Mrs. Mala Goel, Adv. Vs. United India Insurance Co.Ltd. ......Respondent Through: Mr.Vineet Malhotra, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR KAILASH GAMBHIR, J..1. By this appeal filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the appellant seeks to set aside the judgment and decree dated 30.10.2004, passed by the learned ADJ, Delhi, whereby the suit filed by the appellant against the respondent for recovery of Rs 5,30,000/- alongwith interest @ 18% and costs was dismissed. RFA No. 127/2005 Page 1 of 17.2. The brief facts as set out in the present appeal are that the appellant is a registered partnership firm carrying on the business of iron and steel merchants including the business of importing iron and steel products from various places like Europe, South Korea, Australia and...
Tag this Judgment!Sh.Tejveer Singh Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WP(C) No.9090/2011 % Date of Decision: 23.12.2011 Sh.Tejveer Singh .... Petitioner Through Mr.Saumyen Das, Advocate. Versus Union of India and Ors. .... Respondents Through Ms.S.Fatima, Advocate for Ms.Anajana Gosian, Advocate for the respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P.MITTAL ANIL KUMAR, J. *.1. The petitioner has sought direction to the respondents to re- consider the case of the petitioner to join the Indian Air Force and to treat the petitioner as if he had joined the service of the respondents in the December,1983 for the purposes of salary and other benefits and to pay to the petitioner salary and other benefits which would have accrued to the petitioner had he been permitted to join the Indian Air Force in December, 1983. The petitioner has also sought WP(C) No.9090/2011 Page 1 of 9 grant of compensation for mental harassment and for spoiling his carrier..2. The petitioner contended that the respo...
Tag this Judgment!Bhim Singh and ors Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4337/2011 % Judgment delivered on: 23rd December, 2011 BHIM SINGH and ORS ..... Petitioner Through : Mr. S.K. Sethi, Adv. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J. (Oral) 1 Notice issued.2. Ms. Rajdipa Behura, learned APP for State accepts notice on behalf of state.3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the instant petition has been filed jointly by accused persons and complainant to quash the FIR No. 994/2000 dated 31.10.2000 registered at P.S. Dabri District South West under Sections 147/148/149/452/323/34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 against petitioners Nos.1. to 10 on the complaint of petitioners No.11 and.12.4. Learned counsels further submit that all the petitioners belong Crl.M.C. 4337/2011 Page 1 of 3 hail from the same locality and the matter has been compromised amicably between the parties due to the intervention of family friends and...
Tag this Judgment!Jai Rattan Bhalla and anr Vs. Puri Investments and ors
Court: Delhi
.* HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI + IA No.16165/2010, IA No.2159/2011, IA No.3346/2011 and IA No.2824/2011 in CS (OS) No.2424/2010 % Judgment decided on : 23.12.2011 Jai Rattan Bhalla and Anr. ......Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Abhinav Vasisht, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajat Navet, Adv. Versus Puri Investments and Ors. .....Defendants Through: Mr. P.V. Kapur, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jeevesh Nagrath, Ms. Anjali Verma and Ms. Ikasha Bhalla, Advs. Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J..1. By this order I shall dispose of IA No.16165/2010 (O 39 R 1 and 2 CPC) filed by plaintiffs, IA No.2159/2011 (O 39 R 1 and 2 CPC) filed by plaintiffs, IA No.3346/2011 (O 12 R 6 CPC) filed by plaintiffs and IA No.2824/2011 (O 39 R 4 CPC) filed by filed by defendant Nos.1, 2, 5 and.6..2. The brief factual matrix of the matter is that the plaintiffs have filed the suit for injunction, rendition of account, partition and CS (OS) No.2424/2010 Page 1 of 74 declaration praying for the following reliefs: (a)...
Tag this Judgment!Director of Income Tax Vs. Ericsson A.B.,new Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 504/2007, ITA 507/2007 ITA 508/2007,ITA 511/2007 ITA 397/2007 JUDGMENT RESERVED ON:22.7.2011 JUDGMENT DELIVERED ON:23.12.2011 (1) ITA 504/2007 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ..... APPELLANT Through: Mr. Mohan Prasaran, ASG with Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel Versus ERICSSON A.B.,NEW DELHI. ....RESPONDENT Through: Mr. Soli Dastur, Mr. Percy Perdiwalla, Ms. Pratibha Singh, Mr. Sudeep Chatterjee and Ms. Meghna Sudha Panda, Advocates (2) ITA 507/2007 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ..... APPELLANT Through: Mr. Mohan Prasaran, ASG with Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel Versus ERICSSON RADIO SYSTEM A.B.,NEW DELHI. .RESPONDENT Through: Mr. Soli Dastur, Mr. Percy Perdiwalla, Ms. Pratibha Singh, ITA 504/2007, ITA 507/2007, ITA 508/2007,ITA 511/2007, ITA 397/2007 Page 1 of 75 Mr. Sudeep Chatterjee and Ms. Meghna Sudha Panda, Advocates (3) ITA 508/2007 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ..... APPELLANT Through: Mr. Mohan Prasaran, ASG with Mr. Sanjeev Sab...
Tag this Judgment!Shishti Solkar and ors Vs. Mahavir Sr.Model School and ors
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: 14.9.2011 Judgment delivered on: 23.12.2011 W.P.(C) No. 1659/2011 SHISHTI SOLKAR and ORS. ......Petitioners Through: Mr. U.M. Tripathi, Adv. Vs. MAHAVIR SR.MODEL SCHOOL and ORS. ......Respondents Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Khanna, Sr. Advocate With Ms. Seema Rao, Adv. for respondents 1 and 2 Ms. Koplin Kaur proxy counsel for DOE. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR KAILASH GAMBHIR, J..1. The petitioner no.1 who is a student of 10th standard and the petitioner no.2, the father of the petitioner no.1 have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to seek directions to direct the respondent no.1/Mahavir Senior Model School and W.P.(C) No. 1659/2011 Page 1 of 20 the respondent no.2, the Manager of the said school to issue admit card of the petitioner no.1 for appearing in the Board Examination of 10th class commencing from 15th March, 2011. The petitioners also seek directi...
Tag this Judgment!Aman Gaur Vs. State
Court: Delhi
HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI + Bail Application No.700/2011 Date of Decision: 23.12.2011 AMAN GAUR ... Petitioner Through: Mr.S.S.Babbar, Advocate Versus STATE ...Respondents Through: Mr.Navin Sharma, APP for the State. Mr.Siddharth Luthra, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Gaurav Gaur, Adv. for the Complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI V.K. SHALI, J..1. This is an application, filed under section 439 Cr.P.C. read with section 482 Cr.P.C., for grant of regular bail by the accused, Aman Gaur. Bail Application No.700/2011 Page 1 of 36.2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that an FIR No.30/2010, under section 302/307/34/147/ 148/323/325 IPC read with section 25/27 of the Arms Act was registered at P.S. Dabri, New Delhi, on the statement of one Vivek Gaur, s/o Sh.Virender Kumar Sharma, R/o C-25, New Krishna Park, Vikas Puri. He had stated that he, along with his family, has been residing at the above- mentioned address and is running a factory of manufacturing scooter parts at Khasr...
Tag this Judgment!