Delhi Court December 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mira Kulkarni Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2011
$~8. *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 199/2010 MIRA KULKARNI ..... Appellant Through Mr. Bharat Beriwal, Advocate. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Sr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR ORDER % 16.12.2011 CM No. 9755/2011 This is an application for placing on record additional documents. The appellant wants to place on record two pages of the brochure of Neemrana Hotels Private Limited. We are not inclined to accept the prayer made in the application for several reasons. This alleged brochure is taken out by Neemrana Hotels Private Limited and what is stated therein has not been verified by the Revenue. There was correspondence between the Assessing Officer and Neemrana Hotels Private Limited, which has been referred to in our order below. In case the appellant wanted to rely upon the said document, he should have filed it before the Assessing Officer and the...
Wg. Cdr. A.K. Aggarwal (Retd.) Vs. Air Force Bal Bharati School and or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2011
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 16th December, 2011 + LPA 892/2011 % WG. CDR. A.K. AGGARWAL (RETD.) .... Appellant Through: Mr. Avijit Bhattacharjee, Adv. Versus AIR FORCE BAL BHARATI SCHOOL and ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Rekha Palli and Ms. Punam Singh, Advs. for R-1. Mr. Sachin Datta and Mr. Abhimanyu Kumar, Advs. for R-2. Mr. Navratan Chaudhary, Adv. for R-3. CORAM :- HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW.1. Whether reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.2. To be referred to the reporter or not?.3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J..1. The appeal impugns the order dated 26.09.2011 of the learned Single Judge dismissing W.P.(C) 8297/2009 preferred by the appellant with LPA 892/2011 Page 1 of 9 costs of `20,000/- to be deposited with the Delhi High Court Bar Association Lawyers Social Security and Welfare Fund..2. The writ petition was filed by the ...
M/S Godrej Sara Lee Ltd Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2011
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + REV. PET.396. OF 2008 In W.P.(C) 17267 OF 2006 % Judgment Reserved on:29.09.2011 Judgment delivered on: 16.12.2011 M/S GODREJ SARA LEE LTD. ...PETITIONER Through: Mr. A.N. Haskar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajeev M.Roy, Mr. Ashish Kothari, Advocates. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA and ORS. ... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sumit Pushkarana, Advocate for R-1 to R-4 Mr. Akhil Sibal, Advocate with Mr. Pradeep Chhindra, Mr. Amit Aggarwal, Advocates for R.5 CORAM : HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL A.K. SIKRI,ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE:.1. The review petitioner had filed the aforesaid writ petition No.17267/2006 raising various grievances on the basis of which few reliefs were prayed for. Some of the demands of the petitioner were accepted by the respondent no.1 on the basis of which interim orders were passed and the same was incorporated REV. PET.396. OF 2008 In W.P.(C) 17267 OF 2006 Page 1 of 13 in the final judgment rendered on 11th A...
Vijay Lama Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2011
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 16.12.2011 + CRL.A. No. 886/2010 VIJAY LAMA ......Appellant -versus- STATE ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case:- For the Appellant : Ms Nandita Rao, Advocate For the Respondent : Ms Richa Kapoor, APP. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MS JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL VEENA BIRBAL, J.1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 25th March, 2010 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi arising out of FIR No.298/05 PS DBG Road whereby the appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable u/s 302 IPC. The appeal is also directed against the order of sentence dated 26th March, 2010 wherein appellant has been sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and a fine of ` 2000/- has been imposed upon him. Crl.A. No.886/2010 Page 1 of 24.2. The case of the prosecution is as under:- On 9th August, 2010 at about 10.30 pm, Head Constable Puran Singh, PW-20 who was posted at P.S DBG Road ...
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/S Expeditors International
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-16-2011
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On: 26.09.2011 % Judgment Pronounced On: 16.12.2011 + ITA 1088 OF 2011 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ...APPELLANT Through: Mr. N.P. Sahni, Advocate VERSUS M/S EXPEDITORS INTERNATIONAL (INDIA) PVT. LTD. ...RESPONDENT Through: Ms. Shashi M. Kapila, Mr. Sushil Kumar, Mr. Pravesh Sharma, Advs. CORAM :- HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL A.K. SIKRI, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE: The respondent-assessee, which is a private limited company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, is into the business of supplying chain management, logistics and freight forwarding that is related to movement of goods and cargo within India or outside by road, rail, air or ship. This involves activities of packing, loading/unloading, trucking, tenderization, customs clearance and other cargo handling functions at both ITA No.1088 of 2011 Page 1 of 5 ends, besides moving the goods by air or sea, where goods cross the inter...
Rewati Raman Singh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-15-2011
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. No. 3556/2011 % Judgment reserved on: 16th November, 2011 Judgment delivered on: 15th December, 2011 REWATI RAMAN SINGH ..... Petitioner Through : Mr.Mukul Rohatgi and Mr.Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Advocates with Mr.Arunabh Chowdhry, Mr.Amit Sharma, Mr.Altaf Mansoor, Mr.Raktha Gogoi, Mr.Vaibhav Tomar and Mr.Gainilung Panmei, Advocates for the petitioner. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Mohan Parsaran, ASG with Mr.Pawan Sharma, Standing Counsel (Crl) with Ms.Laxmi Chauhan and Mr.Harsh Prabhakar, Advs. DCP Ashok Chand and ACP Rajinder Bakshi, Crime Branch in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J..1. The instant petition being filed to challenge the order dated 14.10.2011 passed by ld. Special Judge (ACB) Delhi whereby the said judge is of the opinion that the petitioner was a part of the criminal conspiracy punishable under Section 120B IPC. Accordingly, by the said impugned order the ld. Judge summoned ...
Ashok Kumar Singh Alias Bablu and ors Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-15-2011
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4068/2011 % Judgment delivered on:15th December, 2011 ASHOK KUMAR SINGH ALIAS BABLU and ORS ......Petitioner Through : Mr. Chakravarti, Adv. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Navin Sharma, APP. Mr. Lalit Kumar, Adv. for R-2 to.4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J. (Oral) CRL. M.C. 4068/2011 1 Notice issued.2. Mr. Navin Sharma, learned APP accepts notice on behalf of State.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide FIR No.925. dated 25.09.2007, a case under Sections 308/323/34 Indian Penal Crl.M.C. 4068/2011 Page 1 of 4 Code, 1860 was registered against the petitioners at P.S. Sangam Vihar, Delhi on the complaint of respondent No..2. Respondent no.3. sustained injuries during scuffle.4. Learned counsel further submits that vide settlement deed dated 29.11.2011, all the disputes amongst the parties have been amicably settled.5. Respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4 are personally present in the court ...
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Alankar Radio Equipments
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-15-2011
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 926/2007 % Date of Decision : 15th December, 2011 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through Mr. N.P. Sahni, Advocate versus ALANKAR RADIO EQUIPMENTS ..... Respondent Through Mr. Satyen Sethi and Mr. Arta Trana Panda, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR.1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.2. To be referred to the Reporters or not ?.3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? SANJIV KHANNA,J: (ORAL) The present appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (The Act in short) impugns the order dated 10.08.2006 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (`The Tribunal' for short) in the case of Alankar Radio Equipments. The order pertains to the Block ITA No.926/2007 Page 1 of 8 Assessment period 01.04.1988 to 24.09.1998..2. The respondent is a partnership firm of father and son and is primarily engaged in carrying on busines...
Mohd.Rafiq and ors Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-15-2011
$~66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV. P. No.564/2011 % Judgment delivered on: 15th December, 2011 MOHD.RAFIQ and ORS. ......Petitioner Through : Mr. Kuldip Singh and Mr. Harpreet Singh, Advocates versus STATE ..... Respondent Through : Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP with Inspector J.S. Mehta, PS Khazuri Khas. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J. (Oral) CRL.M.A. No.19416/2011 (exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CRL.REV.P. 564/2011.1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner No.5. got married with Shama (now deceased) on 9th September, 2009 according to the Muslim rites and ceremonies. Crl.Rev. P.564 /2011 Page 1 of 10.2. Learned counsel further submits that the said marriage was preceded by love affairs between the two. After marriage both the parties had been staying in a rented accommodation and there was no intervention from the side of either party to the life of the decea...
M/S National Highways Authority Vs. M/S Prakash Atlanta Jv and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-15-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 339/2004 Reserved on: November 29, 2011 Decision on: December 15, 2011 M/S NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Chetan Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vikas Goel and Ms. Pooja Sharma, Advocates. versus M/S PRAKASH ATLANTA JV AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kanika Singh, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT 15.12.2011.1. The issue involved in the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ('Act') has been summarised in an order dated 16th November 2007 passed by this Court, the relevant portion of which reads as under:- "This is a petition whereby the National Highway Authority of India has challenged the award dated 26.06.2004 passed by an Arbitral Tribunal comprising of three Arbitrators. The work that was assigned to the respondent by the petitioner was for the construction of a segment of the Lucknow Bypass con...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »