Delhi Court December 2011 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2011 Page 1 of about 191 results (0.020 seconds)State Bank of India Vs. M/S. Shyam Garments and ors
Court: Delhi
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on : 15.12.2011 % Judgment delivered on : 23.12.2011 + WP(C) 1657/2011 M/S. SHYAM GARMENTS and ORS. .... PETITONERS Vs STATE BANK OF INDIA ... RESPONDENT AND + WP(C) 431/2011 STATE BANK OF INDIA ...PETITIONER Vs M/S. SHYAM GARMENTS and ORS. ...RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner: Mr. Sangram Patnaik, Mr. Anupam Siddhartha and Ms. Renu Narula, Advocates in WP(C) 1657/2011 and Mr R.P. Vats and Ms Reema, Advocates in WP(C) 431/2011. For the Respondent: Mr. R.P.Vats and Ms. Reema, Advocates in WP(C) 1657/2011 and Mr. Sangram Patnaik, Mr. Anupam Siddhartha and Ms. Renu Narula, Advocates in WP(C) 431/2011. CORAM :- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J WP(C) 1657/2011 and WP(C) 431/2011 Page 1 of 35.1. The captioned writs have been preferred against the judgment dated 21.09.2010, passed by the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Delhi (hereinafter referre...
Tag this Judgment!Indian Farmers Fertiliser Vs. M/S. Duggal Constructions
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 12.12.2011 % Date of decision : 23.12.2011 + FAO (OS) No.294 of 2001 INDIAN FARMERS FERTILISER COOPERATIVE LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ravinder Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manoj Verma, Mr. Motish Kumar Singh, Advocates and Mr. D.S.S.R. Murty, Authorised Representative. Versus M/s. DUGGAL CONSTRUCTIONS (INDIA) LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. B.B. Sawhney, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate. + FAO (OS) No.374 of 2001 M/s. DUGGAL CONSTRUCTIONS (INDIA) LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. B.B. Sawhney, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate. Versus INDIAN FARMERS FERTILISER COOPERATIVE LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ravinder Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manoj Verma, Mr. Motish Kumar Singh, Advocates and Mr. D.S.S.R. Murty, Authorised Representative. _______________________________________________________________________________________________________ FAO (OS) No.294 of 2001 and FAO (OS) No.374. of 2001 Page 1 ...
Tag this Judgment!Cit Vs. Hotline Electronics Ltd
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA NO.1073/2011 Reserved on : December 20th 2011 % Date of Decision : December 23rd, 2011 + ITA 1073/2011 CIT ..... Appellant Through : Mr. N.P. Sahni, Sr. standing counsel versus HOTLINE ELECTRONICS LTD .... Respondent Through : Mr. Mayank Bugani and Mr.Saurabh Mishra, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR.1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?.3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? R.V. EASWAR, J.: In this appeal by the revenue filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act, for short), the order of the Income Tax ITA No.1073/2011 Page 1 of 9 Appellate Tribunal (The Tribunal, for short) dated 28.01.2011 in ITA No.2635/Delhi of 2010 (assessment year 2005-06) is challenged..2. The respondent assessee is a limited company engaged in the business of manufacturing and trading in television sets....
Tag this Judgment!Union of India Vs. M/S Honda Siel Car India Limited
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Writ Petition (Civil) No. 2731/2003 Reserved on: 8th November, 2011 % Date of Decision: 23rd December, 2011 Union of India ...Petitioner Through Mr. Mohan Prasaran, ASG with Mr. S.K. Dubey and Mr. Vivek Pipersenia, Advocates. Versus M/s Honda Siel Car India Limited ...Respondent Through Mr. V. Lakshmi Kumaran, Mr. L. Badri Narayanan and Mr. Krishna Rao, Advocates. + Writ Petition (Civil) No. 11831/2005 Union of India ...Petitioner Through Mr. Mohan Prasaran, ASG with Mr. S.K. Dubey and Mr. Vivek Pipersenia, Advocates. Versus M/s Honda Siel Car India Limited ...Respondent Through Mr. V. Lakshmi Kumaran, Mr. L. Badri Narayanan and Mr. Krishna Rao, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR.1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.2. To be referred to the Reporter or not ?.3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest WPC 2731/2003 and 11831/2005 Page 1 of 37 SAN...
Tag this Judgment!State of Nct of Delhi Vs. Farukh and ors
Court: Delhi
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DECIDED ON: 23.12.2011 + CRL.L.P. 475/2011 CRL.M.A.12078/2011 STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC. versus FARUKH and ORS. ..... Respondents Through: None. CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % The State seeks leave to appeal against a judgment and order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge dated 28.03.2011 whereby the respondents/accused were acquitted for the offences punishable under Section-302/147/148/149/307, IPC..2. It is alleged that the police was informed at 10:58 PM on 5.4.1995 through PCR intimation about an incident in Muslim colony Crl.L.P.475/2011 Page 1 Chatterpur by which several people were injured. The concerned SHO reached the spot; the intimation was handed over to PW-11 SI Dharamvir who proceeded to the place of incident in the street opposite Farukh's shop. It was stated that the police were unable to find any eye...
Tag this Judgment!New Delhi Municipal Council Vs. Usha Gangaria and ors
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 23rd December, 2011 + W.P.(C) NO. 13647/2009 NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL .....Petitioner Versus USHA GANGARIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Along with W.P.(C) NO.13648/2009 NDMC v. MOHD. AHSAN and ORS. W.P.(C) NO.13649/2009 NDMC v. PANKAJ PANDEY and ORS. W.P.(C) NO.13650/2009 NDMC v. SANJAY BABU GUPTA and ORS. AND W.P.(C) NO. 13390/2009 NDMC v. SODAN SINGH and ORS. Present: Ms. Madhu Tewatia with Ms. Sidhi Arora, Advocates for petitioner in all Mr. Anup G. Chaudhary, Sr. Advocate with Mr. N.K. Sahoo, Adv for R-1 in all Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Adv. for DMRC in all Mr. Najmi Waziri, Adv. for GNCTD in all W.P.(C) Nos. 13647 to 13650 and 13390 all of 2009 Page 1 of 19 CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW JUDGEMENT RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J..1. The five petitions question the power of the Vending Committee and the Appellate Authority constituted, initially under the directions of the Supreme Court, as noticed in Sodan Singh vs. N...
Tag this Judgment!For the Vs. Nair, Mr Varun Singh and Mr Anuj
Court: Delhi
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: 01.12.2011 % Judgment delivered on: 23.12.2011 + WP(C) 6066/2011 SCHILLER HEALTHCARE INDIA PVT. LTD. and ANR. ...... PETITONERS Vs UNION OF INDIA and ORS. ..... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners: Mr S. Ganesh, Sr. Advocate with Ms Surekha Raman, Mr Gaurav Nair, Mr Varun Singh and Mr Anuj Sarma, Advocates. For the Respondents: Mr Jatan Singh, CGSC with Mr Prashant Ghai, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1. and.2. Mr C.N. Sreekumar and Mr R.R. Chandran, Advocates for Respondent No..3. CORAM :- HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.1. The grievance of the petitioner is in a narrow compass. The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that, the Global Tender Enquiry Document dated 07.07.2010 (hereinafter referred to as the Tender), which had technical specifications stipulated therein, inter alia, in respect of products described in Schedule 10, 13 and 47...
Tag this Judgment!In the Matter of Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6814/2011 Reserved on: 09.12.2011 Date of decision 23.12.2011 IN THE MATTER OF NEERAJ BAHL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Karan Singh Thukral, Advocate versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mukul Talwar, Advocate CORAM HON'BLE MS.JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HIMA KOHLI, J..1. The present petition is filed by the petitioner praying inter alia for issuance of directions to the respondent/University to conduct the three theory examinations again, for which he was restrained from appearing and further to declare his results for those Second Semester examinations which he had undertaken, along with the other students, for the course of B.Tech (M.Tech dual) Degree..2. The facts of the case lie in a narrow compass. Respondent/University had admitted the petitioner as a student in the B.Tech course (M.Tech dual degree) for the academic year 2010-11. On completion of his first semester, he was promoted to the secon...
Tag this Judgment!P M Kariappa Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 3890/2010 and Crl.M.A. 18577/2010 (stay) % Reserved on: 2nd December, 2011 Decided on: 23rd December, 2011 P M KARIAPPA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. N. Hariharan, Mr. Amit, Mr. Vaibhav Sharma, Advs. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP for State. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA.1. A complaint was filed by the District Excise Officer on 5th December, 1995 on which case FIR No. 492/1995 was registered at PS IP Estate, Delhi. The allegations in the complaint are that M/s Karam Chand Thapar and Brothers (C.S.) Ltd., Distillery Division, Unnao (UP) had applied for renewal of L-1 License in the NCT of Delhi in respect of two brands of whisky namely Bonds Street Whisky and Lord Jin Whisky and one brand of Marco Polo XXX Rum which were being manufactured at their distillery. According to the complaint the sales figure of the IMFL brands for the years 1993-94 and 1994-95 produced by the attorney of the firm showe...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. Abdul Malik and anr Vs. Shashi Bhalla
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment: 23.12.2011 + RC.Rev. No. 536/2011 SH. ABDUL MALIK and ANR ...........Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Advocate. Versus SHASHI BHALLA ..........Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Prathiba M. singh, Mr. Kirtiman singh and Mr. Sumeet Bhatia, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J. (Oral) CM No. 23065/2011 (exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. RC.Rev. No. 536/2011 and CM Nos. 23063-23064/2011.1. In the first instance, parties were exploring possibility of a settlement through negotiation and for this purpose, matter had been adjourned for short dates but it has been reported by the parties that no settlement is possible..2. Arguments have been heard. Impugned order is the order dated 09.09.2011 vide which the application for leave to defend filed by the tenant in a pending eviction petition under Section RCR No. 536/2011 Page 1 of 8 14(1)(e) ...
Tag this Judgment!