Delhi Court September 2010 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2010 Page 12 of about 113 results (0.016 seconds)Sh. S.K. Chopra and Others Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Order (Oral) The three applicants in this O.A. who are Administrative Officers are aggrieved by the order dated 04.06.2010 (Annexure A-1 page-33) by which they have been transferred and relieved from Delhi with effect from the same date to report for duty at Chennai, Hyderabad and Pune respectively. They have further impugned Office Order dated 04.04.2007 (Annexure A-1A page-34) transferring the applicants along with three others on the recommendations of the Transfer Committee constituted by OM dated 11.8.2004. It is submitted that when the order dated 04.04.2007 was issued the applicants had approached the Tribunal in OA-598/2007 in which the following directions were passed on 26.09.2007:- “14.In view of the above, OA is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the representation of the applicants, if the same is made within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The respondents would pass a reasoned and speaking order within a period of...
Tag this Judgment!Aar Kay Film Lease (P) Ltd Vs. Om Singh Chauhan, Delhi
Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Barkat Ali Zaidi, President (Oral), J. 1. The shot facts of the case are that the complainant Om Singh Chauhan by hypothecating his car in favour of the OP (appellant) had taken a loan of Rs. One lac @ 15% p.a. for a period of 24 months, payable alongwith interest in 24 instalments, the first instalment being of Rs. 5800/- and the remaining 23 of Rs. 5400/- each. The complainant repaid the loan amount and its interest within 12 months much earlier than the period stipulated and asked the OP to issue No objection certificate, which the OP declined saying an amount of Rs. 7700/- was still outstanding towards the complainant in terms of point No. 9 of Article 8 of the Agreement executed between the parties which provided to pay Rs. 7700/- on the said amount in case of premature payment. 2. The complainant, therefore, filed a complaint against the OP with a prayer that OP be directed to issue the NOC without any further payment. 3. The Forum on consideration found the demand of OP for Rs. ...
Tag this Judgment!C.S.Gill Vs. Uoi and Another
Court: Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi
1. This Writ Petition has been transferred from Delhi High Court. 2. Petitioner by this petition prayed for issuing an order or direction to the respondent to promote the petitioner to the rank of Brigadier as his course mates have been promoted to the said rank from the date his batchmates junior to him has been so promoted with all consequential benefits with damages. 3. Petitioner was commissioned in Indian Army into the Corps of Engineers in the rank of Second Lieutenant in the year 1972. He was promoted in the rank of Captain in 1976 and obtained First Honours Degree in Mechanical Engineering in 1979. He was promoted in the rank of Major in the year 1984. During the year 1987-88, the petitioner was posted as Garrison Engineer at Nagrota in the State of Jammu and Kashmir. During that, Garrison Audit was carried out when his predecessor Major SK Dutta was the Engineer and in audit it was found there was an embezzlement of sum of Rs.22.49 lakhs and involvement of Major SK Dutta and...
Tag this Judgment!