Delhi Court July 2009 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vijay Prakash Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2009
Reported in: AIR2010Delhi7; 160(2009)DLT631
S. Ravindra Bhat, J.1. The petitioner in this proceeding under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenges a decision of the Central Information Commission (CIC) dated 17.12.2008 (the impugned order] affirming the decision of the appellate authority under the Right to Information Act, 2005 [hereafter, 'the Information Act'] not to allow disclosure of the information sought.2. The facts necessary for deciding the case are that the petitioner is a former officer of the Indian Air Force. He apparently got married in 2001. According to the averments, he had sought resignation from the Indian Air Force, which was granted on 30.09.2001. His wife was inducted in the Defence Research Development Organization (DRDO) on 31.03.2005 and was posted at 4, Air Force Selection Board ('AFSB'), Varanasi. Eventually, differences cropped up between the two, and his wife applied for divorce. The petitioner caused to be served, through his counsel, an application to the Station Commander, 4 AFSB, r...
Gujarat State Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-2009
Reported in: 2009(168)LC109(Delhi); 2009(241)ELT190(Del)
S. Ravindra Bhat, J.1. The writ petitioner challenges an order of the Central Government, made in revisional proceedings, which confirmed the order of the Collector of Central Excise. The Central Government's impugned order was made on 26.06.1982, which held that Oleum was used by the petitioners for the manufacture of Caprolactum and not for fertilizers and therefore, not entitled to the exemption notification of 1966 issued under the provisions of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter called 'the Excise Act').2. The brief facts necessary for deciding the case are that the Schedule to the Excise, by Item 14G, ('TI 14-G) classifies Acids. These include 'Nitric, Hydrochloric and Sulphuric Acids (including fuming acids and anhydrides thereof)'. Gases on the other hand were classified under Tariff Item 14 H. By virtue of a notification dated 30.06.1966, the Central Government exempted sulphuric acid, falling in TI 14G of the First Schedule to the Excise Act, intended for use ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›