Delhi Court October 2008 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors. Vs. Sudha Devi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2008
Reported in: 153(2008)DLT70; 2008(106)DRJ595
Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. Sudha Devi was admitted to the 'Maternity Ward' of G.T.B. Hospital, Shahdara on 7.7.2003 as an expectant mother. A caesarian section had to be performed. A male child was born to her the same day at 2.30 p.m. Needless to state because of the surgery, Sudha Devi was administered pain killers, sedatives and antibiotics which obviously affected her mental alertness. Being a Female Ward, no male members were allowed to stay in the ward. She had no female relatives to look after her and a lady in the neighbourhood, Indu volunteered to give her company in the hospital.2. At around 4:30 AM on 8.7.2003 the infant was found missing. Obviously the infant had been kidnapped. A FIR under Section 363 IPC, being FIR No. 157/2003 was registered with the local police at P.S. Dilshad Garden. The infant could not be found.3. Sudha Devi sued the hospital authorities as also the Government of NCT Delhi which had established the hospital for damages. She impleaded the Commissioner o...
income-tax Officer Vs. Mohar Singh Banarsi Dass Co.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2008
Reported in: [2009]176TAXMAN140(Delhi)
ORDERSunil Gaur, J.1. Leave to appeal against impugned order dated 10-8-2005 is sought by the appellant by contending that the trial court has committed an illegality in acquitting the respondents for offence under Section 276C of the Income-tax Act.2. Notice of this petition was issued to the respondents.3. The facts put forth in this petition are as under:During the course of assessment proceedings for the period relevant to the assessment year 1986-87 the Assessing Officer found that the accused No. 1 had accepted an aggregate a sum of Rs. 1,13,000 from three persons namely Smt. Moorti Devi, Ms. Anju Gupta and M/s. Prem Prakash & Sons. In order to verify the genuineness of the aforesaid loan, summons under Section 131 of the Income-tax Act issued to the concerned parties but despite service creditors did not comply against summons. Assessing Officer intimated the accused firm vide letter dated 3-2-1989 and after accused firm failed to establish the identity of cash creditors and bon...
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Salora International
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2008
Reported in: [2009]177TAXMAN456(Delhi)
ORDERCM 13322/2008 in ITA 1164/20081. The delay in re-filing is condoned.2. This application stands disposed of.ITA 1164/20083. This appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the 'said Act') filed by the revenue is directed against the order 29-6-2007 passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA 2878/ Delhi/2004 pertaining to the assessment year 2000-01.4. The only issue sought to be raised in this appeal relates to the expenditure of Rs. 4.29 crores on advertising/publicity for the purposes of making the assessee's product known to the market. The Assessing Officer had disallowed 1 /3rd of the said amount treating the same to be of capital nature by concluding that the expenditure gave an enduring benefit to the assessee. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) deleted the said addition and allowed the entire expenditure under Section 37(1) of the said Act by holding that the same was entirely revenue in nature.5. The Income-tax Appellate...
Pradeep Kumar Vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd. and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2008
Reported in: 2010ACJ141
V.B. Gupta, J.1. Present appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short as 'the Act') for enhancement of compensation has been filed by the appellant who is the injured in this case.2. Vide the impugned judgment dated 12.7.2005 passed by Dharmesh Sharma, Judge, M.A.C.T., Delhi (for short as 'the Tribunal'), a sum of Rs. 13,46,360 was awarded as compensation to the appellant along with interest at the rate of 6 per cent per annum from the date of filing of the petition till realization.3. Brief facts of this case are that on 12.6.2004 at about 1.30 p.m., the appellant was travelling in DTC bus bearing No. DL 1P-B 6517 and was going from Peera Garhi, Delhi to Bahadurgarh. When the bus reached Bahadurgarh Bus Stand and the appellant was in the process of alighting from the bus, respondent No. 2 Prakash who is the driver started the bus in a rash and negligent manner. As a result thereof, appellant fell down and his right arm was crushed by the tyre of the bus. Due to ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›