Delhi Court July 2007 Judgments

Baldev Raj Vs. Chander Prakash and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 142(2007)DLT259; II(2007)DMC289; 2007(97)DRJ515

Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.1. This criminal revision petition has been filed by Mr Baldev Raj against an order of acquittal passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge on 06.07.2002, whereby the respondents have been acquitted of the offences under Section 498A and 304B IPC. The petitioner (Mr Baldev Raj) is the father of the deceased Kavita, who died on 06.07.1993 as a result of a fall from the fourth floor of her matrimonial home. Late Kavita was married to the respondent No. 1 (Chander Prakash) on 02.02.1989. They had a girl child of about 3-1/2 years of age at the time of Kavita's demise. The respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 4 are the brothers-in-law of late Kavita. The respondent No. 5 (Gulshan Rani) is Kavita's mother-in-law. It is relevant to point out that no appeal was preferred against the order of acquittal by the Government of NCT of Delhi. Since the petitioner is aggrieved and he has no recourse to file an appeal, the present criminal revision petition has been filed by him.2. The ...

Everest Sanitation (India) and anr. Vs. Delhi Jal Board and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 148(2008)DLT26

S. Ravindra Bhat, J.1. In these writ proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, a condition has been imposed by the respondent Delhi Jal Board(hereafter referred to as 'DJB') through a circular, requiring testing of water meters before their procurement has been impugned.2. The petitioners claim to be engaged in the business of manufacturing water meters (domestic type). They also claim to hold valid licenses for use of ISI Standard Mark, issued by the Indian Standards Institution, by virtue of the Indian Standards Institution (Certification Marks) Act, 1952. It is averred that the use of ISI Standard Mark is governed by the provisions of Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 (hereafter referred to as 'BIS') Act as well as the Rules and Regulations framed under that Act. The bids has spelt out standards applicable to the domestic water meters, which have to be adhered to by the manufacturers, to qualify the use of such mark. The specifications are contained in Indian St...

Surjan Singh and ors. Vs. Financial Commissioner and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 142(2007)DLT123

S. Ravindra Bhat, J.1. In these writ petitions, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners question orders made by the Financial Commissioner in consolidation proceedings, in terms of the East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation ) Act, 1948, as extended to Delhi (called 'the Act') in Village Mundka, Delhi started in 1975. A scheme of consolidation was drawn up inviting applications for residential plots in the extended Lal Dora within thirty days from 1.4.76. The scheme was published and was confirmed by the Settlement Officer (Consolidation) on 26.7.1976. In terms of the confirmed scheme, repartition of residential plots within the extended Lal Dora as well as agricultural lands were effected, by authorities under the Act.2. A resolution was passed by the village panchayat on 29.4.1979 suggesting variations in the scheme and on 8.5.1979 the Settlement Officer issued an order, holding inter alias that:(1) Claims in applications allowed by...

Bakeman'S Industries PVT LMT Vs. New Cawnpore Floor Mills And Ors. Overruled

Court: Delhi

Mukul Mudgal, J.1. This Company Appeal is directed against the orders dated 17th July 2004, 27th July 2004 and 30th July 2004 passed by the Learned Company Judge by which the Learned Company Judge dismissed the application of the appellant company, M/S Bakemans Industries Private Limited and accepted the bid of the respondent No. 4, Ceylon Biscuits Limited. The respondent No. 1 is the New Cawnpore Floor Mills Pvt. Ltd., the Respondent No. 2 is the State Industrial and Investment Corporation of Maharashtra (hereinafter referred to as the SICOM) and the respondent No. 3 is the Official Liquidator, Govt. of India, Ministry of Finance and Company Affairs.2. The brief facts of the case are as follows:a) One NRI Lead Bank which purported to be a financier of the appellant company M/S Bakemans Industries Limited had obtained an award against the appellant company. In order to enforce that award, Execution Petition No. 288/2003 was filed. The respondent No. 2, SICOM was the judgment debtor No....

Mrs. Dipika S. Kumar Wife of Shri Vs. National Capital Territory of

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

1. In this OA, the applicant has sought a direction to the respondents to fix her emoluments on the basis of equal pay for equal work in the light of the order of the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in CWP No.1493/2003 and the respondents Notification dated 12.09.2002, with all consequential benefits, including promotion.2. The brief facts of the case, as narrated by the applicant, are that on 05.05.1998, the Staff Nurses of various Hospitals in the Union Territory of Delhi, under the control and supervision of the respondents, resorted to indefinite strike. The respondents initiated action against the striking nurses under the Essential Services Maintenance Act. At the same time, they issued an advertisement in various newspapers inviting the services of eligible and qualified nurses with the assurance that those who joined the duties in the strike period shall get regular appointment. The applicant who, at that time, was working in a private hospital, opted to offer her servi...

Asstt. Cit, Range-1 Vs. Smt. Iqbal Kaur

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

1. This is an appeal filed by the revenue against the order of CIT(Appeals) dated 14-5-2004 for the assessment year 2001-02, in the matter of orders passed under Section 143(3)/148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.2. Rival contentions have been heard and record perused. In the grounds of appeal as many as ten grounds have been raised by the revenue but the crux of the issue revolves around the direction of the CIT(Appeals) for allowing claim of deduction under Section 80HHC of the Act on the interest income of the assessee who is 100 per cent exporter. In the course of assessment, under Section 143(3)/148 of the Act, the assessing officer treated the interest income credited in the P&L account on FDRs, as income from 'other sources' instead of 'business income'. The Assessing Officer also did not allow netting of the interest expenditure paid on the overdraft limit availed against FDRs held by it, on which the assessee has earned interest income.3. By the impugned order, CIT(Appeals) o...