Delhi Court April 2007 Judgments

Ajay Gupta Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (2007)210CTR(Del)116; 2007(97)DRJ317; [2008]297ITR125(Delhi)

Vikramajit Sen, J.1. The question which calls for consideration in this Petition concerns the date from which the Income Tax Department is liable to pay interest on the amount of money/assets seized from the Petitioner in the course of a Search conducted on 2.7.2002 under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (IT Act). In the course of this Search, cash amounting to Rs.35,15,000/- was discovered at the premises of the Petitioner/assessed, out of which there was a Seizure of Rs.33,00,000/-. It is the case of the Department that during the Block Assessment proceedings the assessed could sufficiently explain only a part of the cash seized during the Search. The Block Assessment proceedings were completed vide Assessment Order dated 30.7.2004 According to the Department, the assessed's undisclosed income aggregated Rs.12,43,232/-, attracting a tax demand of Rs.7,83,236/- together with a penalty of Rs.7,83,236/- under Section 158BFA(2) of the IT Act, thus raising a total demand of Rs.15,6...

Joginder Babbar (Dr.) Vs. G.L. Kaul Kilam

Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Mr. Justice J.D. Kapoor, President (Oral): 1. Vide impugned order dated 7.11.2001, the appellant doctor, who is a dental surgeon has been directed to pay Rs. 12,000 as damages for pain and sufferings besides another Rs. 3,000 as cost of litigation for faulty fixing of the bridge and metal crowing of the teeth at the clinic of the appellant. 2. Feeling aggrieved the appellant has preferred this appeal. 3. The allegations of the respondent leading to the impugned order in brief were that he had a dental problem and approached the appellant Dr. Babbar Dental Clinic where he was charged a sum of Rs. 11,200 vide receipt No. 3/111641 dated 10.7.1999 and a bridge was fixed on his upper jaw and white metal on the moler teeth, The teeth was also grinded and a metal crown was also fixed. The appellant Dr. Joginder Babbar had assured him that the teeth will last for more than 20 years. Subsequently the respondent had the problem and had contacted various hospitals including Lok Nayak Jaya Prakash...

Asstt. Sub-inspector Dalbir Vs. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi Through

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

1. Challenge in the present Original Application filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 is to order dated 30.5.2006 (Annexure A-2) passed by Additional Commissioner of Police, Special Branch, Delhi by which the applicant was visited with the punishment of forfeiture of one year of approved service temporarily for a period of one year, entailing reduction in his pay from Rs. 5300/- to 5200/- for a period of one year with immediate effect and also to Appellate Order dated 22.9.2006 (Annexure A-3) passed by the Commissioner of Police, Delhi by which an appeal carried against order dated 30.5.2006 (Annexure A-2) was dismissed.2. The brief facts, as projected in the Application, reveal that the applicant was appointed as a Constable in Delhi Police on 4.8.1975. He was promoted to the rank of Head Constable in 1985 and then to the rank of Assistant Sub Inspector in 2000. The applicant is stated to have rendered his duties efficiently and diligently, and is having u...

Sumer Singh, Inspector in Delhi Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi (Through

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

1. Sumer Singh, Inspector in Delhi Police, applicant herein, was proceeded in a regular departmental enquiry on the charge that he failed to supervise his subordinates, who were indulging in conducting bogus Passports verification on a large scale. Vide order dated 3.11.2004, Joint Commissioner of Police, Special Cell, Delhi (Annexure A-3) imposed a major penalty of forfeiture of two years of approved service on the applicant temporarily, entailing reduction in pay from Rs. 8900/- to Rs. 8500/-per month in the time scale of pay of Rs. 6500-200-10500 with immediate effect and the period of suspension from 29.2.2002 to 1.11.2002 was decided as 'not spent on duty' for all intents and purposes. Aggrieved, the applicant filed an appeal against the order dated 3.11.2004 (Annexure A-3), which has since been dismissed by the Commissioner of Police vide order dated 1.4.2005 (Annexure A-4). In the present Original Application filed by the applicant under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribuna...

All India Police Telecom Officers Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

1. In this OA the applicants, Group `A' officers of Directorate of Co-ordination, Police Wireless (DCPW, for short), have sought the following pay scales w.e.f. 01.01.1996, in terms of their representation dated 09.03.2004:Name & No. No. Existing Pay Proposed Payof posts of posts Scale ScaleAssistant Director 18 80000-13500 Rs. 8000-13500 (for 50%postsAssistant Director 2 8000-13500 Rs. 10000-15200 (for 50% posts(Cipher) of each category as Senior TimeDeputy Director 2 12000-16500 12000-16500 (Cipher) 2. The brief facts of the case are that All India Police Telecom Officers' Association (PTOA, for short), vide its Memo dated 12.03.1997, submitted a representation to the then Special Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA, for short) and Member Empowered Committee for removal of anomalies in the recommendations of the 5th Central Pay Commission (5th CPC, for short) in respect of gazetted officers of DCPW. This was followed by a meeting of the Office Bearers of PTOA with the Speci...

Beer Singh Sub Fire Officer Vs. Chief Fire Officer, Delhi Fire

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

1. In this OA the applicant has sought direction of this Tribunal to the official respondent to consider the applicant for promotion to the posts of Sub Officer and Station Officer from the date from which his junior, Shri Zile Singh, was promoted to those posts, with all consequential benefits.2. The brief facts of the case are that the applicant joined Delhi Fire Service as Fireman on 01.08.1973. He was promoted as Leading Fireman on 25.11.1989. The applicant was selected by a duly constituted DPC in its meeting held on 08.11.1993 and was nominated to undergo the Course of Sub Officer at National Fire Service College (NFSC, for short), Nagpur in 1994. However, he could not join the Course as he reached the Institute late. In the meanwhile, on 26.01.1994, the applicant got involved in a criminal case in his personal and private capacity and was placed under deemed suspension on account of having remained in police custody for more than 48 hours. He was, therefore, not allowed to proc...