Delhi Court August 2003 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Saroj Bala and anr. Vs. First Secretary, Ussr Embassy and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2003
Reported in: III(2004)ACC100; 2005ACJ1585; 2003VAD(Delhi)391; 2003RLR517
S.K. Mahajan, J. 1. This order will dispose of the appeal filed by the appellants against the judgment of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dated 16th November, 1987 whereby the claim of the appellants for compensation for the death of Narinder Kumar Malhotra, husband of appellant No.1 and father of appellant No.2 in a road accident alleged to have been caused due to rash and negligent driving of a car belonging to the USSR Embassy by its driver, was dismissed. A few facts giving rise to this appeal are: The deceased Narinder Kumar Malhotra on December 6, 1980 was going on his motorcycle at about 11.30 pm from Chanakya cinema side on Vinay Marg when a car belonging to the USSR Embassy and bearing registration No.75 CD 12 came from the opposite direction and hit the motorcycle of the said Narinder Kumar Malhotra. The car at the relevant time was allegedly driven in a rash and negligent manner by its driver and accident was alleged to have been caused due to the rash and negligent drivi...
Shri Anirudh Singh Katoch Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2003
Reported in: 2003VAD(Delhi)337; 105(2003)DLT887; 2003(89)ECC834
A.K. Sikri, J.1. The petitioner in this case is challenging the action of the respondent No.3 in giving custom clearance in respect of one fire arm only and detaining two other firearms. The reason given by the respondents is that as per Baggage Rules, 1998 , the petitioner could be permitted only one firearm on transfer of his residence. His case is that he holds three valid licenses with respect to three firearms as required under the Arms Act, 1959 and on transfer of his residence as per Baggage Rules, 1998 a person holding a valid license to possess arms in India ought to be permitted to bring into India all three firearms and there is no such restriction to carry one firearm only.2. The petitioner claims to be a respectable Indian citizen and the grandson of Sh.Rai Bahadur Beni Chand Katoch, who was the Inspector General of Prisons (Northern India). He had gone to the USA for the purpose of his studies in the year 1984 and after obtaining degree of B.S.(Computer Science) with Hono...
Bhagat Singh and ors. Vs. the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-01-2003
Reported in: 2004IAD(Delhi)144; 108(2003)DLT259; I(2004)DMC22; 2003(71)DRJ530; 2004(1)JCC161
S.K. Agarwal, J.1. This is an application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 215/2002 u/Ss. 406/498-A/34 IPC, P.S., Prasad Nagar, Delhi. 2. Petitioner no. 1 is the husband; petitioner no. 2 is father in law; petitioner no. 3 is mother in law; petitioners 4 and 5 are the married sister in laws and petitioner no. 6 is brother-in-law (Jeth). Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the outset, submitted that petitioner 2 and 3 were granted regular bail vide order dated 1st October, 2002; thereforee, their petition is dismissed as infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner next argued that on 20.7.2000, petitioner No. 1 and his father were granted interim bail for one week to enable them to settle all matters with the complainant and to return dowry/Istridhanarticles by the court of Additional Sessions Judge (for short 'ASJ). The disputes between the parties could not be resolved. Thereafter, petitioners 1 and 2 along with four other relations, ...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›