Delhi Court July 2003 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2003 Page 28 of about 274 results (0.017 seconds)Ram Krishna Vs. Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking
Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Rumnita Mittal, Member: 1. This appeal is directed against order dated 25.3.1997, passed by District Forum, Janakpuri, New Delhi in Complaint Case No. 180/1997 - entitled Shri Ram Krishan and Ors. v. The General Manager, D.E.S.U. 2. The relevant facts, in brief are, that the appellants had filed a joint complaint before the District Forum with the following grievances : (a) that because of frequent load shedding in their area electricity was not available for several hours at a stretch as a result of which education of their children was suffering and they were unable to carry out their daily chores; (b) that the respondent had been sending wrong bills and, as such, the appellants had to waste lot of time standing in queue for rectification of the same in the office of the respondent; (c) that though a separate transformer had been provided for the colony of the appellants yet for getting their complaints registered they had to walk 2 kms. to Milap Nagar Power House of the respondent; ...
Tag this Judgment!Rakesh Goel Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Rumnita Mittal, Member: 1. This appeal has been filed assailing the order dated 7.7.2000 passed by District Forum-IV, Nand Nagri, Delhi, in Complaint Case No. 218/1999 entitled Shri Rakesh Goel v. Union of India and Others. 2. The relevant facts, in brief, are that the appellant had filed a complaint before the District Forum, under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), with the grievance that a registered letter addressed to him was wilfully and deliberately not delivered by the Postman to Smt. Kusum Lata, a member of his family in his absence on 14.12.1998. It was the case of the appellant that the Postman of the area, respondent No. 3 had come to the house of the appellant and has started making uncalled for inquiries from Smt. Kusum Lata about the whereabouts of the appellant and had refused to deliver a registered letter addressed to him, to any one else. Thereafter he had issued an intimation slip directing that the said dak be coll...
Tag this Judgment!Mrs. Uma Sehgal Vs. Manager, Punjab National Bank
Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Rumnita Mittal, Member: 1. This appeal has been filed assailing the order dated 13.7.1999, passed by District Forum, Janak Puri, New Delhi, in Complaint Case No. 1667/1997 entitled Mrs. Uma Sehgal v. The Manager, Punjab National Bank. 2. Briefly stated, the facts are, that the appellant had filed a complaint before the District Forum, under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), with the grievance that she was maintaining a Savings Bank Account No. 13378 with the respondent Bank and had deposited Rs. 25,000/- in the said account through her husband Shri K.D. Sehgal on 2.5.1996. However, the cheque for Rs. 78,000/- issued by the complainant in favour of her husband was dishonoured on account of insufficient funds in the account of the appellant as the amount of Rs. 25,000/- deposited by the appellant on 2.5.1996 had not been credited in her account though an entry for the said amount had been made in her pass book, after two days of the de...
Tag this Judgment!Ashok Country Resort Vs. Divisional Manager, New India Assurance Co. L ...
Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi
Lokeshwar Prasad, President: 1. The complainant, Ashok Country Resort, through its promoter, Shri R.N. Sahni, has filed the present complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), against the above said opposite parties (for short OPs) averring (sic.) Kapashera, New Delhi, for Rs. 4.90 crores, vide Policy bearing No. 1131120108594, for the period from 28th July, 1993 to 27th July, 1994 which was issued by OP No. 2 (Branch Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., 13/46, Scindia House, 2nd Floor, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi). It is stated that on 1st June, 1994 there was a fire incident at the resort which was promptly reported by the complainant and the Surveyor appointed by the OPs, visited the site on 11th June, 1994. It is stated that for the settlement of the claim under the Policy, the complainant have been following up the matter with the OPs and a consolidated statement of claim, aggregating Rs. 7,25,954.18 was submitted by ...
Tag this Judgment!