Delhi Court November 2003 Judgments

Life Insurance Corporation of India Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2004(72)DRJ278; 2004(2)SLJ371(Delhi)

Mukul Mudgal, J.1. Rule has already been issued in the writ petition on 5th April, 1994.2. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the writ petition is taken up today for final hearing.3. This writ petition challenges the Award dated 29th January, 1993, passed in I.D. No. 39 of 1990 by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, New Delhi (in short the 'CGIT') by which the following industrial dispute was adjudicated upon by the CGIT:-'Whether the action of the management of L.I.C. of India in terminating the services of Shri S.K. Verma, Ex-Development Officer, is justified? If not, to what relief the workman is entitled?'4. There is long pending litigation between the parties. The respondent No. 3 had joined the services of the petitioner, Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) on 1st February, 1962 and his services were terminated on 8th February, 1969, leading to a challenge thereto which led to an Order of the CGIT dated 10th February, 1984, directing the reinstatement of the re...

Mangna Vs. State

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2004(72)DRJ469

S.K. Agarwal, J.1. By this petition under Section 439, Cr.P.C. read with Section 37 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short 'NDPS Act') petitioner is seeking bail in case FIR No. 831/99, under Sections 21/61/85 NDPS Act, P.S. Mangolpuri. Petitioner's first application for bail was dismissed by Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.D. Kapoor vide order dated 13.11.2002 passed in Crl. M. (M) No. 3691/2002.2. Prosecution allegations in brief are that on 16.9.1999 at about 1.55 p.m., petitioner was apprehended near Jhuggi Camp, Beniwal, Nagar, Parwana Road, Pitampura, Delhi and 700 gms of smack was recovered from her possession. The same was seized and sealed; samples were drawn in accordance with law. In the course of investigation, the sample was sent for analysis to the Forensic Science Laboratory, Government of NCT of Delhi (for short 'FSL'), which after Chemical analysis, vide its report dated 13.9.1999 opined that no diacetylmorphine or other opium derivatives, were found in ...

Spencer and Black Smith Vs. Government of N.C.T. of Delhi

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (2004)ILLJ1126Del

MUKUL MUDGAL, J.1. Rule.2. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the writ petition is taken up today for final hearing.3. This writ petition challenges the Order dated May 15, 2000 of the Labour Court No. V which set aside the ex parte Award dated August 17, 1999 against the petitioner but directed the payment of Rs. 40,000/- which was to be adjusted against the amount which may be awarded to the workman respondent No. 3 herein upon the final disposal of the dispute pending before the Labour Court. The amount was to be refunded to the petitioner in the event of the respondent No. 3, failing in his claim.4. The petitioner is only aggrieved by that portion of the Order dated May 15, 2000 which directs the payment of Rs. 40,000/- to the workman as it has already deposited the sum of Rs. 40,000/-in this Court. The main contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Kalra is that in case the petitioner succeeds in the dispute pending before the Labour Court, the petit...

Oriental Insurance Co. Limited Vs. Bhatter Silver Smith Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Lokeshwar Prasad, President: 1. The present appeal, filed by the appellant, under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) is directed against order dated 8.3.2003, passed by District Forum (Central), Maharana Pratap Bus Terminal, ISBT, Kashmere Gate, Delhi in Complaint Case No. 328/2002 entitled M/s. Bhatter Silver Smith Pvt. Ltd. v. The Oriental Insurance Company Limited and Anr. 2. The facts, relevant for the disposal of the present appeal, briefly stated, are that the respondent M/s. Bhatter Silver Smith Pvt. Ltd. through its Director Shri Roshan Dabriwal, had filed a complaint under Section 12 of the Act before the District Forum, averring therein that the respondent was engaged in the business of fabrication of silver jewellery and a Jewellers Block Insurance Policy bearing No. 46/45/99/90041 was obtained by the respondent from the appellant for the period from 5.6.1998 to 4.6.1999, covering stocks for Rs. 50,000/- and cash and currency...

State Vs. Sunil Kumar Mandal

Court: Delhi

Reported in: I(2004)DMC86; 2004(72)DRJ229

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.1. By the judgment dated 30-10-2001, accused Sunil Kumar Mandal stands convicted of an offence under Section 302 IPC and Section 498A IPC. By order dated 2-11-2001 the learned Addl. Sessions Judge pronounced the sentence of death for the offence under Section 302 IPC besides a fine of Rs. 5,000/-. In view of the sentence imposed under Section 302 IPC no separate sentence under Section 498A was imposed.2. Has the prosecution successfully brought home the charge against the accused. The charge is as under:-'That on 1-7-1999 at about 2.15 AM (night) at your house (B-29, Khajan Basti, Maya Puri, New Delhi) with intention to kill Anita, you had sprinkled kerosene oil on your wife Anita and had set her on fire resulting in her death thereby yon have committed an offence punishable under Section 302 IPC and within the cognizance of this Court. Secondly, you married Anita (since died) on 18-2-1999 and there after you had been demanding Rs. 5,000/- as dowry from Anita and u...