Delhi Court August 2001 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mukesh Hans Etc. Etc. Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2001
Reported in: 94(2001)DLT860; 2001(60)DRJ376
ORDERMadan B. Lokur, J.1. A Notification bearing No.F.9(20)/78-L& B(i) dated 30th June, 1988 was issued on behalf of the Lieutenant Governor. Delhi Stating therein that 72 bighas of land in Village Mehrauli were likely to be required for the planned development of Delhi. The Notification, issued under the provisions of Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), accordingly notified the land in question as being likely to be required for the above purpose. The Lt. Governor was of opinion that the provisions of Section 17(1) of the Act are also applicable to this land and was further pleased to direct, under the provisions of Section 17(4) of the Act, that the provisions of Section 5A thereof shall not apply. In other words, the land owners were denied their right to object to the proposed acquisition of their land.2. The Notification is Annexure P-1 to Civil Writ Petition No.1580 of 1988 and this reads as follows:-'DELHI ADMINISTRATION : DELHI(...
Mohd. Sadiq Vs. the State and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2001
Reported in: 94(2001)DLT472; II(2001)DMC751; 2001(60)DRJ402
ORDERS.K. Agarwal, J. 1. This petition u/s. 397/401 Cr.P.C. r/w. S. 482 Cr.P.C. is directed against the judgment and order dated 12-3-1998 passed by Sh. R.K. Yadav, ASJ, Shahdara holding that the order of maintenance under Section 125 Cr. P.C. in favor of respondent No.2 would operate from the date of the application.2. Facts in brief are: that Smt. Farhana (respondent No.2) filed a petition u/s. 125 Cr.P.C. against the petitioner for grant of maintenance alleging that she was married to the petitioner on 28th March, 1989 as per muslim rites and ceremonies, that she was subjected mal-treated for bringing less dowry and was ultimately deserted and was forced and was forced to live with her parents. It was stated that petitioner was working in the MCD and she was not able to maintain herself Petitioner filed reply denying the allegations and stating that she had left the matrimonial house of her own choice and was not entitled to give maintenance. The petitioner also filed a petition for...
Mohd. Tahir Vs. the State and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2001
Reported in: 2002CriLJ389; 94(2001)DLT454; I(2002)DMC102; 2002(61)DRJ68
ORDERS.K. Agarwal, J.1. This petition u/s. 397/401 Cr. P.C. r/w. S. 482 Cr. P.C. is directed against the judgment and order dated 12-3-1998 passed by Sh. R.K. Yadav, ASJ, Shahdara holding that the order of maintenance u/s. 125 Cr. P.C. in favor of respondent No.2 would operate from the date of the application.2. Smt. Yasmin (respondent NO.2) and Master Shahbaz, minor through her mother, filed a petition u/s. 125 Cr. P.C. against the petitioner for grant of maintenance. It was alleged that respondent No.2 was married to the petitioner on 28th March, 1989 as per muslim rites and ceremonies. Respondent No.3 was born out of the said wed-lock. The petitioner mal-treated the respondent No.2 for bringing less dowry. She was deserted and was forced to live with her parents. Petitioner refused to take her back. It was stated that petitioner was working in the MCD. Respondent No.2 was un-educated and was not be able to maintain herself and her child. Petitioner field reply stating that she had d...
Sh. Narender Mann Vs. State (Nct of Delhi) and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2001
Reported in: 2002CriLJ823; 94(2001)DLT107
ORDERS.K. Agarwal, J.1. This petition under Section 397/401/439 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, 'Cr.P.C.') and Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the order dated 18th August, 2001 passed by the Court of Shri. J.P. Narain, Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi dismissing application of the Investigating Officer, for police custody remand of Divya Gupta, the accused (respondent No. 2) and ordering his release on bail, in the case FIR No. 225/2001, P.S. Geeta Colony; Delhi under Section 63 of the Copyright Act, Section 78/79 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, Section 27 of the Drugs And Cosmetics Act (for short 'DAC Act') and Sections 420/468/571 of the IPC.2. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have been taken through the record.3. On 17th August, 2001, respondent No. 2 Divya Gupta was arrested by the police; huge quantity of spurious drugs were recovered from his car and from his residence at Rohini. On 18th...
New Delhi Municipal Committee Vs. the Kerala State Handicrafts Emporiu ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2001
Reported in: 95(2002)DLT320; 2001(60)DRJ478
ORDERManmohan Sarin, J.1. Petitioner NDMC has filed this writ petition seeking a writ of certiorari for quashing the order dated 16.12.1976 passed by the Additional District Magistrate allowing the Appeal No.212/76 filed by the respondents. The petitioners had earlier dismissed the objections of the respondents against the proposal to determine the rateable value of property No.B-7, State Emporia Building, Kharag Singh Marg, New Delhi at Rs. 1,86,660/- less 10%. The petitioners had assessed the property to tax, though the same admittedly belonged to the State Government. Respondent case was that the property owned by the State was not exigible to tax by NDMC.2. The Additional District Magistrate, as noticed above, allowed the appeal by the impugned order dated 16.12.1976, holding that assessment made by the petitioner Committee of a property belonging to the State Government was prima facie illegal as the said properties were exempted from the levy of property tax. He relied on State o...
Khairati Lal Khurana Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2001
Reported in: AIR2002Delhi40
ORDERArijit Pasayat, C.J. 1. 'Physician heal thyself'- says New Testament, Luke IV,23. This petition is by the father of an unfortunate boy who died on 7.9.1996, alleging that his son's loss of life was on account of callous attitude of medical authorities, more particularly respondent No.4 who at the relevant point was the Medical Superintendent (Nursing Homes).2. A person has a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, 1950 (in short, the Constitution) of take steps in self-preservation in case of ailment. It is to be borne in mind that self- preservation of one's life is the necessary concomitant of the right to life enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution-sacred, precious and inviolable. The importance and validity of the duty and right to self-preservation has a species in the right of self-defense in criminal law. Centuries ago thinkers of this Great Land conceived of such right and recognized it. Attention can usefully be drawn to verses, 1,18,20 and 2...
Shri Subhash Bindra Vs. Govt. of Nct and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2001
Reported in: 95(2002)DLT891; 2002(61)DRJ265
Mukul Mudgal, J.1. CM.9040/01, filed by the petitioner under Order VI Rule 17 CPC seeks amendment in the writ petition. None of the parties have any objection to this application being allowed. Application is accordingly allowed. The petitioner is permitted to amend the writ petition as prayed for. CM stands disposed of.Rule.With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up today for final hearing.2. This writ petition challenges the cancellation of license granted to respondent No.5-Delhi State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. for running the vend in Indian made Foreign Liquor at the premises owned by the petitioner bearing No.WZ-33, Krishna Puri, Tilak Nagar, New Delhi as per the Letter dated 22nd January, 2001.3. The petitioner's case in his own words is as follows:'Accordingly the petitioner became entitled to a regular Commission at the rate of Twelve and a half percent on the gross sale amount earned by the DSCSC Ltd. The said license was granted by the said authority after ...
C.J. International Hotels Ltd. Vs. Ito
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2001
Reported in: (2004)91TTJ(Del)318
ORDERPramod Kumar, A.M.These appeals, filed by the assessed, are directed against the consolidated order dated 21-11-1995, passed by the Commissioner (Appeals)-V, New Delhi, in the matter of consolidated order under section 201 read with section 195 of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for the financial years 1991-92 and 1992-93. Grievance of the assessed, in substance, is that, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Commissioner (Appeals) erred in sustaining the impugned order which, according to the assessed, is contrary to the scheme of section 195 of the Act.2. The issue requiring our adjudication lies within a narrow compass of facts. The assessed- company, which owns a hotel known as Le-Meridien Hotel, entered into a franchise agreement with M/s Societe Des Hotels Meridien, France, on 16-9-1991, for the purpose of being affiliated with their chain of hotels and to benefit from the use of Meridien trade name, service mark, and service name, as...
C.J. International Hotels Ltd. Vs. Ito (Tds)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2001
Reported in: [2001]79ITD506(Delhi)
ORDERPramod Kumar, A.M.These appeals, filed by the assessed, are directed against the consolidated order dated 21-11-1995 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals)-V, New Delhi, in the matter of consolidated order under section 201 read with section 195 of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for the financial years 1991-92 and 1992-93. Grievance of the assessed, in substance, is that, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Commissioner (Appeals) erred in sustaining the impugned order which, according to the assessed, is contrary to the scheme of section 195 of the Act.2. The issue requiring our adjudication lies within a narrow compass of facts. The assessed-company, which owns a hotel known as Le-Meridien Hotel, entered into a franchise agreement with M/s Societe Des Hotels Meridien, France, on 16-9-1991, for the purpose of being affiliated with their chain of hotels and to benefit from the use of Meridien trade name, service mark, and service name, as w...
Subhash Chander and ors. Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-30-2001
Reported in: 2001(60)DRJ136
R.S. Sodhi, J.Crl.M. (M) 3108/2001 1. I have heard learned counsel for the parties, Learned counsel for the petitioners states that petitioner No. 1 and the complainant, arc living together as husband and wife and have settled all their differences. He further states that the complainant who is present in Court today does not wish to pursue the proceedings arising out of her complaint which was then recorded as F.I.R. No. 87/91 under Section 498-A/406 IPC registered at Police Station Roop Nagar, thereforee, no useful purpose will be served in continuing with the criminal proceedings when the marriage between the parties has survived. Learned counsel for the state also agrees with the same. Learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Banati identifies Ms. Kamlesh, let her statement be recorded.2. Statement of Ms. Kamlesh has been recorded. In view of what has been slated by learned counsel for the parties and also the statement of Ms. Kamlesh, it would be proper that the matter is put to r...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »