Delhi Court July 1999 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
G.S. Kalra Vs. New Delhi Municipal Committee and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-1999
Reported in: AIR1999Delhi355; 80(1999)DLT551
ORDERM.S. Siddiaui, J. 1. For the construction of the Maternity Centre at 40, Babar Road, New Delhi, petitioner's tender dated 8-8-1979 was accepted by the respondent. An agreement No. 7/ME(C-11)/79-80 to that effect was executed between the parties. In terms of the agreement the work was to start on 15-9-1979 and was to be completed on 14-7-1980, But the work was completed on 17-9-1981. By way of security deposit a sum of Rs. 24,567 remained deposited with the department. However, differences and disputes between the parties in respect of the said agreement were referred to the arbitrator, who gave his award on 20-7-92. The arbitrator has awarded a sum of Rs. 1,06,148.92 inclusive of pendente lite interest to the claimant/contractor. In addition, the arbitrator has also awarded interest @ Rs. 15% on the said amount. On 17-12-1992 arbitrator filed his award. Notice of filing of award was given to the parties. While the petitioner filed an application under Sections 14/17 of the Arbitra...
ishwar Chand JaIn Vs. Delhi Administration
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-1999
Reported in: 80(1999)DLT619
M.S.A. Siddiqui, J.1. The petitioner by way of this petition under Section 482, Cr.P.C. is seeking to set aside the order dated 6.9.1997 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi in Cr. Rev. No. 20/1997 and is also seeking for quashing the proceedings before the Metropolitan Magistrate, New Delhi.2. The respondent has filed a complaint against the petitioner under Sections 7/16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act. The subject matter of the prosecution is a seizure of sample of special khas SUPARI on 13.6.1991 by the Food Inspector. The sample on being examined by the Public Analyst was found to contain saccharin to the extent of 3506 P.P.M., which is vocative of Rule 47. During pendency of the criminal prosecution, Rule 47 was amended and the permissible limit of saccharin has been increased to 4000 P.P.M. as it has been found not to be harmful for human consumption.3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner contended that since the Rule 47 has been amended raising the permi...
C.B. Tanwar and Co. Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-01-1999
Reported in: 1999(50)DRJ652
M.S.A. Siddiqui, J. 1. By the agreement dated 13.4.1987, the petitioner was awarded the work of construction of SFS flats at Vasant Kunj SH Peripheral sewerage in sector 'D' pocket 5 to 9, New Delhi. During the execution of the contract certain disputes and differences arose between the parties with regard to the claims of the petitioner arising out of and in relation to the said contract, which were referred to the sole arbitrator in terms of the arbitration agreement. The arbitrator published his award on 14.7.1994 directing the respondent DDA to pay to the petitioner a sum of Rs. 1,94,756/- together with interest @ 15% per annum. While the petitioner filed the petition under Section 17 of the Arbitration Act for making the award a rule of the Court, the respondent DDA filed objections under Sections 30/33 of the Arbitration Act against the award.2. The respondent is mainly aggrieved by the award on the petitioner's claim Nos. 1,2, additional claim No.1, claim No. 4 and rejection of ...
- ‹ Prev
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›