Delhi Court September 1997 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bhagwan Dai Vs. Ministry for Development and Education
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-01-1997
Reported in: 1997(43)DRJ304
Devinder Gupta, J. (1) Petitioner No.1 is the widow and petitioner No.2 is the son of late Radhey Shyam, who was employed as a Class Iv Chowkidar in D.S. Arya Senior Secondary School on 28.1.1933 and died on 24.12.1973 and, thus, had completed 30 years of service. A direction was sought in this petition against respondent No.3 School to appoint petitioner No.2 in place of Radhey Shyam on compassionate grounds. Another direction, which was sought, was for payment of the pensionary benefits.(2) There is no dispute that the pensionary benefits, which were due and payable, have since been paid to petitioner No.1. The only claim, which survived thereafter was as regards appointment of petitioner No.2 on compassionate ground. During pendency of the writ petition on 2.11.1995 a direction was made to the respondent to consider the question of giving appointment to petitioner No.2 on compassionate ground, may not be as a Chowkidar but in any other Class Iv post. Pursuant to the said direction, ...
K. Lalchandani Vs. Meenu Lalchandani
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-01-1997
Reported in: 1997VIAD(Delhi)44; 68(1997)DLT712; II(1997)DMC363
N.G. Nandi, J. (1) These two cross civil revision petitions under Section 115, Cpc arise out of the order dated 6.7.1996 passed in Hindu Marriage Petition No. 20/94 under Sections 24-26 of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') thereby awarding maintenance pendente lite at the rate of Rs. 12,000.00 per month to the respondent/wife Smt.Meenu Lalchandani and three minor children from 4.11.1990 to 12.4.1994. (2) The petitioner/husband has challenged the aforesaid order being aggrieved with the grant of maintenance at the rate of Rs. 12,000/ per month u/Secs.24-26 of the Act whereas the respondent/wife has challenged the said order being aggrieved with the partial grant of her prayer. (3) It is not disputed that the marriage between the petitioner and respondent was solemnized on 10.9.1967; that three daughters and one son have been born to the respondent/wife through the petitioner / husband during the wedlock; that the spouses parted company on 18.8.90; that the pe...
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Rampur Distillery and Chemical C ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-01-1997
Reported in: (1998)60TTJ(Del)630
ORDERB. M. KOTHARI, A.M. :The two appeals by the Revenue relate to the same assessed and hence, we find it convenient to dispose of these appeals by this common order.2. The Revenue has raised the following grounds in its appeals for asst. yr. 1988-89 :'1. That the learned CIT(A) has erred in law and on the facts of the case in cancelling the order under s. 154 which was correctly passed by the AO for cancelling the order under s. 3(4) dt. 7th December, 1987, whereby the assessed was allowed to change its previous year.2. That the learned CIT(A) has erred in law and on the facts of the case in directing that the order under s. 3(4), dt. 7th December, 1987, will continue to be effective, without appreciating the fact that this would give rise to a situation where the assessed will have no previous year for asst. yr. 1988-89 and this situation would be incongruous with the provisions of s. 3 of the IT Act, 1961, as amended by the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987.'3. The facts relating...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›