Delhi Court October 1997 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Erum Travels Vs. Kanwar Rani
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-1997
Reported in: 1998IAD(Delhi)270; 69(1997)DLT567; (1997)117PLR42
Manmohan Sarin, J.(1) By this order, I would be deciding Civil Revision Petition No. 919 of 1997, which has been preferred against the order dated 26.8.1977, passed by the learned Additional District Judge, dismissing the application for review of an earlier order dated 23.5.1997 for deposit of rent and requiring the entire arrears to be cleared by 28.8.1977, failing which the defense would be struck off. (2) This order would also dispose of Civil Revision Petition No-925 ofl997, against the order dated 28.8.1997, by which the defense of the petitioner was struck off on the ground of non-payment of arrears of rent/damages and the evidence of the petitioner was closed. (3) The petitioner has assailed the impugned orders as being vitiated by material irregularity and illegal exercise of jurisdiction inasmuch as the order Xxxix, Rule 10, Cpc, does not empower the Court to pass an order for striking out the defense. The petitioner further contends that since the specifically applicable pro...
Jindal (India) Limited Vs. Cold Rollings India Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-1997
Reported in: 1998IAD(Delhi)278; 69(1997)DLT363; (1998)118PLR34
M.K. Sharma, J. (1) This is a petition filed under Section 391 read with Section 394 of the Companies Act by the transferee company praying for sanction of this Court to a scheme of amalgamation of Cold Rollings India Pvt. Ltd. (the transferor company) with the petitioner company (the transferee company). The scheme of amalgamation stipulates that all the properties, rights and claims whatsoever of the transferor company and its entire undertaking together with all rights and obligations relating thereto is to be transferred to and vested in the transferee company on the terms and conditions as set out in the scheme of amalgamation. (2) The transferee Company was incorporated on 14th January, 1952 under the provisions of the-Companies Act having its registered office at 'PIPE HOUSE' 56, Hanuman Road, New Delhi. The authorised share capital of the transferee company is Rs. 7,50,00,000.00 divided into 7,50,000 equity shares of Rs. 100.00 and paid up equity share capital is Rs. 6,50,00,00...
NaraIn Dutt Vs. Jawaharlal Nehru University
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-1997
Reported in: 1997VIAD(Delhi)337; 71(1998)DLT197; 1997(43)DRJ385; 1997RLR664
Arun Kumar, J. (1) The petitioner is employed in the Jawaharlal Nehru University, respondent herein. As an employee of the University, the petitioner has been maintaining various accounts, i.e., Group Insurance, G.P.F. Provident Fund etc. According to the petitioner he had nominated his wife Smt. Hira Devi in all the said accounts. The petitioner wanted to change the nomination by substituting the name of Kumari Champa, his grand-daughter (son's daughter) in place of his wife Smt Hira Devi. The reason given for this is that his wife Hira Devi had been living separately from the petitioner and there was litigation between the two. There was a Court order passed under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure under which an amount of Rs. 250.00 per month was being deducted from his salary by the University and paid to his wife Smt. Hira Devi as maintenance. The petitioner has stated that Smt. Hira Devu is not maintaining any relations with the petitioner for a long time and is residi...
Glaxo India Ltd. Vs. Eudora Laboratories Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-1997
Reported in: 1997(43)DRJ366
S.N. Kapoor, J.(1) Heard learned counsel for the parties at length on the application. (2) Two crucial questions arise in this matter and they are as under:- (I)Whether use of trade mark `BUPAR' prima facie amounts to infringement of the trade mark `ZUPUR'? (ii) What shall be the effect of grant of license under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 to the defendants for manufacturing the drug `BUPAR' on 15.7.1988 and grant of license to the plaintiff to manufacture `Bupar' on 27.7.1989 on the trade mark `BUPAR' and its use by the defendants(3) The case of the plaintiff is that the plaintiff adopted the trade mark `Bupar' in the year 1986 in respect of pharmaceutical, medicinal, veterinary preparations and sanitary substances. On 6th January, 1987, the plaintiff moved an application for registration and the said trade mark was duly registered under No. 465638 as of 6th January, 1987 in Class 5 in respect of pharmaceutical, medicinal, veterinary preparations and sanitary substances. The sai...
Trikha Ram Vs. Sahib Ram
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-1997
Reported in: 1998IAD(Delhi)341; 69(1997)DLT749; 1997(43)DRJ669
Manmohan Sarin, J.(1) This revision petition raises an interesting and important question as to whether the provisions of the Delhi Land Reforms Acts would continue to apply and govern land in respect of which a notification has been issued under Section 507 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act of 1957 for urbanizing the said land and declaring that the said rural area shall cease to be rural area? (2) This question has arisen for consideration in the facts stated below : (I)The petitioner, Shri Trikha Ram and respondent Shri Sahib Ram are real brothers, being sons of late Shri Chhedi Lal, Shri Chhedi Lal had purchased a plot of land bearing No. F-11, Subhash Mohalla, Village North Ghonda, Delhi, admeasuring 300 sq. yards, vide a registered sale deed in the year 1970 and raised some construction thereon. The petitioner, Shri Trikha Ram, who is in possession of portion constructed over 100 sq. yards, while respondent No. 1, Shri Sahib Ram is in possession of the portion of about 130 s...
Delhi State Committee of Communist Party of India (Marxist) Vs. Rajesh ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-1997
Reported in: 1997VIAD(Delhi)747; 69(1997)DLT622
Lokeshwar Prasad, J.(1) The present petition has been filed by the petitioner, named above, under Section 24 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure,1908 (hereinafter referred to as 'the CPC') with the prayer that necessary orders for transferring the Probate Petition No. 87/94, pending in the Court of District Judge, Delhi to this Court, be passed and the same be tried Along with Suit No. 601/94 - entitled Delhi State Committee of Communist Party of India (Marxist) v. Shri Rajesh Makhija & Ors. (2) The facts relevant for the disposal of the present petition he in a narrow compass. The petitioner has filed a suit (Suit No. 601/94 - entitled Delhi State Committee of Communist Party of India (Marxist) v. Shri Rajesh Malik and Others) for possession and mesne profits in respect of property bearing No.C-9, New Multan Nagar, New Delhi (to the extent of 3/4th share in the above said property) in this Court which is still pending. The above suit is in respect of a duly registered will ...
Satyaprakash Behl Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-1997
Reported in: 69(1997)DLT406
J.B. Goel, J. (1) In this writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioner has challenged the legality and validity of order of his detention dated 24.2.1997 passed by the Deputy Director General (Coordination), Narcotics Control Bureau under Section 3(1) of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 (for short the 'Act') on the grounds of detention as communicated vide separate Memorandum dated 24.2.1997 and also the subsequent declaration No. 7/97 dated 3.4.1997 passed by the Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue under Section 10(1) of the Act. (2) The Order for detention of the petitioner is stated to have been made ' with a view to preventing him from engaging in the procurement, storage and abetting in the export from India of narcotic drugs'. (3) The material facts stated in the grounds of detention are th...
Sanjay Gulati Vs. State Bank of India and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-1997
Reported in: 71(1998)DLT251; 1998(44)DRJ538
Devinder Gupta, J.(1) The petitioner is seeking direction against the respondent for regularisation of his service as Assistant Engineer (Civil) with all benefits of seniority. Provident Fund, Employees' Family Pension, fixation of pay etc. interims of Circular letter dated 14.3.1995 with further direction to respondent-Bank to pay to him salary at par with the regularly deployed Assistant Engineer (Civil)and restraining it from terminating his service.(2) The petitioner holds a degree in B.E. (Civil) with 63.4% marks and claims that earlier he had joined service with M/s. Allied Architects in July, 1989 where he worked till September, 1993 and was drawing a salary of Rs. 4,200.00 p.m. On2.6.1991 respondent-Bank through advertisement Annexure P-1 invited applications for appointment of Site Engineers in the grade of Rs. 1750-2250 with consolidated monthly salary. It is the petitioner's case that 259 applications were received.The petitioner was one of the candidates, who also received ...
Syndicate Bank Vs. Begum International and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-1997
Reported in: 72(1998)DLT168
S.N. Kapoor, J. (1) Syndicate Bank, Asaf Ali Road, has filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 5,42,314.31p. through its Chief Manager and Principal Officer Sh. K.G.P. Pillai. He also claims to be duly constituted attorney of the plaintiff Bank and titled to institute the suit. He is the person who has signed and verified the plaint. I.I. M/s. Begum International, a partnership firm comprising of two partners, namely, S. Krishna Sharma and S. Ravi, availed credit facilities under the following three heads: (a) Packing Credit limit 4/81 dated 29.5.1981 with a limit of Rs. 50,000.00 . (b) Over-draft against hypothecation Odh 56/81 dated 16.9.81 for Rs. 2,00,000.00 . (e) Packing Credit Limit 6/81 dated 4.11.1981 for Rs. 50,000.00 . 1.2. Both the partners in consideration of and to secure repayment of the Packing Credit limit 4/81 executed an Export Credit Agreement, a Demand Promissory Note for a sum of Rs. 50,000.00 and a Letter of Guarantee on 29th May, 19981. They availed the entire amount of...
Gaj Singh Yadav Vs. Satish Chander Yadav and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-1997
Reported in: 69(1997)DLT414; (1998)118PLR39
J.B. Goel, J.(1) By this order two applications, is No.7801/95 under Section 152 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short the 'Code') and is No. 1327/97 under Order 6 Rule 17 is for amendment of the first application are being disposed of. These applications have been filed by defendants No. 14 & 16. (2) The plaintiff had filed a suit for partition of immovable properties situated at Delhi (Schedule A) and houses and agricultural land situated in village kosli, District Rohtak, (Schedule B) left by his deceased grand-father shiv sahai, the common ancestor. Shiv Sahai had three sons, namely, Surat Singh , Naval Singh and Narain Singh. Plaintiff (who is son from his first wife Smt. Hukam Kaur) and defendants 2 to 9 are the heirs from second Wife of Surat Singh; defendants 10 and 11 are descendants/heirs of Naval Singh; while defendants 13 to 16 are the daughters of Narain Singh. Defendants 1 and 12 have died during the trial. Plaintiff had claimed I/12th share out ...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »